Title: Transaction Management and Concurre cy Overview
1Transaction Management and Concurrecy Overview
There are three side effects of acid. Enhanced
long term memory, decreased short term memory,
and I forget the third. - Timothy Leary
2Administrivia
- Homework 3 due today by end of class period
- Homework 4 available on class website
- Due date April 10 (after Spring Break)
- Midterm 2 is next class! Thu 3/22
- In class, covers lectures 10-17
- Review will be held Wed 3/21 7-9 pm 306 Soda Hall
3Components of a DBMS
We are here
DBMS a set of cooperating software modules
4Correctness criteria The ACID properties
- A tomicity All actions in the Xact happen, or
none happen. - C onsistency If each Xact is consistent, and
the DB starts consistent, it ends up consistent. - I solation Execution of one Xact is isolated
from that of other Xacts. - D urability If a Xact commits, its effects
persist.
We are here
5Review - Definitions
- Transaction - a sequence of read and write
operations (read(A), write(B), ) - DBMSs abstract view of a user program
- Serial schedule Schedule that does not
interleave the actions of different transactions. - Equivalent schedules For any database state,
the effect of executing the first schedule is
identical to the effect of executing the second
schedule. - Serializable schedule A schedule that is
equivalent to some serial execution of the
transactions. - (Note If each transaction preserves
consistency, every serializable schedule
preserves consistency. )
6Anomalies with interleaved execution
- Reading Uncommitted Data (WR, dirty reads)
- T2 reads a value A that T1 wrote but didnt
commit - e.g T1 moves 100 from account B to account A
- T2 adds 6 interest to account A
- 1100 66 900 2066 total after T1 T2
-gtA1166
B1000-100 900
A? B1000
AA1001100
B1000
A1000
T1 R(A), W(A), R(B), W(B),
Abort T2 R(A), W(A), C
A1100
A11001.06 1166
A1166 B1000
11661000 2166 -gt Bank is out 106 because T2
read T1s A value before it was done!
7Anomalies with interleaved execution
- Unrepeatable Reads (RW Conflicts)
- T1 reads a value A that is then written by T2
- e.g. T1 and T2 place orders for books, and A
represents the quantity in stock (1)
Hopefully T1 gets an error if there is an
integrity constraint!
A1
A0
A-1
T1 R(A), R(A), W(A) T2 R(A), W(A),
C
A1
A0
A0
8Anomalies with interleaved execution
- Overwriting Uncommitted Data (WW, lost update)
- T2 overwrites a write by T1
- e.g. T1 assigns seat A to passenger 1 and
- seat B to passenger 2
- T2 assigns seat A to passenger 3 and
- seat B to passenger 4
A3 B2
-gt Passenger 1s partner is sitting with
passenger 3!
B2
A1
T1 W(A), W(B), C T2 W(A), W(B), C
A3 B4
A3
B4
9How to prevent anomalies? Locks!
- Database allows objects to be locked
- object might be entire database, file, page,
tuple - Two kinds of locks
- Shared or Read Lock
- No one else is allowed to write the object if you
have this - Exclusive or Write Lock
- No one else is allowed to read or write the object
10Locks are not enough
- If lock/unlock objects right away, anomalies are
still possible - e.g. The unrepeatable read example
T1 obtain ShareLock(A)
T1 obtain ShareLock(A)
T1 release ShareLock(A)
T1 R(A), R(A), W(A) T2 R(A), W(A),
C
T2 obtain ExclusiveLockL(A)
T2 release ExclusiveLock(A)
11Locks are not enough
- Idea Two Phase Locking
- In a transaction,
- only acquire locks in one phase
- only release locks in a second phase
- once one lock has been released, can never
acquire another lock during transaction
locks
Time
T1 obtain ExclusiveLock(A)
T1 release lock(A)
T1 R(A), R(A), W(A), . T2
R(A),W(A), C
T2 waits to obtain ExclusiveLock(A)
T2 obtains ExclusiveLock(A)
12Lock-Based Concurrency Control
- Two-phase Locking (2PL) Protocol
- Each Xact must obtain
- a S (shared) lock on object before reading, and
- an X (exclusive) lock on object before writing.
- If an Xact holds an X lock on an object, no other
Xact can get a lock (S or X) on that object. - System can obtain these locks automatically
- Two phases acquiring locks, and releasing them
- No lock is ever acquired after one has been
released - Growing phase followed by shrinking phase.
- Lock Manager keeps track of request for locks and
grants locks on database objects when they become
available.
13 Strict 2PL
- 2PL allows only serializable schedules but is
subjected to cascading aborts. - Example rollback of T1 requires rollback of T2!
T1 obtain ExclusiveLock(A)
T1 release ExclusiveLock(A)
Abort
T1 R(A), W(A),
T2 R(A), W(A), R(B), W(B)
T2 obtains ExclusiveLock(A)
T2 read T1s value of A, so it must also be
aborted.
