Transport of Bacterial Endospores in Silica Sand - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Transport of Bacterial Endospores in Silica Sand

Description:

Methods sporulation / saturated column tests / breakthrough curves / depth distribution data ... Methods sporulation / saturated column tests / breakthrough ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:306
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: erica78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transport of Bacterial Endospores in Silica Sand


1
Transport of Bacterial Endospores in Silica Sand
  • Sibylle Tesar, Fulbright Scholar
  • Dr. Barbara Williams, Faculty
  • Dr. Robin Nimmer, Res. Supp. Sci.
  • Angelina Cernick, Undergraduate
  • Kristina Beaulieau, NSF REU

Department of Biological and Agricultural
Engineering University of Idaho
2
Outline
  • Research Goals transport mechanisms /
    endospores
  • Background transport mechanisms / endospores
  • Research Questions preliminary
  • Methods sporulation / saturated column tests /
    breakthrough curves / depth distribution data
  • Preliminary Results
  • Preliminary Conclusions
  • Future Work B. cereus, other microbes

3
Research Goals Spore Transport in Porous Media
  • Mechanistic Goal Contribute to the lively
    debate of attachment versus straining
  • Microbe-specific goal Bacterial endospore
  • Practical Applications
  • Drinking water protection - groundwater
  • Shallow recharge
  • Septic drainfield setbacks
  • Surface water filtration
  • Riverbank or riverbed filtration

4
Outline
  • Research Goals transport mechanisms /
    endospores
  • Background transport mechanisms / endospores
  • Research Questions preliminary
  • Methods sporulation / saturated column tests /
    breakthrough curves / depth distribution data
  • Preliminary Results
  • Preliminary Conclusions
  • Future Work B. cereus, other microbes

5
Terminology Mechanisms for Retention
  • Attachment adhesion sorption
  • Function of collision, collector efficiency,
    sticking efficiency
  • Mechanical filtration complete retention of
    particles that are larger than all of the soil
    pores (formation of filter cake)
  • Straining physical trapping in geometric
    corners
  • Particles can be smaller than smallest pore
    openings
  • Requires grain-grain contact
  • Only occurs in some fraction of soil pore space,
    transport occurs elsewhere

Bradford et al, WRR, 2006
6
Strained versus Mechanically Filtered
dp/d50 ? .005
7
Background
  • Clean-bed Filtration Theory
  • Depends on mechanism of attachment / detachment
  • Deviation from Clean Bed Filtration Theory
  • Unfavorable attachment condition neg-neg
  • Fine sand and large colloids (dp/d50 ? .005)

8
Explanations for Deviation from CFT
  • Attachment w/ porous media charge variability
    Johnson and Elimelech, 1995
  • Attachment w/ heterogeneity in surface charge
    characteristics of colloids Li et al, 2004
  • Attachment w/ deposition of colloids in a
    secondary energy minimum Tufenkji et al. 2003,
    Redman et al., 2004
  • All of the above Tufenkji and Elimelech, 2005
  • Attachment w/ straining Foppen et al, 2005,
    Bradford et al, 2006a, b

9
Theory (cont.)
Aqueous Phase Colloid Mass Balance Equation-
Bradford et al., 2003
  • Where
  • ?w volumetric water content -
  • t time T
  • C colloid concentration in the aqueous phase
    N L-3
  • JT total colloid flux N L-2 T-1
  • EattSW colloid attachment mass transfer
    between solid/water phases N L-3 T-1
  • EstrSW colloid straining mass transfer between
    solid/water phases N L-3 T-1

10
Research Goals Endospore Transport
  • Endospore-forming bacteria have two viable modes
  • Vegetative cell (growing)
  • Endospore (dormant) formed as survival
    mechanism
  • Endospores have the potential to be more mobile
    than their vegetative cell counterparts
  • smaller size
  • potentially less adhesion

11
Bacterial Endospores
  • Formed as a survival mechanism
  • Cryptobiotic no sign of life - dormant mode

http//www.textbookofbacteriology.net/
12
Differences between endospores and vegetative
cells in Bacillus species
http//www.textbookofbacteriology.net
13
Differences between endospores and vegetative
cells in Bacillus species
14
In terms of physical passage through the pore
space
the spore has a shorter aspect ratio than the
vegetative cell.
  • B. cereus spore properties
  • Food poisoning pathogen
  • Length 1-2 mm, Width 0.5-0.75 mm
  • Hydrophobic
  • Isoelectric point pH 3

15
Outline
  • Research Goals transport mechanisms /
    endospores
  • Background transport mechanisms / endospores
  • Research Questions preliminary
  • Methods sporulation / saturated column tests /
    breakthrough curves / depth distribution data
  • Preliminary Results
  • Preliminary Conclusions
  • Future Work B. cereus, other microbes

16
Preliminary Research Questions
  • Do spores obey CFT, exhibiting more retention in
    higher ionic strength solution or does spore
    transport deviate from CFT theory as do other
    negatively charged particles (unfavorable
    attachment)?
  • Future Do vegetative cells and endospores have
    a different charge?
  • Future Do vegetative cells exhibit more
    attachment than endospores?

