Biodiversity Cooperation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Biodiversity Cooperation

Description:

Annex III: exporting country can list species as requiring export permits. Trade in Elephant Products? Banned in 1990 under Annex I ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: land8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biodiversity Cooperation


1
Biodiversity Cooperation
2
CITES
  • CITES (1973) Convention on International Trade
    in Endangered Species of Fauna and Flora
  • Regulates trade in living species and products
    derived from them
  • Annex I threatened with extinction both export
    and import permits are required
  • Annex II not yet but may become threatened with
    extinction unless trade is regulated monitoring
    and export permits
  • Annex III exporting country can list species as
    requiring export permits

3
Trade in Elephant Products?
  • Banned in 1990 under Annex I
  • Should ban be partially lifted for South Africa,
    Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe? On Annex II since
    1997-99, but no trade
  • Yes capable of sustainable management
    opportunity and actual cost of trade
    restrictions
  • No will be back to pre-1990 practices in states
    with weak management intrinsic value of wildlife

  • Is it just to punish sustainable states for the
    failures of weak states?

4
The Convention on Biological Diversity The Great
North-South Divide (Rio 1992)
  • South
  • Oppose free access to biological resources
  • Application of IPR to technologies based on local
    resources
  • Tech transfer
  • Additional financial resources for biodiversity
    conservation
  • Bio-safety
  • North
  • BD global resource
  • IPR fundamental
  • Control over financial/technology transfers
  • Not too much money too fast
  • Bio-safety not a strictly biodiversity issue

5
Provisions
  • Sovereign right over biodiversity resources
  • Genetic resources granted according to mutually
    agreed terms
  • IPR are supportive and dont run counter to the
    conventions objective
  • Identification, monitoring, and scientific
    assessment
  • National plans and programs
  • Integration of biodiversity consideration in
    other policies
  • Weak monitoring and compliance system
  • In force 1993, about 188 parties.

6
Global Environmental Facility (GEF)
  • Main financing mechanism established first on
    an experimental basis
  • Cover incremental costs
  • For climate projects additionality principle
  • For biodiversity recipient commitment?

7
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
  • Institutions Represented on MA Board
  • Consultative Group on International Agricultural
    Research (CGIAR)
  • Convention for the Conservation of Migratory
    Species of Wild Animals (CMS)
  • Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
    Nations (FAO)
  • Global Environment Facility (GEF)
  • International Council for Science (ICSU)
  • Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
  • UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)
  • UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
    (UNFCCC)
  • United Nations Foundation
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and
    Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
  • World Bank
  • World Conservation Union (IUCN)
  • World Health Organization (WHO)

8
Cartagena Protocol on BiosafetyNegotiations
  • Miami group US, Canada, Argentina, Australia,
    Chile, Uruguay
  • Minimal regulation (cover only LMOs for
    deliberate release)
  • Against precautionary principle/trade
    restrictions
  • Like minded group Developing countries (without
    Argentina, Chile, Uruguay)
  • All LMO should be regulated
  • Advance Informed Agreement (AIA), or AIA-type
    rules for all LMOs
  • EU
  • Right to restrict LMP imports under the
    precautionary principle (in conditions of
    scientific certainty)
  • Compromise group Japan, Mexico, Norway, South
    Korea, Switzerland, East Europeans, Singapore,
    New Zeeland

9
Biosefety Protocol
  • Advance Informed Agreement (AIA) for LMOs for
    deliberate release into the environment (e.g.
    seeds, etc.).
  • No AIA for GM products GM tomatoes or ketchup
    made of GM tomatoes
  • Biosafety Clearing House for LMO domestic
    approvals, which importing countries can choose
    to consult
  • Shipment documentation stating presence of LMOs
    for commodities
  • Broadly endorsees pre-cautionary principle
  • lack of scientific certainty ..shall not
    prevent the Party from taking a decision, as
    appropriate, with regard to the import of the
    living modified organisms.(art. 10.6 and
    11.8)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com