Title: Prospects for the Thames Gateway
1Prospects for the Thames Gateway
Michael Ward CEO Kent Thameside LSE London
Seminar Feb 19th 2007
21 Contents
1 Contents
- Map
- Context
- The Thames Gateway Interim Plan
- Delivery
- Kent Thameside
- Conclusions
31 Contents
2 Thames Gateway Map
43 Context I Regional Policy
1 Contents
- Despite the regional policies of successive
governments, London and the South East just keep
on growing - Barlow (1940)
- Distribution of Industry Act (1944)
- South East Study (1963)
- National Plan (1965)
- But increasingly difficult to operate anything
like old regional policies in service based
economy
51 Contents
4 Context II London
the London region has embarked on a huge
experiment of quite breathtaking audacity. It is
to become the financial and - in some respects
- the economic capital of the worldIt is driven
entirely by market forces, forces that can be
resisted but which if successfully accommodated
will bring vast benefits to these
islands. Hamish McRae, The Independent, June
7th 2006
65 Context III London
1 Contents
- Planned decentralisation
- County of London Plan (1943)
- First wave New Towns
- Greater London Development Plan (1972/1976)
- Importance of London Plan (2000 and subsequently)
- Explicit rejection of planned decentralisation
- Population and jobs growing invest to cope with
growth - Powers delegated to London
76 Context IV Housing
1 Contents
since London cannot accommodate its own natural
increase, the whole of the population growth of
3½ million will have to be found homes elsewhere
a population increase of well over a third for
the area outside London. (SE Study, 1963) In
the Greater South East, many cannot afford to
purchase a home and there are very severe
shortages of homes to rent for those on low and
moderate incomes As the largest growth area, the
Gateway is now playing a prime role in meeting
needs in the Greater South East and will continue
to do so for the foreseeable future. (Thames
Gateway Interim Plan, 2006)
87 Interim Plan I Purpose
1 Contents
- a strategic framework for the Gateway as a
distinctive social and economic unit, there to
shape and guide investment, decisions and
actions. A framework which joins up development
funding and recurrent expenditure. A framework
which integrates economic, public service and
housing development. - David Miliband, 23 November 2005
91 Contents
8 Interim Plan II Background
- Demand for economic rationale
- Comparison with Northern Way
- Despite commitment to sustainable communities,
concern that programme driven by housing numbers - Comprehensive Spending Review
- Olympics
- Need to move from aspirational targets to hard
forecasts
101 Contents
9 Interim Plan III Economic
- Four Transformational Economic Opportunities
- Canary Wharf jobs to grow from 82000 to 200000
- Gateway Port Cluster Tilbury, Purfleet,
Thamesport and Sheppey Shellhaven - Ebbsfleet Valley new commercial centre
- Stratford City Olympics
111 Contents
10 Interim Plan IV Economic Map
121 Contents
11 Interim Plan V Commitments
- Skills guarantee of progression from level 3 to
level 4 new HE FE - Ambitious green commitments parklands low
carbon development - 160,000 homes (2001-16) up from 120,000
increase mostly in London - Further transport investment.
131 Contents
12 Interim Plan VI Next Steps
- Preparation of costed plan for April 2007
- No firm commitments till spending review July
2007
142 The Delivery Bodies
13 Delivery I Agencies
- 7 local regeneration partnerships/LDVs
- 2 urban development corporations
- 1 Olympic Delivery Agency
- 3 sub regional partnerships
- 3 regional development agencies
- 3 Government Offices
- 2 Regional Assemblies
- 1 Mayor of London/GLA
- 2 County Councils
- London Borough/Unitary and Shire District
Councils - The Department of Communities and Local
Government - Other government departments, the Housing
Corporation, English Partnerships, the Highways
Agency , the Environment Agency, the Countryside
Agency and Natural England - And the Thames Gateway Strategic Partnership
153 The Delivery Bodies Map
14 Delivery II Map
165 Why the different structures?
16 Delivery III Why?
- Thames Gateway is asymmetric
- Circumstances vary from place to place
- Circumstances dictate nature and pace of
development - One size fits all model not appropriate
1717 Delivery IV Local Differences
- Some examples
- The nature of the development opportunity (e.g.
Olympics, CTRL, Port) - Patterns of land ownership is there a public
sector land assembly role? - The structure of local government
- 3 different systems - London
- - 2
tier - -
unitary -
181 Contents
18 Kent Thameside I Map
1919 Kent Thameside II The Golden Triangle
- 3 clusters of development
- New community and office centre at Ebbsfleet
- Renewal of historic centres of Dartford and
Gravesend - 9 miles of Thames waterfront
- .. And Bluewater
2020 Kent Thameside III The Opportunity
- Channel Tunnel Rail Link
- Huge reserves of brownfield land
- Target of 30000 homes and 50000 jobs
- Public Transport Oriented Development- Fastrack
- Acknowledged in draft Strategic Framework as 1 of
4 key Thames Gateway economic transformers - Sustainability if you want to build new homes in
the South East without concreting over the
countryside, this is the sort of place to do it.
2121 Kent Thameside IV - Land Ownership
- Former quarries and cement works
- Major sites in and beyond central area in
possession of Lafarge/Land Securities - No major public sector land assembly role in
Ebbsfleet ( though significant SEEDA role in
support of districts in town centres and
elsewhere)
2222 Kent Thameside V Local Government
Structure
- 2 tier, 2 districts, 2 local planning authorities
- 3 local authorities
- Kent County Council
- Dartford Borough Council
- Gravesham Borough Council
231 Contents
23 Kent Thameside VI Homes and Roads
The Problem
- Planning process for Eastern Quarry and other
major sites stalled - Highways Agency view that capacity of road
network inadequate to support level of planned
new housing development - Article 14 - enables HA to intervene in planning
process to prevent approval - Stalemate for over two years risk of loss of
investor and developer confidence, loss of
momentum, and loss of credibility for gateway
project
241 Contents
24 Kent Thameside VII Homes and Roads
The Potential
Solution
- Effective partnership working between public
sector partners, and with private sector - Package of measures demand management/public
transport/roads - Funded by public private sectors
- Developer contribution via a tariff
- Still a need for a major contribution from
Government
2525 Kent Thameside VIII prospects
- Fastrack buses started March 30 2006 passenger
nos well ahead of forecast second route summer
2007 some evidence of people moving from car to
bus - CTRL Ebbsfleet Station finished summer 2006
- International trains November 2007
- Domestic trains 2009 17 minutes to St Pancras
- Consent for 4.5m sq ft of offices
- Prospect of 16000 jobs at Ebbsfleet by 2016
- Administrative and business centre for Thames
Gateway - An office centre to compete in M25 ring
- First Ebbsfleet housing starts Feb 2007
261 Contents
26 Thames Gateway The Challenges
- Can the Gateway make a major contribution to
increasing housing supply in the South East? - Can the areas long-standing low growth rates be
increased? - Can these aims be achieved while also satisfying
the environmental and social aspirations of the
Interim Plan?
271 Contents
27 Thames Gateway The Prospects
- Positive
- Clear vision with Interim Plan
- Improved structure with appointment of CEO
- Commitment to major infrastructure investment
CTRL/A2/ Olympic Park - Ambitious homes and jobs targets
- But all depends on CSR!