Title: Understanding Structural Mechanisms Of DNA Processing Assemblies
1Understanding Structural Mechanisms Of DNA
Processing Assemblies
- 1. Modularity multiple domains, separate
functions - 2. Multiple contact points XPA
- 3. Modest affinity micromolar contact points
2RPA Coordinated Activity of Modules
70AB
14/32D/70C
Zn
B
A
C
D
RPA70 RPA32 RPA14
NTD
14
CTD
70NTD
32CTD
3Interaction of RPA with XPA
RPA Library RPA14/32 RPA14/32DC RPA14/32/70DN RPA7
0DC RPA32C RPA70N RPA70AB
4RPA Modulates Function inMultiple DNA Repair
Pathways
NER
RPA32
BER
RR
5A Common Mode of Interaction for Different DNA
Repair Proteins
6RPA Drives Assembly and Commitment to a Specific
Pathway of Repair
NER
RPA32
BER
RR
7RPA32C- Built for Dynamic Binding Simple Motif
/ Modest Affinity
- Central, flat hydrophobic surface
- Electrostatic complimentarity at either end of
the binding region
Mer et al., Cell 2000
8Understanding Structural Mechanisms Of DNA
Processing Assemblies
- 1. Modularity multiple domains, separate
functions - 2. Multiple contact points XPA
- 3. Modest affinity micromolar contact points
- 4. Multiple interactions multiple proteins, DNA
9Using Concepts To Build ModelsUDG A Modular
Damage Recognition Protein
- Multiple contacts with relatively modest
affinity - Modularity allows integration of multiple
functions
10Continuing to Build View of NER RPA
Interactions with XPG and XPF/ERCC1
1. Recognize damage
2. Unwind duplex
3. Locate lesion
4. Excise 5
RPA
5. Excise 3
3,4,5.
- Cannot all be independent sites on RPA!
- Direct competition for sites, other mechanisms?
11Understanding Structural Mechanisms Of DNA
Processing Assemblies
- 1. Modularity multiple domains, separate
functions - 2. Multiple contact points XPA
- 3. Modest affinity micromolar per contact point
- 4. Multiple interactions multiple proteins, DNA
- Forward progression structural transitions
12Binding of ssDNA
13RPA Binds DNA Non-Specifically
- Needs to bind ssDNA regardless of sequence!!
14Structure Shows Base-Specific Contacts!
OB-Fold
Base-specific contacts
- Needs to bind all ssDNA sequences!!! (X-ray and
NMR)
15NMR Reveals Solution Same as Crystal
- NMR can be used to study ssDNA binding properties
16NMR Assessment of 3 ssDNA Oligomers
- RPA70AB binds all ssDNA in the same manner
17ssDNA Binding Site Is Highly Dynamic
S2
S2
- Binding of ssDNA quenches motions
18Mechanism for Non-Specific Binding
HypothesisThe intrinsically flexible binding
site is able to remodel in response to the
properties of different DNA bases
19Binding of Proteins
20What Structural Mechanisms Allow Progression Of
SV40 Replication?
- Analyze interactions of RPA with SV40 Large
T-antigen
21The SV40 T-ag Origin Recognition Domain Binds to
RPA70AB
Trypsin T-ag
Trypsin T-ag
Trypsin T-ag
Trypsin T-ag
Trypsin T-ag
Trypsin T-ag
Trypsin
Trypsin
Control
Control
Trypsin
Control
RPA-B
RPA-A
RPA-AB
22Affinity of RPA70AB For SV40 T-ag Origin
Recognition Domain Is Modest
23NMR Analysis of Structure and Binding
- Not all residues affected, 100 mM affinity
24Mapping Binding Sites on Structures
T-ag131-259
RPA70AB
Bochkarev et al., 1997
Luo et al., 1996
- Discrete binding sites, modest affinity
- T-ag binds remote from the ssDNA binding site
25Is T-ag an Allosteric Effector of RPA?
T-ag131-259
RPA70AB
Bochkarev et al., 1997
Luo et al., 1996
26Binding of T-ag Alters Affinity for ssDNA
Normalized RPA Fluorescence
d-CTTCACTTCA T-ag131-259 d-CTTCACTTCA
Molar Ratio of ssDNA
- Pre-loading T-ag increases RPAs affinity for
ssDNA - Converse releasing T-ag lowers affinity for
ssDNA
27Structural Stabilization From Binding
- Tighter binding gives rise to equal or BETTER!!
spectra in gt40 kDa ternary complex
28What is the mechanism for allostery?
29Mechanism Independent Domains
RPA70AB
RPA70A RPA70B
- A and B domains behave as independent modules
- (in the absence of binding partners)
30Mechanism ssDNA Binding RequiresAlignment of A
and B Domains
ssDNA bound with 5-3 polarity
Different interdomain angles
domains aligned
31Entropic Contribution To Allostery
RPA70AB
Pre-loading T-ag on RPA70AB pre-aligns the A and
B domains
Bochkarev et al., 1997
Lower penalty for loss of entropy higher DNA
affinity
32Model for Dynamic Progression From Unwinding to
Priming
T Ag
- Pol-prim out-competes T-ag for RPA, which causes
release of ssDNA and hand-off to DNA primase
step
33Next Step Extend Analysis to Primase
- Identify interaction modules, characterize
binding
34The Essential Recombination Factor Rad51N Also
Interacts With RPA70AB
51
51
51
51
51
51
RAD52
51
RPA
- Are the structural mechanisms the same as for
T-ag?
35Pre-loading Rad51N on RPA70AB Affects the Binding
Affinity for ssDNA
36But Rad51 Binds Differently to RPA70AB!!
15N RPA70AB
Aihara et al., 1999
Bochkarev et al., 1997
RPA70AB
Rad511-93
Mechanism must be different Allostery versus
direct competition for sites?
37Structural Mechanisms of DNA Processing
Assemblies Key Concepts
- 1. Modularity multiple domains, separate
functions - 2. Multiple contact points XPA, T-ag, DNA
primase - 3. Modest affinity micromolar per contact point
- 4. Multiple interactions multiple proteins, DNA
- 5. Structural transitions direct competition
between sites allosteric coupling
38Model for Progression ofDNA Processing Assemblies
- Linked weak, short-lived interactions provide
high affinity but keep interactions dynamic - Such dynamic interactions can be invaded and
rapidly disassembled ? progression