17
Outline
  • Research Goals transport mechanisms /
    endospores
  • Background transport mechanisms / endospores
  • Research Questions preliminary
  • Methods sporulation / saturated column tests /
    breakthrough curves / depth distribution data
  • Preliminary Results
  • Preliminary Conclusions
  • Future Work B. cereus, other microbes

18
Materials Sand Properties
  • Saturated conductivity Ksat 1.8x10-4 m/sec
  • Dry bulk density
  • rb 1.65 g/cm3
  • Porosity
  • n 0.34
  • dp/d50 ? .0017

19
Method Constant Head, Sand Column
20
Breakthrough (C/Co) of B. cereus spores as a
function of ionic strength
Artificial groundwater
DDI
21
Column Dissection
22
Column Dissection
  • Drain column to field capacity, in the flow
    direction.
  • Dissect into seven 2 cm increments
  • STR 1 Gently place sand, allowing bridging and
    loose packing, in a funnel that has been plugged
    with Scotchbritetm pad
  • STR 2 Wash off the strained bacteria by pouring
    the solution (the solution used in that
    particular experiment) over the sand into a
    graduated cylinder
  • ATT To remove the attached bacteria, place a
    known amount of 2 Tweentm 80 solution into a
    beaker containing the sand. Stir then sonicate.
  • Used optical density (OD) measurements in
    addition to plate counting to enumerate.

(Tween and sonication proven not to affect
germination efficiency)
23
Depth Distribution Data
Strained spores in AGW run
24
Depth Distribution Data
Attached spores in AGW run
25
Depth Distribution Data
Strained and attached fractions combined
26
Outline
  • Research Goals transport mechanisms /
    endospores
  • Background transport mechanisms / endospores
  • Research Questions preliminary
  • Methods sporulation / saturated column tests /
    breakthrough curves / depth distribution data
  • Preliminary Results
  • Preliminary Conclusions
  • Future Work B. cereus, other microbes

27
Preliminary Conclusions
  • Breakthrough curve data are consistent with CFT
    higher ionic strength, more retention
  • Depth distribution data show deviation from CFT
    not exponential with depth

28
Outline
  • Research Goals transport mechanisms /
    endospores
  • Background transport mechanisms / endospores
  • Research Questions preliminary
  • Methods sporulation / saturated column tests /
    breakthrough curves / depth distribution data
  • Preliminary Results
  • Preliminary Conclusions
  • Future Work B. cereus, other microbes

29
Future Work
  • Compare attachment/straining of spores versus
    vegetative cells
  • Column experiments
  • Micromodels and photographs
  • Wet AFM
  • Compare zeta potential
  • pH and more ionic strength effects
  • Different endospore bacteria, such as S.
    pasteurii, for biomineralization

30
Acknowledgements
  • Dr. Ron Crawford, Director, Environmental
    Biotechnology Institute, UI
  • Nick Benardini, PhD Candidate, MMBB
  • Elizabeth Scherling, MS, BAE
  • Dr. Markus Tuller, PSES
  • David Christian, Research Support Sci.

31
Funding Acknowledgements
  • Fulbright Scholars Program
  • USDA Hatch
  • UI URO Seed Grant Program
  • NSF REU program

32
References
  • Bradford, S.A., J. imunek, M. Bettahar, M.
    vanGenuchten, and S.R. Yates. 2003. Modeling
    colloid attachment, straining, and exclusion in
    saturated porous media. Environmental Science
    and Technology 37 2242-2250.
  • Bradford, S.A., J. imunek, M. Bettahar, M.Th.
    vanGenuchten, and S.R. Yates. 2006a.
    Significance of straining in colloid deposition
    evidence and implications. Water Resources
    Research, 42doi10.1029/2005WR004791.
  • Bradford, S.A., J. imunek, and S.L. Walker.
    2006b. Transport and straining of E. coli
    0157H7 in saturated porous media. Water
    Resources Research (in review).
  • Li, X., TD. Scheibe, and W.P. Johnson. 2004.
    Apparent decreases in colloid deposition rate
    coefficient with distance of transport under
    unfavorable deposition conditions a general
    phenomenon. Environ. Sci. Technol., 38
    5616-5625.
  • Redman, J.A., S.L. Walker, and M. Elimelech.
    2004. Bacterial adhesion and transport in porous
    media Role of the secondary energy minimum,
    Environ. Sci. Technol., 381777-1785.
  • Tufenkji, N., J.A. Redman, and M. Elimelech.
    2003. Interpreting deposition patterns of
    microbial particles in laboratory-scale column
    experiments, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37 616-623.
  • Tufenkji, N., Elimelech, M. 2005. Breakdown of
    colloid filtration theory Role of the secondary
    energy minimum and surface charge
    heterogeneities. Langmuir 21 841-852.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com