Chapter 7: Aboriginal Peoples: Rethinking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 7: Aboriginal Peoples: Rethinking

Description:

To unravel the historical disadvantages of aboriginal peoples and how Canadians ... A supra-municipal level of government including control over policing, education, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: nit1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 7: Aboriginal Peoples: Rethinking


1
Chapter 7 Aboriginal Peoples Rethinking the
Relationship
Presented By Christina Divitkos, Antoniette
Alfano, Sonia Lopes, Yvonne Scarangella
2
Table of Contents
  • Click to go to..

Home Page
Agenda
Goal of Chapter
Two Models
Nisgaa Final Agreement
The First Shall Be Last
Contesting the Terrain
Categories of Aboriginal Peoples
Conclusions
Toward A New Social Contract
3
Agenda
  • Word Search Ice-Breaker
  • Feature PowerPoint Presentation
  • Handout
  • Movie
  • Aboriginal Squares Game
  • Discussion Questions

4
Goal of the Chapter
  • To unravel the historical disadvantages of
    aboriginal peoples and how Canadians often
    perceive them as a social problem in need of
    government intervention. However, the oppressed,
    social and economic conditions of aboriginal
    peoples may be a Canadian problem, as aboriginal
    people were forcibly incorporated into a system
    that continues to deny, exclude and exploit them.

5
Two Models To The So-Called IndianProblem
  • The Autonomy Model
  • Living together separately
  • Government to government relations are proposed
    that acknowledge the fundamental autonomy of
    aboriginal peoples, with a corresponding right to
    aboriginal models of self determination
  • The Assimilation Model
  • Unless they assimilate into the mainstream,
    aboriginals will continue to suffer from poverty
    and underdevelopment

6
  • Nisgaa Self-Government
  • The Nisgaa First Nations of Central BC have
    looked to Ottawa since 1885 to redress the
    unlawful surrender of their land to the Crown
  • Here are some of the actual terms of the Nisgaa
    Final Agreement in May 2000
  • 5500 members of bands who live 800 kilometers
    north of Vancouver a land base of 1900 kilometres
  • Control of forest and fishery resources
  • 200 million in cash
  • Release from Indian Act provisions
  • A supra-municipal level of government including
    control over policing, education, community
    services and taxes
  • They will receive forest and timber cutting
    rights
  • Oil and Mineral Resources
  • 21.5 million to purchase boats and equipment

7
Criticisms of the Nisgaa FinalAgreement
  • This provides the Nisgaa Nations of British
    Columbia with more autonomy and self-government
    than it constitutionally deserves
  • It confers benefits unavailable to other
    Canadians based solely on culture or skin colour
  • Prohibits non-Nisgaa from voting for the regions
    administration, thus disenfranchising local
    residents who may be taxed without representation
  • There is a third order of government-where
    citizens live by different rules than other
    citizens

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
8
The First Shall Be Last
  • The term aboriginal itself refers to the
    original or first occupants of this country
  • Aboriginal peoples are first in those social
    areas that count least (unemployment, under
    education, suicide) but barely first in matters
    such as wealth, power and privilege

9
Canadas Aboriginal Peoples
  • Terms used to categorize aboriginal peoples
    include
  • Indian
  • Native
  • Status Indian
  • Aboriginal
  • Treaty Indian
  • Non-treaty
  • C-31s
  • Non-status
  • Inuit
  • Metis
  • All these terms are legalistic divisions rather
    than cultural or national distinctions

10
Categories of Aboriginal Peoples
  • Status Indian
  • Membership to status Indian is defined
  • Admittance to a general registry in Ottawa
  • Affiliation with one of 633 bands
  • Entitlement to residence on band reserve lands
  • Jurisdiction under the Indian Act
  • Responsibility for status Indian is with federal
    government
  • The majority of status Indians live on reserves
  • Non-Status Indian
  • Persons of aboriginal ancestry are classified as
    non-status if their ancestors failed to register
    under the Indian Act, signed a treaty with
    federal authorities or were taken off the
    register and enfranchised for some reason
  • They do not live on reserves
  • They are scattered in small towns and large
    cities across Canada

11
Categories of Aboriginal Peoples
  • Inuit
  • They enjoy a special relationship with the
    government but never signed a treaty arrangement
    or registered under the Indian Act
  • At local levels they are governed by municipal
    councils
  • Inuit interests at national level are represented
    by the Inuit Tapirisat of Canada
  • Metis
  • They comprise the offspring (and descendents) of
    mixed European-aboriginal unions

12
Socio-Economic Status
  • Aboriginals remain at the bottom of the
    socio-economic heap
  • Housing is inadequate
  • Unemployment is a major cause of poverty
  • Deterioration of aboriginal cultural values
  • Numerous aboriginal languages are under the
    threat of disappearing
  • There are also psychological effects
  • Domestic abuse is so endemic within aboriginal
    communities
  • There is also a suicide rate of six times the
    nation average
  • Infectious diseases like tuberculosis are
    prevalent
  • Infant mortality rates are about 60 percent
    higher than the national average
  • Alcohol and substance abuse

