Lecture 3_4. The budget of the European Union - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 3_4. The budget of the European Union

Description:

The subsidiarity principle. Article 5 (ex 3b) of the Maastricht TEU ... An economic perspective on subsidiarity. Subsidiarity is about discovering the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: alanma4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 3_4. The budget of the European Union


1
Lecture 3_4. The budget of the European Union
  • Lecture objectives
  • to discuss the principles of fiscal federalism
  • to describe the structure and characteristics of
    the EU budget
  • to review the policy debates surrounding the EU
    budget regarding expenditure, revenue and the
    contributions of member states
  • to evaluate future options for the EU budget in
    the context of further EU integration

2
The subsidiarity principle
  • Article 5 (ex 3b) of the Maastricht TEU
  • In areas which do not fall within its exclusive
    competence, the Community shall take action, in
    accordance with the principle of subsidiarity,
    only if and in so far as the objectives of the
    proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved
    by the Member States and can therefore, by reason
    of the scale or effects of the proposed action,
    be better achieved by the Community.
  • Any action by the Community shall not go beyond
    what is necessary to achieve the objectives of
    this Treaty.

3
An economic perspective on subsidiarity
  • Subsidiarity is about discovering the appropriate
    level of government for the administration of
    economic functions
  • A clear preference for decentralised
    decision-making
  • On political grounds, a preference for a more
    devolved process of decision-making as being more
    democratic
  • On economic grounds, that decisions are more
    likely to be effective and to accord with
    citizens preferences

4
The economics of fiscal federalism(multi-tier
government)
  • Arguments for centralisation
  • (positive or negative) spillovers
  • economies of scale, influence and increased
    effectiveness of action at a higher national
    level
  • Any benefits from centralisation must be set
    against any additional costs (e.g.weaker controls
    on higher level agencies)
  • Apply these arguments to the main public economic
    functions
  • the allocative, redistributive and stabilisation
    functions
  • subject to the constraint of free internal trade
    and factor movements

5
Applying the economics of fiscal federalism to
the EU
  • Allocative functions
  • These arise in the context of market failures,
    e.g. public goods, imperfect markets,
    externalities
  • May be shared between EU and member states
    depending on the existence of spillovers and
    economies of scale in implementation
  • Redistribution functions
  • Scope for redistribution by Member States
    severely circumscribed by existence of a single
    market, arguing for assignment to the Union level
  • Stabilisation function (monetary and fiscal
    policy)
  • Internal market requires exchange rate stability
    as difficult to achieve through co-operation,
    there is an argument to shift (some) macro policy
    to Union level

6
Some characteristics of the EU budget
  • EU budget is very small - around 1.2 of EU GDP
    compared to total general government expenditure
    amounting to around 50 of EU GDP
  • Legal requirement that EU budget must balance in
    each year. This rules out use of the budget for
    demand management purposes, even disregarding its
    small size.
  • Budgetary power jointly shared by the Council and
    Parliament
  • Annual budget cycle now conducted within the
    framework of multi-annual financial perspectives

7
EU sources of budget revenue
8
Structure of EU budget spending
9
The relative burden on member states
  • Arguments about the principle and feasibility of
    juste retour - should member states get back
    what they put in?
  • Imbalances arise because member states have
    different propensities to contribute revenue
    (esp. the VAT contribution) and different
    abilities to draw down expenditure.
  • Highlighted by UK accession - budget debates in
    the 1980s dominated by the UK rebate.
  • Now a more general issue, with Germany and the
    Netherlands arguing that their net burdens are
    unreasonable

10
(No Transcript)
11
Future EU budget issues
  • Is the size of the EU budget adequate?
  • in the light of fiscal federalist principles
  • in the light of next EU enlargement to the East
  • Should the EU have additional own resources?
  • How to introduce greater budget equity between
    member states?
  • 1998 Commission report Financing the European
    Union explored options regarding the introduction
    of new own resources and introducing greater
    budget equity
  • proposals include introducing national
    co-financing of CAP aids and extension of the UK
    correction mechanism to other net contributors

12
Debate over the 2007-2013 Financial Perspective
  • The Commissions Medium Term Proposal 2003
  • Commission Report on Own Resources System 2004
  • See website for references

13
Conclusions
  • The EU does not have the institutions of a
    federal state there is a blend of
    supranationalism and intergovernmentalism in the
    Community method
  • There is considerable evidence of both widening
    and deepening of the Unions economic competences
    in successive Treaty revisions
  • Conclusions of the theory of fiscal federalism
    would suggest a somewhat different assignment of
    powers between the Union and member states than
    what actually exists, as well as a larger budget,
    the topic of the next lecture.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com