Title: Chapter 7: Aboriginal Peoples: Rethinking
1Chapter 7 Aboriginal Peoples Rethinking the
Relationship
Presented By Christina Divitkos, Antoniette
Alfano, Sonia Lopes, Yvonne Scarangella
2Table of Contents
Home Page
Agenda
Goal of Chapter
Two Models
Nisgaa Final Agreement
The First Shall Be Last
Contesting the Terrain
Categories of Aboriginal Peoples
Conclusions
Toward A New Social Contract
3Agenda
- Word Search Ice-Breaker
- Feature PowerPoint Presentation
- Handout
- Movie
- Aboriginal Squares Game
- Discussion Questions
4Goal of the Chapter
- To unravel the historical disadvantages of
aboriginal peoples and how Canadians often
perceive them as a social problem in need of
government intervention. However, the oppressed,
social and economic conditions of aboriginal
peoples may be a Canadian problem, as aboriginal
people were forcibly incorporated into a system
that continues to deny, exclude and exploit them.
5Two Models To The So-Called IndianProblem
- The Autonomy Model
- Living together separately
- Government to government relations are proposed
that acknowledge the fundamental autonomy of
aboriginal peoples, with a corresponding right to
aboriginal models of self determination
- The Assimilation Model
- Unless they assimilate into the mainstream,
aboriginals will continue to suffer from poverty
and underdevelopment
6- Nisgaa Self-Government
- The Nisgaa First Nations of Central BC have
looked to Ottawa since 1885 to redress the
unlawful surrender of their land to the Crown - Here are some of the actual terms of the Nisgaa
Final Agreement in May 2000 - 5500 members of bands who live 800 kilometers
north of Vancouver a land base of 1900 kilometres - Control of forest and fishery resources
- 200 million in cash
- Release from Indian Act provisions
- A supra-municipal level of government including
control over policing, education, community
services and taxes - They will receive forest and timber cutting
rights - Oil and Mineral Resources
- 21.5 million to purchase boats and equipment
7Criticisms of the Nisgaa FinalAgreement
- This provides the Nisgaa Nations of British
Columbia with more autonomy and self-government
than it constitutionally deserves - It confers benefits unavailable to other
Canadians based solely on culture or skin colour - Prohibits non-Nisgaa from voting for the regions
administration, thus disenfranchising local
residents who may be taxed without representation - There is a third order of government-where
citizens live by different rules than other
citizens
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
8The First Shall Be Last
- The term aboriginal itself refers to the
original or first occupants of this country - Aboriginal peoples are first in those social
areas that count least (unemployment, under
education, suicide) but barely first in matters
such as wealth, power and privilege
9Canadas Aboriginal Peoples
- Terms used to categorize aboriginal peoples
include - Indian
- Native
- Status Indian
- Aboriginal
- Treaty Indian
- Non-treaty
- C-31s
- Non-status
- Inuit
- Metis
- All these terms are legalistic divisions rather
than cultural or national distinctions
10Categories of Aboriginal Peoples
- Status Indian
- Membership to status Indian is defined
- Admittance to a general registry in Ottawa
- Affiliation with one of 633 bands
- Entitlement to residence on band reserve lands
- Jurisdiction under the Indian Act
- Responsibility for status Indian is with federal
government - The majority of status Indians live on reserves
- Non-Status Indian
- Persons of aboriginal ancestry are classified as
non-status if their ancestors failed to register
under the Indian Act, signed a treaty with
federal authorities or were taken off the
register and enfranchised for some reason - They do not live on reserves
- They are scattered in small towns and large
cities across Canada
11Categories of Aboriginal Peoples
- Inuit
- They enjoy a special relationship with the
government but never signed a treaty arrangement
or registered under the Indian Act - At local levels they are governed by municipal
councils - Inuit interests at national level are represented
by the Inuit Tapirisat of Canada
- Metis
- They comprise the offspring (and descendents) of
mixed European-aboriginal unions
12Socio-Economic Status
- Aboriginals remain at the bottom of the
socio-economic heap - Housing is inadequate
- Unemployment is a major cause of poverty
- Deterioration of aboriginal cultural values
- Numerous aboriginal languages are under the
threat of disappearing - There are also psychological effects
- Domestic abuse is so endemic within aboriginal
communities - There is also a suicide rate of six times the
nation average - Infectious diseases like tuberculosis are
prevalent - Infant mortality rates are about 60 percent
higher than the national average - Alcohol and substance abuse
13(No Transcript)
14Urban Aboriginals
- Reasons for migrating to the city are numerous
but often reflect push factors (lack of
resources, opportunity and excitement) and pull
