Business Model Team

1
Business Model Team

• Executive Board
• October 16, 2003

2
Business Model Team Members
CO Larry Ferguson, Team Leader D1 John Barker
D2 Dave Sheffield D3 Steve
Corbitt D4 James Wolfe D5 Gary
Bass D6 Margaret Callahan D7
Gloria Harmony CO Ken Leuderalbert
Supporting members D1 Nancy Bassett
D3 Greg Vickery D4 Leo Bray
D4 Lois Danis D5 Sybil
Jordan D5 Dave Brant
D6 Brian Arena CO Nikki Nims
CO Rick Kelley
3
Goal

• Implement the
• FDOT Business Model
• Statewide

4
Possible Approaches

• Training
• Sterling
• What We Value
• Strategic Planning
• Cascading Business Plans
• Define Structure
• Linkages

5
Business Model DeploymentStructure

• Organizational Deployment
• Deploy business plans through organizations,
  follow chain of command.
• Functional Deployment
• Deploy business plans through functions.

6
Business Model Deployment Structure

• Organizational
• Deploy business plans through organizations,
• follow chain-of command.
• Advantages
• - Good management control.
• Disadvantages
• - No linkage across entities.
• - Difficult to expand functional goals.
• - Not business result based.

7
Business Model Deployment Structure

• Functional
• Deploy business plans through functions.
• Advantages
• -Strong linkages.
• -Follows business results.
• -Involves District in State plans.
• Disadvantages 26 Functions
• -Senior managers not I.E.
  Materials, Design
• directly involved.

8
FDOT Functions

• Core Processes
• Plan Produce Maintain and
  Operate
• Planning Design PTO
• OMB Surveying
  Maintenance
• Right-of-Way Traffic Operations
• Deliver Consultant Mgmt. Safety
• Construction EMO MCC
• Materials PDPM
  Tolls

9
FDOT Functions

• Support Functions
• EOO Support Services
• Human Resources Inspector General
• General Counsel Contract/Prof.
  Services
• Information Systems Public
  Information
• Financial Services Performance
  Management

10
Functional Deploymentin Materials

• Tier 1. FDOT Plan
• Strategic Objectives
• FTP
• Short Range Component
• Tier 2.
• Materials (Function) Plan
• Organization Plans
• Tier 3. Materials Units
• District Materials
• State Materials Office

11
Development of Materials Plan

12
Statewide Materials Plan

• Initial face-to-face meeting September 2002
• 12-person team formed consisting of each District
  Materials Engineer, the State Materials Engineer,
  and State Materials Office key staff.
• The plan format was adopted at this meeting.
• (See Attachment 4.)

Development of Materials Plan
13
First Month

• Weekly teleconferences.
• Most of the Objectives were defined.
• Some of the Activities were defined.

Next 2 Months

• Weekly teleconferences continued.
• Most action items were developed.
• Objectives assigned to four 3-person sub-teams.
• Each sub-team had District representation.
• Sub-teams developed further detail

Development of Materials Plan
14
By December 2002

• Draft Business Plan completed.
• Objectives and activities were developed.
• Many work plans, time lines, and additional teams
  were formed.

Development of Materials Plan
15
Keys to Success

• Commitment from all team members
• Team composed of District and Central Office
  staff.
• Business Plan is a living document and a working
  plan.
• Linkage to other Plans

Development of Materials Plan
16
Figure 1 Business Plan Pyramid
FDOT Business Model Deployment
FDOT Plan1
FTP Strategic Objectives Short-Range Component
Statewide Function Plans2
Three Tier Model
Tier 1. FDOT Plans Tier 2. Statewide Function
Plans, These are statewide plans for
functions such as Planning, Construction, etc
There are twenty-six functions identified.
Organization Plans. These are
organizationally based plans such as District or
Division level plans that include more than one
function. Tier 3. Functional Unit Plans.
These are unit plans supporting the Statewide
Function Plans and the Organization Plans. These
are typically at District Department level.
These are example plans.
Organization Plans2
Statewide Operations Plan
Statewide Materials Plan
Functional Unit Plans3
District Materials
District Design
17
Business Plan Format

• Plans should
• Use a standard format.
• Show application of the seven Business Model
  criteria.
• Include linkages to higher level or related
  plans.
• Be more detailed and specific at lower levels.

18
Proposed Deployment Schedule

• Complete Business Plans for
• Core Process Function
• Tier 2 Function Plans by 07/01/04
• Tier 3 Functional Unit Plans by 07/01/05
• Support Function
• Tier 2 Function Plans by 07/01/05
• Tier 3 Functional Unit Plans by 07/01/06

19
Deployment Support Issues

• Training Materials
• Technical assistance to Functional Teams
• Central location to submit plans
• Office to review the plans.
• The Business Model Team will be active in
  planning and carrying out implementation.
• Principal staff support will be from the District
  and Central Performance Management Offices.

20
Future Developments

• Business Plans should be posted and accessible on
  the FDOT Intranet.
• Linkages between plans should be coded.
• A standard numbering system for goals should be
  applied throughout the plans
• The deployment structure lends itself to future
  improvements.

21
Business Model TeamRecommendation

• Deploy the Business Model by developing
  functionally based business plans on the proposed
  schedule.
• Business plans should use the standard form
  emphasizing the Business Model criteria.

Adopted by the Executive Board, 10/16/03
22
Business Model Deployment
Questions?