Investment%20Treaties - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Investment%20Treaties

Description:

Counsel Latin America & the Caribbean. Caterpillar Inc. ... such investment, and activities associated therewith, on a basis no less ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: bonnied4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Investment%20Treaties


1
Investment Treaties
  • University of Miami
  • School of Law
  • September 10, 2008
  • Mark Anderson
  • Counsel Latin America the Caribbean
  • Caterpillar Inc.

2
Investment Treaties Should be Considered in 2
Situations
  • Contracts with governmental entities
  • Includes state-owned companies
  • Sales of Cat products
  • Other, e.g., land purchase (Panama)
  • Governmental interference
  • expropriation
  • unfair/discriminatory treatment, regulation

3
Advantages
  • Substantive protections for investments
  • International arbitration of claims and disputes
  • Especially important in developing countries
  • Avoid local courts, local favoritism
  • Overcome issues of sovereign immunity
  • Enforceability of arbitration awards
  • New York Convention on enforcement of arbitral
    awards
  • Arbitral award judgment of local court where
    enforced
  • Very limited grounds to refuse enforcement
  • No review of the merits

4
Washington Convention on the Settlement of
Investment Disputes between States and Nationals
of Other States
  • Entered into force in 1966
  • 155 countries have signed, 143 ratified
  • Vast majority of developing countries have
    ratified
  • Exception India (but India does have many BITs)

5
Washington Convention Article 25
  • Establishes jurisdiction for ICSID
    (International Center for Settlement of
    Investment Disputes)
  • Jurisdiction extends to
  • disputes arising from an investment
  • between a State/subdivision and a national of
    another State
  • where the parties consent in writing to submit
    the dispute to ICSID
  • Each of these issues is defined in the relevant
    investment treaty, not in the Washington
    Convention itself

6
Multilateral Investment Treaties and BITs
  • Many MITs (e.g., NAFTA, CAFTA, etc.)
  • Over 2,300 BITs are in place between various
    countries around the world
  • Purpose of BITs
  • Encourage investment, esp. in developing nations
  • Reduce risks to private investors through
    protections
  • Enforce safeguards via international arbitration
    (usually ICSID)
  • Each BIT is somewhat unique, although they share
    many similarities
  • The U.N. Conference on Trade and Development
    maintains a list of BITs as well as text on many
    of them
  • See www.unctad.org

7
Panama
  • A Case Study

8
(No Transcript)
9
U.S. Panama BIT
  • Signed in 1982, became effective in 1991
  • protocol (amendment) added in 2000 to account
    for Panamas ratification of the Washington
    Convention

10
U.S. Panama BIT
  • Key features
  • investment defined very broadly
  • Equity, debt, service, investment contracts
  • Tangible and intangible property, mortgages,
    liens and pledges
  • IP rights
  • Licenses and permits
  • Any right conferred by law or contract

11
U.S. Panama BIT
  • No discrimination, MFN Each party shall permit
    and treat such investment, and activities
    associated therewith, on a basis no less
    favorable than that accorded in like situations
    to investment or associated activities of its own
    nationals or companies, or of nationals or
    companies of any third country, whichever is the
    more favorable . . .

12
U.S. Panama BIT
  • Anti-discrimination, MFN clause
  • government cannot give preferential treatment to
    domestic or foreign investors
  • allows investor to analyze other BITs that host
    country has with other third countries in order
    to claim further protections
  • example U.S.-Egypt BIT lacks fair and
    equitable treatment clause, but MFN bootstraps
    this in from other BITs that Egypt has (e.g.,
    U.K.)

13
U.S. Panama BIT
  • Fair and equitable treatment, no arbitrary or
    discriminatory measures
  • No restrictions on current and capital transfers
  • No expropriation, either directly or indirectly,
    except with prompt and adequate compensation

14
U.S. Panama BIT
  • Note on expropriation tribunals have defined
    expropriation broadly to encompass
    governmental action that effectively neutralizes
    the benefit of an investment. Indirect
    expropriation can occur when measures taken by
    the government deprive the investor in whole or
    in significant part of the use or reasonably
    expected economic benefit of an investment.

15
U.S. Panama BIT
  • Dispute resolution
  • investment disputes defined very broadly
  • Alleged breach of investment contract
  • Violation of rights granted under the BIT
  • Unless parties agree otherwise, at private
    companys or nationals option, investment
    disputes are resolved by ICSID arbitration
    (Panama automatically consents)

16
U.S. Panama BIT
  • . . . Any company duly incorporated,
    constituted or otherwise duly organized under the
    applicable laws and regulations of either Party
    or a political subdivision thereof but that,
    immediately before the occurrence of the event or
    events giving rise to the dispute, was owned or
    controlled by nationals or companies of the other
    Party, shall be treated as a national or company
    of such other Party.

17
How did BIT affect Panama land purchase contract?
  • Buyer (Cat) is entitled to protections of
    U.S.-Panama BIT (even though purchaser is
    Panamanian sub)
  • All disputes arising from Cats investment to be
    resolved by arbitration (ICC) in a neutral
    location
  • ICC arbitration prevails over all procedure from
    moment an investment is made by Cat
  • Avoids statutory process for resolution of
    government contract claims

18
Summary of Take-Aways
  • Consider investment treaties when negotiating
    with government entities or state-owned companies
  • Know what protections are available
  • Dont waive important rights
  • Consider defining important terms from the BIT in
    the contract
  • investment
  • National of what country?

19
Summary of Take-Aways
  • Consider investment treaties when facing unfair,
    punitive or arbitrary government actions
  • Direct or indirect expropriation
  • Unfair treatment vis-à-vis local nationals or
    other foreign nationals (if MFN)

20
Summary of Take-Aways
  • Consider the full spectrum of available treaties
  • Example India
  • No U.S. BIT, but BITs w/ U.K., Switzerland, etc.
    (arbitration via UNCITRAL)
  • BITs define who is a national in different ways
    (e.g., Switzerland-India BIT has no ultimate
    control feature as in the U.S.-Panama BIT)

21
Questions?
  • Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com