Prescription for Excellence: How Innovation is Saving Medicare - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Prescription for Excellence: How Innovation is Saving Medicare

Description:

Prescription for Excellence: How Innovation is Saving Medicare – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: Mich983
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prescription for Excellence: How Innovation is Saving Medicare


1
Prescription for Excellence How Innovation is
Saving Medicare
  • The Third Age Centre
  • May 12, 2008 Fredericton NB
  • Michael M. Rachlis MD MSc FRCPC
  • www.michaelrachlis.com

2
Outline
  • There are three main public analyses of Medicare
    but none reflect Canadians true feelings about
    Medicare
  • The problem is not public funding, too little
    money, or too much money
  • The main problem is poor quality of care which is
    related to the pre-Medicare way we organize
    service delivery
  • Good News about Canadas System!

3
There are three main views of Medicare but none
are satisfying to Canadians
4
Medicare View 1 Globe and Mail
  • We established Medicare when we were young,
    healthy, and altruistic. The economy was growing
    rapidly. It worked pretty well then.
  • Now we are old, sick, and the economy is
    stagnant. Medicare doesn't work very well. Wait
    lists go from the North Pole to the US border.
    Health care costs are going through the roof. The
    public sector is too inefficient to make it work.
  • We now have to be cruel to be kind. We should
    allow some privatization of finance and
    profitization of delivery to 'save' Medicare.

5
Medicare View 2 Toronto Star
  • At the beginning, the federal government paid
    half the bills and everything worked pretty well.
  • The Federal government gave up 50-50 cost sharing
    in 1977, and then hacked funding until 1997.
    Medicare was starved. This led to service
    erosion, privatization of finance, and increased
    use of for profit delivery.
  • Now we need more public money, more enforcement
    of the Medicare legislation, and curbs on for
    profit delivery to save Medicare.

6
Medicare View 3 National Post
  • Medicare was always a bad idea.
  • Health care costs are out of control. But a
    government run health system is like the Beverly
    Hillbillies trying to run IBM. Despite huge
    costs, services are terrible.
  • Its not too late to do the right thing. Lets
    privatize and profitize as fast as possible.
    Maybe a dumb, rich American will buy it.

7
Outline
  • There are three main public analyses of Medicare
    but none reflect Canadians true feelings about
    Medicare
  • The problem is not public funding, too little
    money, or too much money
  • The main problem is poor quality of care which is
    related to the pre-Medicare way we organize
    service delivery
  • Good News about Canadas System!

8
What do Canadians want to hear?
  • Medicare was the right road to take
  • Resources arent the problem. Costs are not out
    of control but neither is the system drastically
    underfunded
  • Medicare was designed for another time and was
    implemented as a compromise
  • There are public sector solutions for every one
    of Medicares problems

9
Medicare was the right road to take
  • Canada US had same health care system and the
    same health status until the mid-1950s
  • Now there are 47 million US uninsured
  • We spend less than the US but we usually get more
    services
  • Now Canadians live 2 1/2 years longer and our
    infant mortality rate is 30 lower.
  • Medicare boosts Canadian business
  • Health care costs 1.5 of Canadian
    manufacturers payroll and 9 of those in US

10
(No Transcript)
11
S Woolhandler Int J H Serv 20043465-78.
12
Health Care Costs are not out of Control but
neither is the Health Care System Drastically
Underfunded
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Outline
  • There are three main public analyses of Medicare
    but none reflect Canadians true feelings about
    Medicare
  • The problem is not public funding, too little
    money, or too much money
  • The main problem is poor quality of care which is
    related to the pre-Medicare way we organize
    service delivery
  • Good News about Canadas System!

18
Canada Has Big Quality Problems -- But No Bigger
Than Other countries
  • Misuse
  • Canadian Adverse Events Study
  • 9000 to 24,000 preventable hosp deaths/yr
  • (GR Baker et al. CMAJ 20041701678-1686)
  • Overuse
  • Medication and the elderly
  • 10 of diagnostic imaging
  • Under use
  • Chronic disease management and prevention
  • Cervical and breast cancer screening

19
Do one-quarter of older Canadian women need to
take Benzodiazepines?
  • Do we care what were paying for?

20
The Canadian system has long waits for care
21
Germany, CAN, US
22
Chronic diseases have a major impact
  • Chronic diseases account for 70 of all deaths.
  • Chronic diseases account for more than 60 of
    health care costs.

23
Canada deals poorly with chronic diseases
  • lt 30 of Canadians hypertensives have their blood
    pressure properly controlled
  • 60 of diabetics have gone gt 1 yr without an eye
    exam or a check for proteinuria
  • 60 of asthmatics are not properly controlled
  • Up to one in six seniors is re-admitted to
    hospital within 30 days of discharge

24
Trying to deliver health services without
adequate primary health care is like pulling your
goalie in the first period!
25
1945 -- Swift Current, Saskatchewan
  • Prepaid funding Services available on a
    universal basis, with little or no charge to
    users.
  • Integrated health care delivery with acute care,
    primary care, home care, and public health.
  • Group medical practice with doctors working in
    teams with nurses, social workers and other
    providers.
  • Democratic community governance of health care
    delivery by local boards.

