Title: It does not have to be everything:
1It does not have to be everything Trying to
balance communication and access.
Helen Millward Occupational Therapist Chris
Sherlock Speech and Language Therapist Access to
Communication and Technology CM 2008
2Introduction to Access to Communication and
Technology (ACT)
- Helpline 0121 472 0754 Website
www.actwmids.nhs.uk - Email format Firstname.Secondname_at_sbpct.nhs.uk
- Main phone number 0121 627 8235
- Address ACT, WMRC, 91 Oak Tree Lane, Selly Oak,
Birmingham. B29 6JA - Regional NHS Tertiary Assistive Technology
Service all ages and conditions Mission
statement - To work with patients / clients and their local
teams to assess for and provide techniques and
technologies which optimise the potential for
communication and control. - Staff OT, SLT, Clinical Scientists, Workshop
Team, Administrators about 30 people. - Other teams in UK are similar but each is unique
- NB WM AAC Care pathway version 3
3Introduction to ACT
4Learning outcomes
- After attending this presentation participants
will have considered - Some pros and cons of 3 systems of vocabulary
organisation - Narrative based
- Phrase based
- Linguistically organised single words
- The impact of access methods and access effort on
the choices made about vocabulary storage when
using VOCAs - Communication functions choices/priorities for
different AAC users. - Some choices to be made about digitised and
synthesized speech
5Why we are discussing this topic?
- As a team and with local colleagues we have moved
away from off the shelf vocabulary packages
towards bespoke narrative based packages. - The more effortful the access for the client the
more we have moved towards bespoke programming - The communication functions for which these
clients use their AAC has also dictated the
paths we have taken. - Characteristically these clients
- Are sociable people
- Have mild to moderate LD and are not literate or
minimally so - Are out of school/in later school years (post 16)
- Communicate in a number of different environments
and have a number of different strategies. - Have families who skilfully and richly interpret
their non verbal and spoken communication.
6Main theoretical points
- Achieving a Balance between AAC and non
verbal/residual speech in someones
communication emphasis on augmenting existing
communication in clients who are in the
expressive language group for AAC - Vocab storage/ organisation methods what are
they good for? - Language based
- Narrative based (telling ones own self
defining stories) - Phrase based
- Taxonomic V Schematic issues
- Vocabulary for Social closeness
- Access effort
- Synthesized and digitised speech
7Expressive language group
- Expressive language group these are individuals
whose language comprehension may be good, but due
to physical impairment they are not able to
produce verbal speech. Included in this group
might be people with cerebral palsy. These
individuals will need AAC as a permanent means of
expression, to be used in all situations.
Although they may understand spoken language,
they will require AAC input as a model to assist
them to learn how to use their system. - Martinsen, H von Tetzchner, S (1996)
8Achieving a Balance effort and message (1)
- Clients are able to get many of their wants and
needs across using their residual communication
skills with their familiar communication
partners. Even though we would describe them as
being in the expressive language group. - Using these residual communication methods is
less effortful than using a voice output
communication aid. - Using residual communication methods can put more
of the responsibility for the communication onto
the communication partner. - BUT
9Achieving a Balance effort and message (2)
- The communication of narrative
- Which is motivating
- Reusable but needs recalling and choosing
- This is where the effort to retrieve the story
from the AAC system becomes more worthwhile to
the person and the effort for the communication
partner can be reduced. - Having a system that is weighted towards larger
narrative chunks for clients can potentially be
the best focus for their AAC system.
10Vocab storage/ organisation methods
- Mainly Dynamic screen VOCAs
- (also include medium and low tech AAC)
- Making some slightly artificial distinctions. A
lot of cross over now - Can still put aspects of Minspeak based AAC into
the picture.
11Vocab storage/ organisation methods
- Language based pages based on a left to right
sentence building structure single word or short
phrase/selection. Related pages with topic based
words and parts of speech e.g. Little words,
verbs, describing words. Personalisation space
available E.g. Gateway (mainly taxonomic) - Pros very flexible for novel utterances, useful
for those with stronger language skills,
meta-linguistic skills and navigational skills.
Finding high content single words/short phrases. - Cons laborious for building complex/structured
output. Very limited for intonation even with
digitised speech. Can lack space for longer
personalized output or this is buried.
12Vocab storage/ organisation methods
- Narrative based Pages based on longer utterances
that tell or build to tell personal stories and
might/should include phrases to be used to engage
a communication partner. E.g. aspects of
INTERAACT pages by DynaVox. - Concept of re-useable communication (Waller and
Newell 1997) - Pros expresses the personality, interests and
memories of the person easily, shares
communication that is self defining and more
closely to real time. Big output pay off for
selection of a few items. - Cons needs designing and creating with careful
structuring and lots of updating, less novel or
flexible output. Reduced range of interactions
possible.
