Spreading codes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Spreading codes

Description:

Spectral Peak to Average ratio (SPAR) ... Impulse has 0dB SPAR. TPAR of Impulse is worst. Need to balance sequence length and PRF to get a good SPAR and a good ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:249
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: MichaelMc7
Learn more at: https://grouper.ieee.org
Category:
Tags: codes | spar | spreading

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Spreading codes


1
Project IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless
Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title
Codes for preamble and data Date Submitted
7 June, 2005 Source Michael Mc Laughlin
Company Decawave Ltd. Address 25 Meadowfield,
Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland Voice353-1-29549
37 , FAX Whats a FAX?, E-Mail
michael_at_decawave.com Re 802.15.4a. Abstra
ct Discusses the desirable properties of
spreading sequences Purpose To promote
discussion in 802.15.4a. Notice This document
has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It
is offered as a basis for discussion and is not
binding on the contributing individual(s) or
organization(s). The material in this document is
subject to change in form and content after
further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the
right to add, amend or withdraw material
contained herein. Release The contributor
acknowledges and accepts that this contribution
becomes the property of IEEE and may be made
publicly available by P802.15.
2
Spreading sequencesDesirable properties
3
Five KEY properties
  • Sequence Length
  • Pulse Repetition Frequency
  • Autocorrelation properties
  • Periodic autocorrelation (Channel sounding)
  • Aperiodic autocorrelation (Data mode)
  • Spectral peak to average ratio (SPAR)
  • FCC requirements
  • Temporal peak to average ratio (TPAR)
  • Power supply requirements

4
Periodic Autocorrelation (1)
  • For channel sounding, a repeated sequence is
    appropriate.
  • Periodic autocorrelation function is the
    important property for a channel sounding
    sequence
  • Ipatov ternary sequences have perfect periodic
    autocorrelation i.e. all side lobes are zero
  • PBTS codes (from WBA/I2R) also have perfect
    periodic autocorrelation
  • m-sequences have ideal periodic
    autocorrelation, i.e. their autocorrelation
    function is N (the sequence length) at one sample
    period and -1 everywhere else.

5
Periodic Autocorrelation (2)
  • This means that the output of a correlator
    operating on repeated Ipatov Transmitted
    sequences is EXACTLY, the channel impulse
    repeated, plus noise.
  • The output of a correlator operating on a
    repeated m-sequence is CLOSE TO the channel
    impulse response noise.

6
Example Correlator Outputs
7
Aperiodic Autocorrelation
  • For transmitting data, aperiodic autocorrelation
    function (AACF) is appropriate.
  • Previous and next sequences may not be the same.
  • Good AACF means low ISI
  • Golay Merit Factor (GMF) is a common measure of
    goodness of AACF. (Golay 1977)

8
Golay Merit Factor
  • GMF is defined as
  • where ac is the aperiodic auto correlation
    function of a length n sequence
  • The average GMF of binary sequences is 1.0
  • Best known GMF for binary sequences is 14.08 for
    the Barker 13 sequence, next is 12.1 for the
    Barker 11 sequence.
  • The mean Golay merit factor of the length 32
    Walsh-Hadamard matrix is 0.194.
  • GMF greater than 6 is rare

9
Autocorrelation High GMF
10
Autocorrelation Low GMF
11
Matched Filter Output High GMF
12
Matched Filter Output Low GMF
13
Spectral Peak to Average ratio (SPAR)
  • In absence of ITU recommendations, use the FCC
    requirements.
  • Spectrum measured in 1MHz frequency bins for 1ms
    intervals.
  • Need Low SPAR.
  • SPAR in dBs converts to power backoff required.

14
Temporal Peak to Average Ratio
  • Need low TPAR, otherwise need high voltage power
    supply.
  • Best GMF (Infinite) is a single impulse.
  • Impulse has 0dB SPAR
  • TPAR of Impulse is worst
  • Need to balance sequence length and PRF to get a
    good SPAR and a good TPAR.