26
What happened to the vision?
  • Despite Swift Current Regions success,
    Saskatchewan MDs wanted independent practice paid
    on fee for service
  • Saskatchewan MD strike of 1962

27
What happened to the vision?
  • Despite the Hall Commission, the feds only cover
    medical care
  • The provinces develop patchwork a quilt of
    coverage
  • Dr. John Hastingss 1972 Report recommends
    re-organizing the delivery system but its mainly
    ignored
  • The models that were implemented, e.g. Sault Ste.
    Marie Group Health Centre and Saskatoon Community
    Clinic, prove to be fonts of innovation
  • Canada inspires other countries policies but not
    ours
  • Lalonde Report, Ottawa Charter of Health
    Promotion, etc
  • The Canada Health Act stops the bleeding
  • But its only temporary

28
What happened to the vision?
  • 1990s cutbacks harm a vulnerable system
  • Waits and delays worsen
  • More specialties and special units
  • Cant admit people for investigations
  • The 2002 Romanow Commission isnt able to
    establish a new political consensus
  • The 2004 Fed/Prov/Terr Health Accord provides
    lots of money but little direction
  • The 2005 Chaoulli case opens the door to more
    private health care

29
Are we ready for Tommy Douglass Second Stage of
Medicare?
30
I am concerned about Medicare not its
fundamental principles- but with the problems we
knew would arise. Those of us who talked about
Medicare back in the 1940s, the 1950s and the
1960s kept reminding the public there were two
phases to Medicare. The first was to remove the
financial barrier between those who provide
health care services and those who need them. We
pointed out repeatedly that this phase was the
easiest of the problems we would confront.
Tommy
Douglas 1979
31
The phase number two would be the much more
difficult one and that was to alter our delivery
system to reduce costs and put the emphasis on
preventative medicine. Canadians can be proud
of Medicare, but what we have to apply ourselves
to now is that we have not yet grappled seriously
with the second phase.
Tommy Douglas 1979
32
Are we finally ready for the Second Stage of
Medicare?
  • Stage One Provide financial support for care
    when people get sick.
  • Stage Two The more difficult task ---keeping
    people well.

33
The Second Stages Essence delivering health
services differently to keep people well
34
Second Stage of Medicare Principles
  • Essential Principles What we Want1. Population
    Health Focus 2. Equitable3. Patient-Centred
  • 4. Effective5. Accessible6. Safe
  • Instrumental Principles How we get
    there7. Efficient8. Accountable9. Appropriately
    resourced
  • 10. Non-profit

35
Accessible Patients should get timely care. Waits
should be continuously reduced
  • Advanced Access same day service
  • Penticton, Toronto, Saskatchewan
  • Hamilton shared Care Mental Health
  • 145 GPs, 80 counsellors, 17 psychiatrists
  • 1100 ? in patients seen for mental health
  • 70? in referrals to psychiatrists
  • Alberta Bone and Joint Pilot Project
  • Reduced wait times for hip and knee replacements
    from 19 months to 11 weeks

36
Why do we need the Second Stage of Medicare now?
  • Aging of the population and chronic disease put
    extra pressures on an inefficient system
  • The workforce is getting older and sicker
  • Family doctors are exiting comprehensive care
  • Nurses and other health workers face burnout
  • We need to improve the sustainability of the
    system

37
Many attribute the quality problems to a lack of
money. Evidence and analysis have convincingly
refuted this claim. In health care, good quality
often costs considerably less than poor quality.
  • Fyke Report 2001 (Saskatchewan)

38
Quality provides sustainability
  • Alberta aftercare program for congestive heart
    failure patients leaving hospital reduced future
    hospital use by 60 with 2500 in overall net
    cost savings per participant.
  • New Westminster's Royal Columbian Hospital
    reduced post heart surgery pain complications by
    80 and length of stay by 33.
  • BCs Reference Drug Program kept Vioxx as a
    second line drug and saved 23 million per year
    and dozens of lives.

39
Quality provides sustainability
  • Quality workplaces improve the health of workers
    and patients
  • Quality workplaces could be worth a one years
    graduating class of nurses

40
For profit patient care tends to be more
expensive and of poorer quality see PJ
Devereaux et al -- but the most effective
argument is Fuhgetaboutit!
41
Summary
  • Medicare was the right road to take
  • Resources arent the major problem. Costs are not
    out of control but neither is the system
    drastically underfunded. We need transition
    funding
  • Medicare was designed for another time and was
    implemented as a compromise
  • If Douglas had had his way in the 1940s and 1950s
    Medicare would have many fewer problems today
  • There are public sector solutions for every one
    of Medicares problems The Second Stage of
    Medicare

42
Courage my Friends, Tis Not Too Late to Make a
Better World! Tommy Douglas
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com