Folie 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Folie 1

Description:

For UCN guides: Specular Reflectivity ... UCN guides: Highly specular reflection required. Idea: Reflectometry with many reflections ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: PSIU7
Category:
Tags: folie | specular

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Folie 1


1
The UCN double plate experiment
S. Heule Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen
and Physik-Institut der Universität Zürich
2
Ultracold neutrons
  • Ultracold neutrons (UCN) are free neutrons which
    are reflected on certain materials under any
    angle of incidence
  • Purpose measurement of fundamental properties of
    the neutron

Properties Have kinetic energies in the 100 neV
range Move with velocities of few m/s
3
Interactions
  • The four fundamental interactions
  • Gravitational interaction VG mngh
  • 100 neV m-1
  • Magnetic interaction VM -µ B
  • 60 neV T-1
  • Weak interaction
  • beta decay of the neutron
  • Strong interaction with nuclei
  • Fermi potential up to 300 neV
  • Description potential step
  • ?reflection on surfaces / walls ? UCN storage

4
Fermi potential
  • Reflection on walls

vnvC
vn
vn
VFermimvC2/2
5
UCN wall materials
UCN source
diffuse reflection
UCN experiment
specular reflection
5-6 m
  • High Fermi potential
  • Low loss probability per wall collision
  • For UCN guides Specular Reflectivity
  • Diffuse reflection leads to storage effect /
    decreased transmission

6
Wall materials
  • Good wall materials have a Fermi potential above
    250 neV, e.g.
  • Beryllium
  • Nickel (natural, 58Ni)
  • Non-hydrogenated diamond-like carbon (DLC)

7
Testing surfaces
  • UCN guides Highly specular reflection required
  • Idea Reflectometry with many reflections
  • Test under real conditions use UCN
  • The solution
  • The double plate experiment

8
The parallel plates experiment
  • of reflections determined by gap of the plates

S2
S3
S1
S4
D2
D1
9
Setup at ILL
10
Sample plates
  • Length 500 mm
  • RMS-roughness determined by atomic force
    microscopy (AFM, 1µm x 1µm)
  • Floatglass
  • Untreated (RRMS0.9 nm)
  • HF etched (RRMS1.2 nm)
  • Sand-blasted
  • Nickel
  • Coating on Floatglass
  • PSI (RRMS1.6 nm)
  • S-DH Heidelberg (RRMS0.25 nm)
  • Diamond-like carbon
  • From Fraunhofer IWS Dresden (by Ion beam sputter
    deposition, RRMS0.6 nm)
  • Stainless steel (RRMS1.6 nm)

11
first analysis steps
  • Subtraction of separately measured background for
    both detectors
  • Normalized rates D2/D1
  • Compensate for fluctuations in the neutron flux
  • n(d) calculated from the plate distance
  • Angular acceptance determined by apertures S1 and
    S2

12
Simple model
  • Loss factor per wall collision
  • Non-specularly reflected UCN are lost
  • I(d)I(n)I0 Rn
  • Incident rate I0 should be the same for all
    samples

I00.87
I00.24
13
Micro roughness
  • Textbook model developed by Steyerl and
    Ignatovich
  • Small surface irregularities lead to constructive
    interference of scattering from different depths
    of the surface layer
  • Leads to conditions which are satisfied for the
    double plate experiment if RRMS 5 nm
  • Two characteristic numbers RMS-roughness and
    correlation length

14
Probability diffuse scattering
  • RRMS1 nm, Lcorr25 nm, ?I50, En200 neV,
    VFermi252 neV

z
?
y
F
x
According to A. Steyerl, Z. Physik 254 (1972)
169-188
15
Integral probability
  • RRMS1 nm, Lcorr25 nm, VFermi252 neV

vnvC
According to A. Steyerl, Z. Physik 254 (1972)
169-188
16
Test 1 converging plates
  • Smallest angle (36) is transformed to 90 at
    0.24 converging angle of upper plate(gap 5 mm)
  • For all samples
  • Rates above0.24 aresignificantlyabovebackgrou
    nd

17
Test 2 Variation of S4
  • Double slit aperture S4 is replaced by a bar or
    removed completely

NiHD Ni 5/10
18
Converging angle
  • Systematic variation of the RMS roughness shows
    agreement with measurement at R1 nm

Sample Ni HD
19
S4 variation
  • Systematic variation of the RMS roughness shows
    agreement with measurement at R1.4 nm

Sample Ni HD
20
Conclusions
  • UCN double plates experiment performed at ILL
    Grenoble
  • Preliminary analysis shows significant fractions
    of diffuse reflection for various samples
  • Diffuse reflection can be explained qualitatively
    by the Micro roughness model

21
Acknowledgement
  • The work was performed at the Paul Scherrer Instit
    ut, Villigen, Switzerland and at the Institut
    Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France
  • Thanks to all who contributed to the double plate
    experiment
  • This work is supported by the Swiss National
    Science Foundation (SNF, grant 200021-105400)
  • Information about UCN_at_PSI onlinehttp//ucn.web.p
    si.ch

22
The PSI UCN source
rexpgt 1000 cm-3
Diamond-LikeCarbon coatedUCN guides
  • Requirements
  • High Fermi potential
  • Low losses on wall collisions
  • Specular reflection

rUCN6000cm-3
2 mA,600 MeVproton beam1 duty cycle
3 m3 D2O
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com