15
Example sequences
  • One of the Ipatov length 57 sequences
  • -00--0--------0-0-----0--0
    0--
  • GMF is 3.75
  • A Length 63 m sequence
  • -----------------------------
    ---
  • GMF is 3.52
  • Both of these sequences, if transmitted
    repeatedly back to back, have a flat spectrum
  • Ipatov sequences are available at the following
    lengths 7,13,21,31,57,73,91,127,133,183,273,307,3
    81,512,553,651,757,871,993,1057,1407,1723

16
Sequence length and PRF
  • If sequence is repeated, spectral lines spaced at
    the 1/sequence length apart.
  • Want these to be lt 2MHz apart for FCC
    compliance and low SPAR
  • Needs to be longer than Channel Impulse Response
  • e.g. CM8 has significant energy to 850ns.
  • For a 1000ns duration sequence, a length 553
    sequence requires 10 times lower TPAR than
    length 57, but 10 times larger PRF.

17
TG4a CM8 Magnitudes
18
TG4a CM6 Magnitudes
19
Basic Difference sets for length 31 codes
  • Few zeros
  • Parameters L31,k6, ?1
  • Difference set 1 5 11 24 25 27
  • Balanced zeros
  • Parameters L31,k15, ?7
  • Difference set 1 2 3 4 6 8 12 15
    16 17 23 24 27 29 30

20
Auto correlation. Fewest zeros ipatov sequence
21
Auto correlation. Balanced zero ipatov sequence
22
Autocorrelation of magnitude. Balanced zero codes
23
Autocorrelation of magnitude. Fewest zero codes
24
Cross correlation of fewest zeros ipatov with
modified magnitude sequence
Cross correlation of 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 1 1 0 1 with -4 1 1 -4 1 1 1 1 1
1 -4 -4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -4
1 1 1 -4 1 i.e. 0 replaced by -4
25
Cross correlation of balanced zeros ipatov with
modified magnitude sequence
Cross correlation of 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
1 1 1 0 0 with -1 -1 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 -1
1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 -1
1 1 1 -1 -1 i.e. 0 replaced by -1
26
12 Length 31 codesBalanced Ipatov Sequences
(BITS)
6 Combination of 6 codes with best cross
correlation 3 Combination of 3 codes with best
cross correlation
27
Best 20 of Length 31 Fewest zero codes
28
SPAR, L31 balanced codes
Lower is better
29
Autocorrelation Golay Merit FactorL31 balanced
codes
Higher is better
30
Cross Correlation
Coherent cross-correlation matrix 16 6
4 4 6 4 6 16 6 6 6 4 4 6
16 6 4 4 4 6 6 16 6 6 6
6 4 6 16 6 4 4 4 6 6
16 Non-coherent cross-correlation matrix
16 4 4 4 6 4 4 16 6 4 4
4 4 6 16 4 4 4 4 4 4 16 4
6 6 4 4 4 16 4 4 4 4 6
4 16
31
Preamble PSD for BITSat 30.875MHz PRF
32
Preamble Spectrum Analyzer OutputBITS 30.875MHz
PRF
33
SPAR vs Data mode PSDBITS- Codeword No. 10
Codeword No. 10 SPAR 3.26dB
34
SPAR vs Data mode SpectrumBITS- Codeword No. 10
Codeword No. 10 SPAR 3.26dB
35
Aperiodic PSD 30.85MHz PRF
Codeword No. 10 SPAR 3.26dB
36
Aperiodic PSD 15.4MHz PRF
Codeword No. 10 SPAR 3.26dB
37
Using one of these codes for data
bi-1 0, bi 0
bi-1 0, bi 1
bi-1 1, bi 0
bi-1 1, bi 1
38
Conclusion
  • 2 Recommendations
  • Use periodic BITS codes at 30.875 MHz PRF for
    Preamble
  • Use BPSK BITS codes at variable PRF for Data
    Transmission

39
References
  • Ipatov V. P. Ipatov, Ternary sequences with
    ideal autocorrelation properties Radio Eng.
    Electron. Phys., vol. 24, pp. 75-79, Oct. 1979.
  • Høholdt et al Tom Høholdt and Jørn Justesen,
    Ternary sequences with Perfect Periodic
    Autocorrelation, IEEE Transactions on
    information theory.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com