13
(No Transcript)
14
Urban Aboriginals
  • Reasons for migrating to the city are numerous
    but often reflect push factors (lack of
    resources, opportunity and excitement) and pull
    forces related to employment, education and
    lifestyle
  • Structural, social and cultural factors are also
    important

15
Aboriginal Policy
  • One main question is whether government policies
    contribute to the social problems in aboriginal
    communities
  • Accommodation
  • The Royal Proclamation 1763 may be seen as laying
    down a blueprint for defining aboriginal
    peoples-Crown relations
  • According to the Act, the principles of
    partnership, mutual recognition and
    non-interference were to guide the Crowns
    relationship with Aboriginal peoples

16
  • 2. Assimilation
  • The French and British explorers were few in
    number and militarily weak and the benevolence of
    the aboriginal allies was crucial for survival
  • Termination of the war of 1812 with the US
    eliminated the need for aboriginal allies thus
    rendering them expendable and subject to
    expedient actions
  • Legislation served as an assimilationist tool in
    controlling aboriginal peoples
  • The Indian Act was passed in 1876
  • 3. Integration
  • An official commitment to assimilation merged
    with the principles of integration as a blueprint
    for reform
  • The White Paper proposed to terminate the special
    relationship between aboriginal peoples and the
    Crown

17
  • 4. Devolution
  • A general commitment to the principles of
    devolution eventually replaced the policy vacuum
    in the aftermath of the White Paper fiasco
  • In 1986 the government announced a devolutionary
    program of community-based, municipal style
    self-government in conjunction with Cabinet
    approved guidelines for community
    self-sufficiency
  • 5. Conditional Autonomy
  • Current government policy objectives are aimed at
    exploring the implementation inherent aboriginal
    self-government rights

18
Toward A New Social Contract
  • Three themes appear recurrent throughout this
    process of
  • renewal and radical reform
  • Taking Aboriginal Rights Seriously
  • Aboriginal peoples want to live in a just and
    equal society where they have the same rights as
    all citizens but they also demand their
    differences complement citizenship rights as the
    basis for reward or relationships
  • Aboriginal peoples have the claimed the right to
    be the same and the right to be different

19
  • 2. Promoting self-determination through
    self-governance
  • Key elements include control over the process and
    power of local governance, the attainment of
    cultural sovereignty and a realignment of
    political relations around formal self-governing
    arrangements in key jurisdictional areas related
    to power, privilege and resources
  • Self-governance refers to the allocation of power
    among constituent units self government is an
    institutional expression of this relationship
  • 3. Acknowledging Aboriginal Title and Treaty
    Rights
  • For aboriginal people treaties reaffirmed their
    autonomy as political communities
  • Treaties were viewed as semi-sacred and mutually
    binding contracts involving a reciprocal exchange
    of rights and responsibilities

20
Contesting the Terrain
  • Resistance has shifted from a focus on survival
    and consolidation to challenging the distribution
    of power within a reconstituted state
  • Aboriginal people do not want to separate from
    Canada in a territorial sense but they also
    reject any move toward assimilation with a
    corresponding diminution of their unique status
    as self-determining political communities

21
Unblocking the Impasse Constructive Engagement
  • One of the more striking developments in
    aboriginal peoples-state relations is a growing
    reliance on restitutional claims-making
  • There has been the emergence of the constructive
    engagement model of interaction to replace the
    claims-making model

22
  • The following are foundational principles which
    are critical to the constructive engagement
    model
  • Aboriginal people do not aspire to sovereignty
  • Aboriginal people are not looking to separate or
    become independent
  • Aboriginal peoples are neither a problem for
    solution nor a need to be met
  • Acknowledging the status of aboriginal peoples as
    fundamentally autonomous political community is
    critical in crafting a constructive engagement
  • Power sharing is pivotal in advancing
    co-operative engagement and co-existence

23
  • 6. Concerns over jurisdiction cannot be taken
    lightly. Control and power must be allocated
    along clear lines
  • 7.Constructive engagement accepts as an absolute
    minimum need for aboriginal self-determination
    over jurisdictions related to land, identity and
    political voice
  • 8. Innovative patterns of belonging such as
    shared sovereignty are critical when two groups
    live in the same country but neither wants to
    belong to the state dominated by the other
  • 9.Placing constructive engagement at the center
    of a relationship entails a fundamental
    rethinking in sorting out the goodies
  • 10.Constructive engagement are anchored in the
    notion that aboriginal differences must be taken
    seriously
  • 11.Conciliation must be central to any
    constructive engagement

24
Conclusions
  • The distance traveled by aboriginals has been
    impressive
  • They have recoiled from the brink of dependency
    and disappearance to reclaim a pivotal role in
    the reconstruction of Canadian society
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com