13Vocab storage/ organisation methods
- Phrase based pages of a schematic style that
relate to communication within and about a topic,
situation or event. Spoken output is
characteristically phrase and sentence based.
Typically adaptations of basic off the shelf
page sets. - Pros some flexibility and novel output possible.
Relatively easy to structure. More output per
selection(s). - Cons Lots of pages needed to cover a wide range
of situations, needs updating and developing.
Reduced flexibility. Less suitable for
synthesized speech?
14Vocab storage/ organisation methods
- Taxonomic organization refers to a hierarchical
system of categories that are related to one
another by means of class inclusion.
Foodgtpizzagtthin crust - Schematic Organization includes items related to
scenes or event scripts that are based on
functional organising principles. Circle time
teacher/time table/sing/show/
15Vocabulary for Social closeness
- Light (1998) identified that a key function of
communication was for social closeness and that
this could be achieved through the sharing of
narrative. - For example
- Narrative about the life of patients in acute/ICU
settings has been shown to help staff caring for
people to see them more holistically - The communication passport/life book process
supports the communication of the AAC user in a
range of ways including memory, sharing stories
and broadening the perceptions of communication
partners about the person.
16Vocabulary for Social closeness
- Aims to Establish and maintain and or develop
personal relationships - By focussing on the interpersonal relationship
- May be lengthy but might be somewhat predictable
or have a wide scope - Rate may not be important
- There will be some tolerance for communication
break down - Usually 2 people or only a small group
- The communicator does not have to be independent.
- Communication partners are often familiar with
each other.
17Access effort
- It is recognised that using a voice out put
communication aid is slower than using a voice. - The speed of vocabulary retrieval can be slowed
even more if an individual has additional
requirements accessing it such as - Use of alternative access method like switches or
joystick requiring the additional learning to
understand the process of selecting the
vocabulary as well as the effort to get to that
vocabulary. - Effort required to maintain general trunk
stability to allow for movement to directly
access a device with a functional level of
accuracy.
18Access effort
- Experience suggests that there is also a greater
impact on cognitive load if there is an
additional access method or if the individual is
having to concentrate on maintaining their
position. - For some individuals this can impact on their
motivation for using a communication aid and this
motivation can be impaired if they have limited
response to the output they retrieve.
19Synthesized and digitised speech
- Speech from VOCAs is retrieved and generated
either by synthesis - or
- digitised speech recording and playback.
- VOCAs with synthesized speech usually also store
some digitised speech but not V.V. - For narrative and longer voice out put each
system has its strengths and weaknesses
20Strengths and weaknesses
- E.g.
- Digitised speech gives a more natural flow and
emphasize emotions such as humour and perhaps
indicate communicative intent better through
intonation. - Synthesized speech make take less long to load
when selected than Digitized speech - In aids where photos are being used the memory
load on a purely digitised speech dynamic screen
device can be significant, and may slow the aid
down.
21Case study 1 Wendy
- Woman, 22 years with Athetoid CP and
mild-moderate learning difficulties. No
intelligible speech. - Sociable and with a very supportive family
- Attending Local independent day centre
- Participates in holidays/club with PHAB
- Respite overnights
- Might move to independent living.
- Access method 2 switch using a slide switch. Very
effortful.
22Case study 1 W
- Using a communication aid first from aged 8
- Majority of school time using a range of formal
off the shelf language based vocab packages
which she could use to build short sentences in
structured settings but usually used in a single
high content word approach to contextualize
message. - Single familiar and motivating word recognition
for reading - First letter generation for spelling familiar
words.
23Case study 1 W
- Communication with family etc able to make wants
and needs known with non verbal communication and
shared knowledge and some no tech AAC approaches
for choices. - W wanted an aid that would allow her to
participate in discussion about college outings
and tell stories about her nephew.
24Case study 1 W
- Development of bespoke communication package
A vocabulary package was developed and has
continued to be updated to maintain the
usefulness of the programming. It consists of 40
location pages with quick phrases on the first
two rows, link pages on the bottom 3 rows.
Synthesized speech.
25Case study 1 W
- Link buttons go to a page which are set up with
more specific vocabulary of a schematic and or
narrative type. - The narrative stories are set up with the
potential for turn taking - and developing expansion of the story.
- Big pay off for single selection in terms of
length of voice output. - There is a link button on the majority of pages
with access to sentence building vocabulary and
the potential to build novel messages. This is
rarely used.
26Case study 1 W
- W is using this style of vocabulary to a greater
extent than previous systems. - She is using it at college and recent effort has
been put in to encourage her to use it when she
goes into respite care. - W is able to get high reward vocabulary from
limited number of key activations. - It has required a high level of support to keep
the vocabulary up to date and current.
