The Extended Mind - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

The Extended Mind

Description:

First, let's clarify the question a little. ... Vehicles are the mental processes which subserve, or make possible, particular thoughts. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:273
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: dur9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Extended Mind


1
The Extended Mind
  • Advanced Topics in Mind and Knowledge Lecture 6

2
Varieties of Externalism I
  • The debate over semantic externalism questions
    whether mental content is individuated purely
    according to internal factors (ones in our
    heads/brains/bodies).
  • But what about the thoughts which possess this
    content? Both sides of the semantic debate have
    tacitly assumed that internalism regarding
    thoughts is true.
  • Is this the case?

3
Varieties of Externalism II
  • First, lets clarify the question a little.
    Hurley (1998) distinguishes between contents
    and their vehicles. So far weve concentrated
    on contents, but what are vehicles?
  • Vehicles are the mental processes which subserve,
    or make possible, particular thoughts.
  • The content of a thought tells us what it is. Its
    vehicle tells us how it happens (Hurley 2006).

4
The Extended Mind I
  • Clark and Chalmers (1998) argue for externalism
    regarding mental vehicles, using two thought
    experiments tetris and Otto.
  • Tetris involves rotating shapes to fit them
    together without leaving any gaps. Intuitively,
    there are two ways we could do this
  • Using our imagination to visualise a rotation.
  • Pressing a button to produce a rotation.
  • The first case looks like a mental process, and
    the second not.

5
Tetris, Cyborgs and Martians
  • But what about these further cases
  • A cyborg has the computational machinery from (2)
    implanted in his head.
  • Would we then classify the rotation as a mental
    process? Maybe, maybe not.
  • A Martian whose natural brain includes the
    machinery in (2) and (3).
  • Surely in this case we have a mental process?

6
The Extended Mind II
  • The extended mind hypothesis invites us to treat
    (2), (3) and (4) as equivalent the only
    difference being whether the mental process
    occurs inside the head or not.
  • But isnt this a significant difference?
  • Perhaps it isnt. According to functionalism,
    what matters for cognition is a particular role
    being filled, not what fills that role. Why
    should we think that what fills the role needs to
    be in our heads?

7
Ottos Memory I
  • But image rotation is a relatively peripheral
    mental process maybe externalism is true in
    such cases, but not for central cognitive
    processes involving beliefs and desires etc.
  • Clark and Chalmers second example suggests not.
  • Otto has mild Alzheimers and so a poor memory
    he carries a notebook in which he records
    information.

8
Ottos Memory II
  • On hearing of an exhibition, Otto checks the
    address (53rd St.) in his notebook and goes
    there.
  • Compare Inga, who remembered where the exhibition
    was and went.
  • Clark Chalmers both had the same belief (that
    the exhibition was on 53rd St.) even before Otto
    checked his notebook.
  • So Ottos long-term beliefs arent all in his
    head.
  • And if Ottos arent, then neither are ours!

9
Objections and Replies
  • The Extended Mind seems to polarise opinions
    its often regarded as obviously false, or
    obviously true.
  • There have been a number of objections made, many
    of which run parallel to responses to the
    arguments for semantic externalism. Well
    consider a couple here.

10
The Control Objection
  • Loosely parallels narrow content
  • Even if external objects and processes are
    sometimes involved in cognition, isnt it
    internal biological processes which control the
    others, and have the final say?
  • Reminiscent of Cartesian theatre in which a
    homunculus observes the internal workings of the
    body, and does all the real work.
  • Why identify the control mechanism with the
    agent? (Clark 2003, forthcoming).
  • There may be no processes which have the final
    say (Dennett 1995).

11
Compatibilism
  • Similarly to two-factor theories of content, it
    may be that mental processes are both internal
    and external.
  • Stalnaker (forthcoming) observes that external
    processes (e.g. diaries) are publicly available
    and susceptible to sabotage, so we tend to be
    circumspect in using them. This is quite unlike
    access to internal resources.
  • Clark (forthcoming) replies that we do not always
    use external resources cautiously, and that is
    enough to support vehicle externalism.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com