Segmented Band Mechanism for Itinerant Ferromagnetism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Segmented Band Mechanism for Itinerant Ferromagnetism

Description:

Segmented Band Mechanism for Itinerant Ferromagnetism. J. E. Gubernatis1 and C. D. ... Stefan Institute and FMF, University of Ljubljana ... Ternary Ce Borides. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: jegube
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Segmented Band Mechanism for Itinerant Ferromagnetism


1
Segmented Band Mechanism for Itinerant
Ferromagnetism
  • J. E. Gubernatis1 and C. D. Batista1
  • J. Bonca2
  • 1Los Alamos National Laboratory
  • 2J. Stefan Institute and FMF, University of
    Ljubljana

PRB, 63, 184428 (2001) PRL, 88, 187203 (2002)
2
Outline
  • New model of itinerant ferromagnetism.
  • Realization in the periodic Anderson model.
  • Numerical results.
  • Relevance to experiment.
  • Concluding remarks.

3
Features of the New Mechanism
  • Explicit exchange forces are absent.
  • Band features are important.
  • Two bands are involved.
  • Hybridzation is essential.
  • Spin alignment occurs via the same physics as a
    Hunds coupling.
  • Compensation of local moment is a property of a
    restricted set of band states and not a
    consequence of Kondo compensation.
  • The mechanism disappears in infinite dimensions.

4
Periodic Anderson Model
  • The Hamiltonian
  • Two bands (U0)

5
Familiar Mechanism
  • Local moment regime V ?? td ?? ?f ? EF,
    tf 0 (f orbital below the d band), fourth-order
    canonical transformation yields
  • JRKKY V4 td2/U 5, very small

6
Some Observations U0, V?? W ?f
  • Mixed valent regime
  • Two subspaces in each band.
  • Predominantly d or f character.
  • Size of cross-over region ? V²/W.
  • Very small.

7
New Mechanism
  • Take U 0,
  • EF ? ?f and in lower band.
  • Electrons pair.
  • Set U ? 0.
  • Electrons in mixed valent state spread to
    unoccupied f states and align.
  • Anti-symmetric spatial part of wavefunction
    prevents double occupancy.
  • Kinetic energy cost is proportional to ?.

8
New Mechanism
  • A nonmagnetic state has an energy cost ? ? to
    occupy upper band states needed to localize and
    avoid the cost of U.
  • Ferromagnetic state is stable if ? ?? ?.
  • TCurie ? ?
  • By the uncertainty principle, a state built from
    these lower band f states has a restricted
    extension.
  • Not all ks are used.

9
New Mechanism
  • Mechanism for partial saturation of effective
    moment,
  • Moment is compensated within electrons in the d-
    band
  • Absence of mechanism in infinite dimension,
  • In infinite dimension the correlated band is
    reduced to an impurity level in an effective
    field.

10
Typical Numerical Results
11
Finite size scaling
12
Stability of FM vs. - finite size analysis
13
Stability of FM state vs. U
14
Stability of FM state vs. V
15
Numerical Consistency
  • Observed ferromagnetic behavior in the mixed
    valent regime of the periodic Anderson model is
    consistent with this mechanism.
  • In 1, 2 and 3 dimensions, ground-state is found
    by the Constrained-Path Monte Carlo method.
  • In one dimension phase diagram agrees
    qualitatively with the one in calculated by DMRG.
  • Key Quantity The electron density ?n(k)?
    projected onto the ? and ? states mirrors that of
    the mechanism.

16
Numerical Consistency 1D
17
Numerical Consistency 2D
18
Experimental Relevance
  • Ternary Ce Borides.
  • CeRh3B2 highest TCurie (115oK) of any Ce
    compound with nonmagnetic elements.
  • Small magnetic moment.
  • Unusual magnetization and TCurie as a function of
    (chemical) pressure.
  • Hexaborides ?
  • Effective mass change, coexistence of localized
    and itinerant electrons,
  • Uranium chalcogenides (UxXy , X S, Se, or Te).
  • Some properties similar to Ce(Rh1-x Rux)3B2

19
Phase Diagram of Ce(Rh1-xRux)3B2
St. Berger et al. PRB,64 134404 (2001).
20
Ce(Rh1-xRux)3B2
  • Volume shrinks as a function of x.
  • Increasing x lowers M and TCurie
  • Peak in M mirrored by peak in Cp
  • Raising T initially increase ordering and ordered
    state has more entropy.
  • Similar effect seen in uranium chalcogenides.

21
Ce(Rh1-xRux)3B2
  • Reduction of M.
  • If CeRh3B2 is in a 4f-4d mixed valent state and
    EF ? ?f, TCurie ? ?.
  • With Ru doping, EF lt ?f , ? increases, and
    eventually ? ?.
  • Different mechanism, eventually RKKY, dominates.
  • Peak in Cp
  • Thermal excitations will promote previously
    paired electrons into highly degenerate aligned
    states.

22
LaxCe1-xRh3B2
S.A. Shaheen et al., Prb, 31 656 (1985)
  • Volume expands as a function of x.
  • Increasing increases M and lowers TCurie

23
Ce(M1-xXx)3 B2 CeRh3(N1-yYy)2
A.L. Cornelius, PRB 49, 3955 (1994)
24
Concluding Remarks
  • Proposed mechanism steps beyond past approaches.
  • Coulomb interaction Fermi statistics band
    features.
  • Band features set multiple energy scales and
    create a novel opportunity for itinerant
    ferromagnetism.
  • Mechanism operates in a well known lattice model.
  • Established by non-perturbative (not discussed)
    analytical and numerical studies.
  • Mechanism appears qualitatively relevant for some
    f (and d) electron materials.
  • Some important features
  • Predicts Hi Tc, in a metallic state
  • Unusual magnetization and TCurie as a funtion of
    (chemial) pressure
  • Effective mass change at TCurie
  • FM state consists of itinerant and localized
    electrons and also polarized and non-cpolarized
    electrons

25
Concluding Remarks
  • Stability of ferro-magnetic state
  • Adding non-zero tf can stabilize (or destroy)
    the ferromagnetic state.
  • Appearance of anti-ferromagnetic state
  • Adding non-zero tf can generate an anti-
    ferromagnetic state.
  • Antiferromagnetism otherwise occurs only when
    there is nesting.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com