ASTER Ingnierie - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

ASTER Ingnierie

Description:

Tester channel. Tester channel. Virtual channel. 5. ASTER Ingenierie. Interconnect Test Analysis ... Tester access. Non-scan nets with no tester. access. Group ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: christo92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ASTER Ingnierie


1
ASTER Ingénierie
February 6, 2002 - Mr. Christophe LOTZ
  • TESTWAY
  • Test Point Saver

2
Context
  • Why? Because of the dramatic increase in device
    density on PCB.
  • What for ? To reduce the number of required Test
    Points whilst still maintaining a high level of
    fault coverage.
  • How? TestWay includes
  • A test efficiency analysis according to test
    access, either identified at the layout stage or
    declared at the schematic capture stage.
  • A proposal to reduce the number of test points
    required to achieve good fault coverage.
  • A proposal to increase test efficiency by adding
    a limited number of test points.
  • Cluster identification define device groups to
    be tested together using a reduced number of test
    points.

3
Accessibility
  • In most of design cycles, test access is chosen
    after the layout phase. It is calculated
    according to physical constraints such as pad
    sizes, vias diameter, tracking
  • As one physical access per net is no longer
    possible, a virtual access can be used to keep an
    acceptable fault coverage.

4
Accessibility
  • Using a Virtual channel
  • A net is testable when a logic state can be
    assigned through one channel and the result
    observed by a second one.
  • Up and down stream chains must be designed so
    that signal propagation is easy (Boundary-scan,
    serial resistor, ).

5
Interconnect Test Analysis
  • The ITA module performs net classification in
    order to allocate each a priority level for test
    access.
  • TestWay identifies extra test points which could
    be removed. It also suggests design modifications
    that would reduce the test points requirements.

6
Interconnect Test Analysis
  • Ground nets
  • Power nets
  • Unused pins
  • Pins only connected to a
  • pull resistor
  • Pure Boundary-Scan nets

TDI
TDO
TDI
TDO
  • Partial Boundary-Scan nets
  • Tester access

Vcc
  • Non-scan nets with no tester
  • access

Vcc
TDI
TDO
7
Interconnect Test Analysis
  • Define you test access requirement using
  • Group or Sub-Group
  • Class or Property
  • Device
  • Pin
  • Net
  • Custom Rules

8
Device Test Analysis
  • The DTA module verifies each device based on
    overall test access. The theoretical test
    efficiency may be given by the following formula
  • Coverage

number of testable pins
number of pins
9
Device Test Analysis
  • The DTA module identifies clusters when
    partitioning the board into independent
    functional blocks.
  • A cluster is a block of devices tested as one,
    using one set of test vectors and limited access.
  • Internal access to this block is not essential
    for high fault coverage.
  • Device type analysis is an important parameter
    when defining easily testable clusters.
  • Boundary-scan clusters have some of their access
    points connected to partial boundary-scan nets.

10
Device Test Improvement
  • The DTI module tries to improve the coverage by
    adding a limited number of test access points.
  • Best order to increase the coverage step by step
  • Customer driven objective using device reference
    or classes.

11
At layout level
Electrical View
Physical view
TestWay
Test point locations
Check fault coverage according to the real
physical accesses.
12
At schematic level
Electrical View
Physical view
TestWay
Select the absolutely required test access points
to guarantee a good fault coverage.
Test points required
13
Combined approach
Electrical View
Physical view
Schematic Capture
Layout
CIM
TestWay
Test points required
Test point locations
Check the required test accesses versus real test
point locations.
Fault coverage report
14
Cost saving on fixture
  • If you save 30 of Testpoints per fixture
  • Nail 100 mils US 3.5
  • 50mils US 10
  • Fixture 2000 nails (100 mils) 3.5 7000
  • 200 nails (50 mils) 10
    2000
  • 9000
  • . Save around 2700 per fixture
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com