Improving Administrative Data for Public Reporting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Improving Administrative Data for Public Reporting

Description:

Length of stay. Patient disposition. Admission source & type. Admission month. Charges ... present on admission (POA) and those that originate during the hospital stay ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: ahrq
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improving Administrative Data for Public Reporting


1
Improving Administrative Data for Public
Reporting
  • Anne Elixhauser
  • Joe Parker
  • Michael Pine
  • Roxanne Andrews
  • September 9, 2008

2
Outline
  • Background and rationale
  • Summary of two prior studies
  • Potential safety events present on admission?
  • Adding clinical information to administrative
    data
  • Problems in POA coding California example
  • Screens for detecting these problems
  • Supporting the enhancement of administrative
    claims data through state pilots

3
Administrative, or Billing Data
  • Patient demographics (age, sex)
  • Diagnoses procedures
  • (ICD-9-CM, DRG)
  • Expected payer
  • Length of stay
  • Patient disposition
  • Admission source type
  • Admission month
  • Charges

UB-92 (UB-04) Billing Form
4
12 States Use AHRQ QIs for Hospital Reporting to
the Public
Oregon
Wisconsin (part of state)
Vermont
New York
Massachusetts
Iowa
Ohio
Utah
Colorado
Kentucky
Texas
Florida
5
Limitations of Administrative Data
  • Lack clinically important information
  • Limited to ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes
  • Do not distinguish between diagnoses present on
    admission (POA) and those that originate during
    the hospital stay
  • Questions regarding use of only administrative
    data for hospital-specific reporting
  • Inadequate risk adjustment additional data
    needed to predict individual patients risk of
    mortality
  • Concern about penalizing providers with the
    sickest patients

6
Tension Between Value of Data and Cost of
Obtaining the Data
  • New York and California provide POA coding for
    diagnoses now required for Medicare patients
    and many states will collect for all
  • Pennsylvania hospitals provided chart-abstracted
    clinical detail
  • Hospital concern about costs of medical record
    abstraction
  • Electronic medical records not yet poised to
    provide data efficiently
  • Exception Lab data

7
How Often are Potential Patient Safety Events
Present on Admission?
  • Study aimed at using POA information to determine
    what effect it will have on AHRQ Patient Safety
    Indicators
  • Examined face validity of POA coding in two
    states California (CA) and New York (NY)
  • Study reported in
  • Houchens R, Elixhauser A, Romano P. How often are
    potential patient safety events present on
    admission? Joint Commission Journal on Quality
    and Patient Safety. March 2008.

8
Percent of patient safety events remaining after
POA diagnoses were removed
Based on California data.
9
Impact of Adding Clinical Data to Administrative
Data
  • Assess impact of incrementally adding
  • POA codes for diagnoses
  • Lab values on admission
  • Increased number of diagnosis fields
  • Improved documentation (ICD-9-CM codes)
  • Vital signs
  • More difficult to obtain clinical data

10
Study Reported in
  • Pine M, Jordan HS, Elixhauser A, et al.
    Enhancement of claims data to improve risk
    adjustment of hospital mortality. JAMA 2007
    267(1)71-76.
  • Jordan HS, Pine M, Elixhauser A, et al.
    Cost-effective enhancement of claims data to
    improve comparisons of patient safety. Journal
    of Patient Safety 2007 3(2) 82-90.
  • Fry DR, Pine M, Jordan HS, et al. Combining
    administrative and clinical data to stratify
    surgical risk. Annals of Surgery 2007 246(5)
    875-885.
  • Pine M, Jordan HS, Elixhauser A, et al. Modifying
    claims data to improve risk-adjustment of
    inpatient mortality rates. Medical Decision
    Making (forthcoming)

11
Indicators Studied
  • Mortality
  • Indicators
  • AAA repair
  • CABG surgery
  • Craniotomy
  • AMI
  • CHF
  • Cerebrovascular accident
  • GI hemorrhage
  • Pneumonia
  • Post-operative patient
  • safety events
  • Pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis
  • Physiologic/metabolic abnormalities
  • Respiratory failure
  • Sepsis

12
Data Used in Incrementally More Complex Models
13
C-Statistics for Mortality Models
14
Numerical Lab Data
  • Results of 22 lab tests entered at least one
    model
  • Results of 14 of these tests entered four or
    more models
  • pH (11)
  • PTT (10)
  • Na (9)
  • WBC (9)
  • BUN (8)
  • pO2 (8)
  • K (7)
  • SGOT (7)
  • Platelets (7)
  • Albumin (5)
  • pCO2 (4)
  • Glucose (4)
  • Creatinine (4)
  • CPK-MB (4)

15
Vital Signs and Other Clinical Data
  • All vital signs entered four or more models
  • Pulse (8)
  • Temp (6)
  • Blood pressure (6)
  • Respirations (5)
  • Ejection fraction and culture results entered two
    models
  • Composite scores entered four or more models
  • ASA classification (6)
  • Glasgow Coma Score (4)

16
Abstracted Key Clinical Findings
  • 35 clinical findings entered at least one model
  • Only three findings entered more than two models
  • Coma (6)
  • Severe malnutrition (4)
  • Immunosuppressed (4)
  • 14 of these clinical findings have corresponding
    ICD-9-CM codes (e.g., coma, malnutrition)

17
Summary of Analyses
  • For some measures, POA coding has a significant
    impact on whether conditions are considered
    patient safety events
  • Administrative data can be improved at relatively
    low cost by
  • Adding POA modifiers
  • Adding numerical lab data on admission
  • Improved ICD coding

18
Other Enhancements
  • Link to vital statistics
  • Link across settings
  • Readmissions
  • Episodes of care
  • Todays focus POA and lab data
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com