27Case study 1 W
- Challenges/pros and cons
- Creating the programme to begin with is time
consuming and involves lots of work on
Vocabulary. - Problems recently when output did not match what
was needed and longer output could not be stopped
by W. - Keeping it up to date.
- Still very effortful to access and this affects
practice - The Computer access linked in with email access
has encouraged Ws use of the vocabulary to put
into emails. - System needs to be supplemented by use of Low
tech for quicker messages e.g. about basic needs.
- Communication partners are crucial.
28Case study 2 Reena
- R is 9. She currently has a MT4 with Gateway 60
on it. - R has cerebral palsy of an athetoid type with
marked dystonic movements of her right arm which
she chooses to have stabilised on the arm of her
chair by tethering. - R demonstrates understanding/comprehension at
above 5 information carrying words. - R directly accesses her MT4.
- she is able to stabilise her index finger of her
left hand. - Respite care overnights at school
- Brownies at school
- Family have many animals and live in the country.
29Case study 2 R
- Communication
- Has Gateway 60 package
- Communicates with her family mainly using non
verbal communication single words, able to
communicate his wants and needs in this way with
rich interpretation and shared knowledge. - R is able to participate in discussion using her
VOCA mainly using single high content words and
rich interpretation from experienced
communication partner. - I.e. expression does not match comprehension
Multi-factorial reasons for this. - Rs local school team have personalised her
programming with pages of schematic and
pragmatically based longer utterance Vocabulary. - R is asking for more of the same particularly
jokes and phrases.
30Case study 2 R
- Challenges/pros and cons
- Maintaining programming including longer
utterances - Motivating her to use more of the language based
package - Supporting her to develop his language skills
with the aid
31Discussion
- Common themes
- Clients who can not programme for themselves
- Still a big effort to produce utterances that
have power and are motivating - Level of non augmented communication that the
person has in some situations - Wanting to have communication for social
closeness humour and sharing stories about their
lives - Level of effort to prepare the bespoke
programming - Local level maintenance and development of
current narrative based vocabulary
32Discussion it is late.BUT!
- It appears that a significant theme of CM 2008 is
around narrative in Augmentative and Alternative
Communication. - Are there any overall messages emerging from
this? - Should most AAC for Expressive language AAC users
with increased access effort/decreased access
efficiency be of a narrative type? - What are the experiences of the group?
- What are the messages we should give to
manufacturers?
33Conclusions
- A system does not have to be everything for
clients - Concentrating on narrative for many clients is
motivating - It is a lot of work for everyone but this is
Augmentative and Alternative Communication. - There have to be alternatives for other
communication e.g. low tech/no tech/speech - Issues of access can influence how much choose to
go down the route of narrative/ chunk type
programming - Thank you and a safe journey home
34References
- Fallon, K.A., Light, J. Achenbach, A. 2003 The
semantic organization patterns of Young Children
Implications for Augmentative and Alternative
Communication. Augmentative and Alternative
Communication June 2003 Vol. 19 (2) - Goossens, C., Crain, S.S. Elder, P. S. 1992
Engineering the preschool environment for
interactive symbolic communication. Southeast
Augmentative Communication Conference
Publications - Light, J. 1998 Interaction involving individuals
using Augmentative and Alternative Communication
systems state of the art and future directions.
Augmentative and Alternative Communication
4,66-82 - Martinsen, H von Tetzchner, S (1996) Situating
augmentative and alternative language
intervention In S von Tetzchner M Hygum Jensen
(eds) (1996) Augmentative and Alternative
Communication European Perspectives. Whurr
Publishers Ltd. London - MacAulay, F, Etchels, M. Judson, A., Ashraf, S.,
Ricketts, I.W., Waller, A., Brodie, J. K., Alm,
N., Warden, A. Shearer, A. J. 2003 ICU-Talk an
AAC device for intubated patients in Intensive
care. Communication matters Vol.17 No.1 - MacDonald, A. Siggs, M. (2007) Beyond the
symbol chart. Chat books and want cards.
Communication Matters Vol 21 No 1 April 2007 - Milkin, C.C. 1997 Symbol systems and Vocabulary
selection strategies. in The Handbook of
Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
Glennen, S. DeCoste, D. C. 1997 - Szeto, A.Y.J., Allen, E.J. Littrell, M.C.
1993. Comparison of speed and accuracy for
selected electronic communication devices and
input methods. Augmentative and Alternative
Communication, Volume 9, Issue 4 December 1993. - Waller. A, (2006). Communication Access to
Conversational Narrative. Topics in Language
Disorders. Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 221239. - Waller, A, Newell, A.F. 1997 Towards a
narrative-based augmentative communication
system. EJDC Vol.32 No.3 Special Issue