The Open Group and Manageability: An Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Open Group and Manageability: An Overview

Description:

Open Enterprise Systems Management is a strategic objective for TOG ... Objectives of the TOG Initiative. Define an architecture that will drive effective ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: karlsch2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Open Group and Manageability: An Overview


1
The Open Group and ManageabilityAn Overview
Presentation December 1999 Karl Schopmeyer Chair
TOG Management Program Group k.schopmeyer_at_opengro
up.org
2
What is Happening Today?
  • Information is one of the Keys to Management
  • A common Information Model
  • The customer wants management in his terms
  • Applications Management
  • Service Management
  • Business Level Management
  • The Customer wants Enterprise Management, not
    just Point Management -- Service Management, not
    just Technology Management
  • Management is Big Business
  • The Suppliers are beginning to work together

3
Enterprise Management (EM) and The Open Group
  • Open Enterprise Systems Management is a strategic
    objective for TOG
  • Technical and program group devoted to Enterprise
    Management
  • A meeting forum for suppliers and users
  • A partner with other Standards forums
  • Ex. DMTF

4
ESM Objectives
  • Encourage,support and create EFFECTIVE standards
    in Enterprise Systems Management
  • Help advance the art of Enterprise Systems
    Management
  • Communicate between users and suppliers
  • Help the suppliers understand user requirements
  • Help users understand management and open
    management solutions
  • Help users understand the art, practice, and
    standards of Distributed Systems Management

Technology
Education
Business
5
ESM Organization
  • The Program Group (Open attendance)
  • Users and suppliers working together to
  • advance open enterprise management
  • Technical Working Groups
  • Preparation of one technology
  • Specifications, Reference Code, testing, etc.
  • Business Working Groups
  • Business support for a technology area to
    encourage market adoption
  • Branding, Certification, Marketing, documentation

6
Enterprise Management Program - Strategy
  • Build on current program activities, supporting
    technology deployment
  • Software license use management (XSLM)
  • Application response management (ARM)
  • Universal management installation agent (UMIA)
  • Application Information and Control (AIC) (Was
    AMI)
  • Work With WEB Based Enterprise Management (WBEM)
  • New programs with an overall coherence
  • Manageability (Major New Initiative)
  • Service Management
  • Business approach to programs
  • Concept to market adoption

7
Current Work
  • License Management (XSLM Work Group)
  • Universal Management Installation (UMIA Work
    Group)
  • Service Management (Interest Group)
  • Application Response Monitoring (ARM Business
    Group)
  • CIM Schema extensions for UNIX (Work Group)
  • AIC (Application Instrumentation and Control)
    Fast Track
  • Manageability (Interest Group)

8
Open Manageability
  • The objective of the Manageability Initiative is
    to provide
  • A set of standard interfaces and standard service
    definitions for manageability components
    (interfaces between management agents and the
    managed entities) such as events, inventory, etc.
  • A manageability architecture into which these
    APIs and services can fit and which is based on
    the use of CIM as the common data

9
Manageability Background
  • There are NO effective ways to instrument for
    most managed entities today
  • No common SNMP agent instrumentation tools
  • No API to generate events
  • No way for applications to cooperate in
    management
  • No real interfaces to get information to and from
    management systems.
  • Many, multiple and often competing agents

Management today tries to work through whatever
information it can get through external
exploration
10
Manageability is
  • Manageability is the ability to be managed
  • Manageability defines how managed entities
    communicate with management functions
  • Manabeabilitiy is a major interface between
    different constituencies
  • Manager Management Systems
  • Managee (Managed entity) Entity to be managed
    (OS, applications, middleware, components, etc.

Manager
Managee
Manageability
11
Separate Manageability Management
Management vs. Manageability
Definitions or instrumentation that make a
particular IT resource manageable.
Capabilities that takes advantage of these
definitions to actually perform the activities
associated with managing IT resources.
12
Some Rules of Management
  • Capturing correct information and knowing what to
    do with it key to good management
  • Higher level management will require higher level
    information
  • Consistent information semantics must be
    established and preserved
  • Management is low priority in software
    development
  • Management is not important to the app developer
  • If it is difficult, dont do it
  • Management means touching everything in the
    environment, not just some things
  • Today we manage in a hostile environment
  • We take information, it is not given

13
Manageability brings together
  • Management system suppliers
  • Need information to manage
  • Software Providers (Applications and Middleware)
  • Instrument software for management
  • OS suppliers
  • OS instrumentation for management
  • Market advantage through effective application
    instrumentation
  • Customers
  • Need the information Information not available
    today
  • Want simple and effective tools that integrate
    efficiently

But Why hasnt this been done before?
14
We must remember that
  • Different priorities and objectives
  • Manageability (Instrumentation)
  • Simplicity for developers
  • Stability and long life
  • Multiple interface paradigms
  • Management Suppliers
  • Flexibility Functionality will grow
  • Rich information capture
  • Customers
  • Interoperability
  • The Manageability concept lacks an owner
  • Who feels it is important enough to solve the
    problem?
  • Everybody wants something, nobody wants to do it

15
Some Key Characteristics
  • Key characteristics
  • Separate elements with loosely coupled interfaces
  • Provide interface with major Infrastructure
    (WEBM)
  • Extensible interface
  • Rich information model
  • Support required for multiple management system
    architectures (SNMP, WBEM, proprietary, etc.)