forces related to employment, education and
lifestyle - Structural, social and cultural factors are also
important
15Aboriginal Policy
- One main question is whether government policies
contribute to the social problems in aboriginal
communities - Accommodation
- The Royal Proclamation 1763 may be seen as laying
down a blueprint for defining aboriginal
peoples-Crown relations - According to the Act, the principles of
partnership, mutual recognition and
non-interference were to guide the Crowns
relationship with Aboriginal peoples
16- 2. Assimilation
- The French and British explorers were few in
number and militarily weak and the benevolence of
the aboriginal allies was crucial for survival - Termination of the war of 1812 with the US
eliminated the need for aboriginal allies thus
rendering them expendable and subject to
expedient actions - Legislation served as an assimilationist tool in
controlling aboriginal peoples - The Indian Act was passed in 1876
- 3. Integration
- An official commitment to assimilation merged
with the principles of integration as a blueprint
for reform - The White Paper proposed to terminate the special
relationship between aboriginal peoples and the
Crown
17- 4. Devolution
- A general commitment to the principles of
devolution eventually replaced the policy vacuum
in the aftermath of the White Paper fiasco - In 1986 the government announced a devolutionary
program of community-based, municipal style
self-government in conjunction with Cabinet
approved guidelines for community
self-sufficiency - 5. Conditional Autonomy
- Current government policy objectives are aimed at
exploring the implementation inherent aboriginal
self-government rights
18Toward A New Social Contract
- Three themes appear recurrent throughout this
process of - renewal and radical reform
- Taking Aboriginal Rights Seriously
- Aboriginal peoples want to live in a just and
equal society where they have the same rights as
all citizens but they also demand their
differences complement citizenship rights as the
basis for reward or relationships - Aboriginal peoples have the claimed the right to
be the same and the right to be different
19- 2. Promoting self-determination through
self-governance - Key elements include control over the process and
power of local governance, the attainment of
cultural sovereignty and a realignment of
political relations around formal self-governing
arrangements in key jurisdictional areas related
to power, privilege and resources - Self-governance refers to the allocation of power
among constituent units self government is an
institutional expression of this relationship - 3. Acknowledging Aboriginal Title and Treaty
Rights - For aboriginal people treaties reaffirmed their
autonomy as political communities - Treaties were viewed as semi-sacred and mutually
binding contracts involving a reciprocal exchange
of rights and responsibilities
20Contesting the Terrain
- Resistance has shifted from a focus on survival
and consolidation to challenging the distribution
of power within a reconstituted state - Aboriginal people do not want to separate from
Canada in a territorial sense but they also
reject any move toward assimilation with a
corresponding diminution of their unique status
as self-determining political communities
21Unblocking the Impasse Constructive Engagement
- One of the more striking developments in
aboriginal peoples-state relations is a growing
reliance on restitutional claims-making - There has been the emergence of the constructive
engagement model of interaction to replace the
claims-making model
22- The following are foundational principles which
are critical to the constructive engagement
model - Aboriginal people do not aspire to sovereignty
- Aboriginal people are not looking to separate or
become independent - Aboriginal peoples are neither a problem for
solution nor a need to be met - Acknowledging the status of aboriginal peoples as
fundamentally autonomous political community is
critical in crafting a constructive engagement - Power sharing is pivotal in advancing
co-operative engagement and co-existence
23- 6. Concerns over jurisdiction cannot be taken
lightly. Control and power must be allocated
along clear lines - 7.Constructive engagement accepts as an absolute
minimum need for aboriginal self-determination
over jurisdictions related to land, identity and
political voice - 8. Innovative patterns of belonging such as
shared sovereignty are critical when two groups
live in the same country but neither wants to
belong to the state dominated by the other - 9.Placing constructive engagement at the center
of a relationship entails a fundamental
rethinking in sorting out the goodies - 10.Constructive engagement are anchored in the
notion that aboriginal differences must be taken
seriously - 11.Conciliation must be central to any
constructive engagement
24Conclusions
- The distance traveled by aboriginals has been
impressive - They have recoiled from the brink of dependency
and disappearance to reclaim a pivotal role in
the reconstruction of Canadian society