- To avoid Cascading aborts, use Strict 2PL
14Strict 2PL (cont)
- Strict Two-phase Locking (Strict 2PL) Protocol
- Same as 2PL, except
- All locks held by a transaction are released only
when the transaction completes
locks
vs
- Advantage no other transaction even reads
anything you write until you commit. - e.g a transaction will only read committed data.
- Disadvantage transactions end up waiting.
- e.g. inserts may lock a whole table
- Why? Because of Phantom problem
15The Phantom Problem
- Even Strict 2PL (on individual rows) will not
assure serializability - Consider T1 Find oldest sailor with Rating
1 - T1 sees 2 different answers, even though it did
no updates itself.
16Transactions in SQL
- A new transaction is started with first SQL
statement issued by a user - SELECT S.SID, R.BID
- FROM SAILORS S, RESERVES R
- WHERE S.SID R.SID
- All statements from that point on appear in the
same transaction - UPDATE SAILORS SET RATING RATING - 1
- UPDATE RESERVES SET DATE DATE1
- A user can use commands COMMIT or ROLLBACK to
explicitly end a transaction and start a new one - COMMIT
- Any new statements that follow will occur in a
new transaction
17Transactions in SQL
- Because of performance, some anomalies might be
acceptable for some applications - Internet apps in particular!
- SQL 92 supports different Isolation Levels for
a transaction (Lost Update not allowed at any
level)
18Aborting a Transaction (i.e., Rollback)
- If an xact Ti aborted, all actions must be
undone. - To undo actions of an aborted transaction, DBMS
maintains log which records every write. - Log is also used to recover from system crashes
- (which can occur as either hardware or software
failure) - All active Xacts at time of crash are aborted
when system comes back up.
19The Database Log
XID 1 REDO TID 1 ltdatagt REDO TID 2
ltdatagt COMMIT XID 2 REDO TID 3 ltdatagt
Buffer
Data Page
Data Page
Log
- Updates are logged in the database log.
- Log consists of records that are written
sequentially. - Typically chained together by Xact id
- Log is often archived on stable storage.
- And backed up to even more stable storage (like
tape!)
Data Pages
Log
20The Database Log
- Write-Ahead Logging protocol
- Log record must go to disk before the changed
page! - All log records for a transaction (including its
commit record) must be written to disk before the
transaction is considered Committed.
3
1
SQL COMMIT XID1
2
21The Log
- Log records are either UNDO or REDO records
- Depends on the Buffer manager
- UNDO required if Buffer mgr allows uncommitted
data to overwrite stable version of committed
data (STEAL buffer management). - REDO required if xact can commit before all its
updates are on disk (NO FORCE buffer management). - The following actions are recorded in the log
- if Ti writes an object, write a log record with
- If UNDO required need before image
- IF REDO required need after image.
- Ti commits/aborts a log record indicating this
action.
22How Professor Roth made some traders very unhappy
at market open
XID 1 REDO TID 1 ltdatagt REDO TID 2
ltdatagt COMMIT XID 2 REDO TID 3 ltdatagt
- Log on disk can fill up quickly for active DBMS
- DBMS duplexes between two logs
- Writes DB log to one
- While archiving the other
- When DB log is full, reverse
- Must STOP all DBMS activity while you reverse
Log
Log2
Log1
Log
23How Professor Roth made some traders very unhappy
at market open
- Stock DB at market open is VERY busy
- We wanted to make sure there was an empty log
just before market open - I wrote a script to switch logs 5 mins before
market open - If (not already writing a log)
- Then switch logs
- Write the old log to tape
- Except I forgot a comma, so it was more like
this - Switch logs write the old log to tape
- ...and because the DB was writing out its log,
the DB hung until it was done writing to tape!
XID 1 REDO TID 1 ltdatagt REDO TID 2
ltdatagt COMMIT XID 2 REDO TID 3 ltdatagt
Log
Im waiting
Log2
Log1
24(Review) Goal The ACID properties
- A tomicity All actions in the Xact happen, or
none happen. - C onsistency If each Xact is consistent, and
the DB starts consistent, it ends up consistent. - I solation Execution of one Xact is isolated
from that of other Xacts. - D urability If a Xact commits, its effects
persist.
What happens if system crashes between commit and
flushing modified data to disk ?
25Durability - Recovering From a Crash
D
- Three phases
- Analysis Scan the log (forward from the most
recent checkpoint) to identify all Xacts that
were active at the time of the crash. - Redo Redo updates as needed to ensure that all
logged updates are in fact carried out and
written to disk. - Undo Undo writes of all Xacts that were active
at the crash, working backwards in the log. - At the end all committed updates and only those
updates are reflected in the database. - Some care must be taken to handle the case of a
crash occurring during the recovery process!
26Summary
- Concurrency control and recovery are among the
most important functions provided by a DBMS. - Concurrency control is automatic
- System automatically inserts lock/unlock requests
and schedules actions of different Xacts - Property ensured resulting execution is
equivalent to executing the Xacts one after the
other in some order. - Write-ahead logging (WAL) and the recovery
protocol are used to - 1. undo the actions of aborted transactions, and
- 2. restore the system to a consistent state after
a crash.