16
Manageability needs
  • Manageability needs today
  • The managed components be instrumented
  • There should be a common API(s) so that these
    managed components can communicate with the
    managing systems independently of management
    solution
  • Service definitions so the managed components and
    management system have common understanding of
    service management offers
  • Common mechanism to define the information (CIM)

17
WBEM Managed System
Data Description
Supplier of management data
Transport Encoding
Access
HTTP(S) Server
Data Schema
Applications
Drivers
OS
18
Manageability Framework
19
Manageability Framework
  • Interoperability Layer
  • HTTP-XML
  • LDAP-XML
  • Corba
  • (D)COM
  • CIM Object Manager
  • CIM Schema
  • Pipe (high speed /Bulk Data)
  • Managed Services
  • API (Java, C, etc.)
  • ARM
  • Events
  • Schema
  • ARM
  • Events
  • Etc.
  • Services
  • Schema
  • Api
  • Inventory
  • Performance
  • Events
  • Application Management
  • Service Levels
  • Status
  • etc.

20
Manageability needs
  • Manageability needs today
  • The managed components be instrumented
  • Their be standard API sets so that the managed
    components can communicate independent of
    management solution
  • Service definitions so the managed components and
    management system have common understanding of
    services management offers
  • Common mechanism to use the information (ex. CIM)

21
Disjoint pieces of Manageability
  • No APIs that can provide the interface(s) that
    an applications can instrument to
  • ex. Never established a common API even for
    Events
  • No clear definition of manageability services
  • No clear statement and business case for
    manageability
  • Multitude of competing agents that are often
    incompatible
  • No clear roadmap
  • No buy in from all vendors

22
Manageability Framework Goals
  • An optioned framework that covers all pervasive,
    mobile,desktop, servers computing systems
  • Provides for at least the minimal managed
    capabilities that allows any of the target
    systems to be managed
  • Framework must allow for a range of capabilities
    to cover all devices with a variety of
    capabilities

23
Objectives of the TOG Initiative
  • Define an architecture that will drive effective
    manageability
  • Establish standards for a Management Service
    Provider layer
  • Integrate existing specifications into a larger
    whole
  • Provide an effective interface with Common
    Management Infrastructures (ex. WBEM)
  • Provide specifications for specific components of
    the manageability instrumentation

24
A Manageability Framework
Plugins For Management Interfaces
Management Infrastructure
Management
WBEM
SNMP
Common Manageability Provider Service
Plugins For Interfaces
ARM
DMI
AIC
XSLM
XML
Common Services
Managed Entities
OS
Apps
Middleware
25
Manageability Challenges
  • Get all parties to the table
  • Major Management Suppliers
  • Smaller Management suppliers
  • Application suppliers
  • OS suppliers
  • Users
  • Figure out who can drive this program
  • Management suppliers, App suppliers, etc.?
  • Management of existing apps is still high value
    solution

26
Manageability in TOG Today
  • Already delivering Manageability pieces
  • XSLM Client APIs for license management
  • ARM Client APIs for transaction information
  • UMIA Tool to aid agent installation
  • BUT
  • Not coherent
  • There is no architecture
  • There is no industry leadership for the concepts

27
How can we Accomplish This?
  • GreenField Create new standards
  • Positive We get exactly what we want
  • Negative - Long and difficult
  • FastTrack existing technologies
  • Positive Moves them into the TOG domain
  • Negative Minimum possibility to integrate
  • Work from existing donated base technologies and
    specifications
  • Positive We can modify the starting points
    together
  • Negative There is a real work effort
  • Note We can control what we get through RFIs

28
Open Manageability
UMIA
ARM
Open Manageability Umbrella
AIC
Manageability Program
  • Common Infrastructure
  • Compatible
  • Common view of services

XSLM
From Individual Components
X
Y
Z
UMIA
XSLM
ARM
AIC
Common Provider Services
29
Initiative Status today
  • Agreement on the need and base requirements
  • Looking at alternate technologies
  • Initiating architecture
  • Working with several technologies
  • Java JMX
  • XML based instrumentation
  • Integrating Manageability with
  • Application run-time CIM Schema development
  • TOG AIC extension to integrate with CIM, etc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com