CORROSION Section 2: Basic Corrosion Measurements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

CORROSION Section 2: Basic Corrosion Measurements

Description:

Weigh before, weigh after (if piece small enough for reasonable balance ... some might fall off (spall) ... some might have been deposited from the environment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:852
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: willi320
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CORROSION Section 2: Basic Corrosion Measurements


1
CORROSIONSection 2 Basic Corrosion Measurements
  • By
  • D.H. Lister W.G. Cook
  • Department of Chemical Engineering
  • University of New Brunswick

2
  • If a piece of metal
  • corrodes to this
  • How would we know how much corrosion had
    occurred?
  • Clearly, we need before and after measurements
    but of what?

3
  • Size?
  • Length, breadth and thickness before
  • What about after?
  • Volume before, volume after .. by liquid
    displacement .
  • Sensitive enough?
  • Mass?
  • Weigh before, weigh after (if piece small enough
    for reasonable balance note that measuring
    weight losses to a fraction of a mg in a few
    grams is the norm in corrosion testing).
  • To be of any use, a weight loss measurement has
    to be scaled to the size of the specimen
    corrosion is a surface related phenomenon.

4
  • Because corrosion is a surface phenomenon, weight
    loss is related to surface area (SA)
  • For example
  • a metal coupon having a total surface area of
    10 cm2 loses 1 mg when exposed to a particular
    environment for a month
  • which should be a characteristic amount for that
    metal in that environment in a month.

5
  • Corrosion engineers traditionally work in units
    of dm2, thus
  • BUT even though mdms give reasonable numbers
    for most corrosion situations, the month is a bad
    unit Why?
  • So are often used . mdd

6
  • If we know the metal density, we can convert the
    weight loss to penetration
  • for ? in g/cm3
  • Which isnt a very practical unit.

7
  • However, we note that 1 cm 104 mm, thus
  • Another common unit for corrosion penetraion (in
    the US) is the mil or milli-inch per year
    (0.001 in/year).

8
  • NOTE these rates are averaged over the exposure
    time, and are quoted as if corrosion were
    constant with time it often is not
  • measure rate 1 measure rate 2

9
  • Often, our bit of metal ..
  • after exposure, looks like this
  • It is covered with scale.
  • How would we assess corrosion under these
    conditions?

10
  • Scaled (e.g., oxidized) specimens often
    experience a weight gain thus, the
    high-temperature oxidation of iron proceeds
  • 4Fe 3O2 ? 2Fe2O3
  • (4?56)g (4?56 6?16)g
  • If we know scale composition (e.g., type of
    oxide) and weight gain, we can calculate the Fe
    in the oxide and, therefore, the Fe corroded.

11
  • BUT we can rarely be sure that the scale
    accounts exactly for the corrosion some might
    fall off (spall) some might have been deposited
    from the environment
  • NOW WHAT?

12
  • Consider the scaling process
  • Weight before Wo g
  • Surface area A dm2
  • Exposure time ? days
  • Find condition weight after W1 g

13
  • We can only be sure that the remaining metal
    provides an unequivocal reference, so
  • Descale
  • Descaled weight W2 g

14
  • (divided by ? for rate mdd)
  • We also have a measure of the weight of scale
  • If we assume the scale is composed of Fe2O3, we
    can calculate the iron in scale as

15
  • The difference between iron in scale and total
    amount corroded is either
  • Iron released to environment OR
  • Iron deposited from environment

16
  • How do we descale?
  • Chemically or electrochemically usually in weak
    acids.
  • BUT such descaling can also dissolve some of
    the remaining metal, so how do we account for
    this?
  • employ an inhibitor
  • use a blank

17
  • A blank is a bare specimen put into the
    descaling solution along with the specimen
  • during the descaling, if the blank corrodes by
  • we apply this blank correction to the specimen
    measurement
  • DRAWBACKS? DISCUSS
  • EXAMPLE.

18
  • Note such corrosion measurements and units are
    useful for general or uniform corrosion but they
    dont work for localized corrosion (e.g. pitting
    or cracking). A component can fail by stress
    corrosion cracking (SCC) with no detectable
    weight loss

19
  • For these situations, we use concepts such as
    crack propagation rate or pit propagation rate.
  • For example
  • percent through-wall for tubes, pipes,
    vessels, etc.
  • crack depth or pit depth usually in mil or
    mm
  • propagation rate
    etc.

20
Examples of Corrosion
  • General corrosion .
  • General corrosion of the reactor vessel head of
    the Davis-Besse PWR. (note this exterior general
    corrosion was indicative of a much more serious
    local corrosion problem due to a leak in the
    pressure boundary)

21
  • Classic crevice corrosion. In this case caused by
    a carbon rubber exhaust flapper clamped onto a
    stainless exhaust flange plate. Notice that the
    worst corrosion is where the clamp pressed the
    rubber the tightest.

22
  • Stress Corrosion
  • Stress corrosion of stainless steel type 304
    autoclave. (Mallinckrodt Chemical Works)

23
  • How would you measure (estimate) the corrosion
    of plant components?
  • For example
  • pressure vessels or pressure tubes
  • feeder pipes
  • steam generator tubes
  • feedwater pipes and heaters
  • etc.
  • DISCUSS

24
  • Methods involve
  • Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) or
  • Non-Destructive Testing (NDT)
  • and include
  • Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
  • Eddy Current
  • Acoustic Emission
  • etc.

25
  • Some useful conversion factors
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com