BIODIVERSITY AND PATENTING OF LIFE: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

BIODIVERSITY AND PATENTING OF LIFE: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

Description:

GURDIAL NIJAR. CEBLAW, LAW FACULTY, UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA. 1 ... FASTER IDENTIFICATION OF COMPOUNDS. RAPID DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL USE. MODERN BIOTECH ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:210
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: PTM5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BIODIVERSITY AND PATENTING OF LIFE: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS


1
BIODIVERSITY AND PATENTING OF LIFE PROBLEMS AND
PROSPECTS
  • GURDIAL NIJAR
  • CEBLAW,
  • LAW FACULTY,
  • UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA

2
INTRODUCTION
  • BIODIVERSITY AND PATENTS MEETING OF PATHWAYS

3
BOOST TO BIOD
  • PCR TECHNOLOGY
  • EMERGING NEW IT
  • BIOINFORMATICS
  • FASTER IDENTIFICATION OF COMPOUNDS
  • RAPID DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL USE
  • MODERN BIOTECH
  • IPRS

4
THE INTERFACE
  • 1. SCOPE OF PATENTS LIFE FORMS
  • 2. EXTENSION TO PRODUCTS OF NATURE
  • 3. BREADTH BROAD
  • 4. BASED ON TK
  • 5. BENEFIT SHARING

5
2 PERSPECTIVES
  • 1. IPRS BASED ON TRADITIONAL PATENT LAW
  • 2. EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES REQUIRE RESHAPING

6
INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT
  • 2 BIOD-RELATED TREATIES DEALING WITH
    ABS/BIODIVERSITY CBD IT-PGRFA
  • 2 IPR RELATED TREATIES TRIPS UPOV

7
PATENT LAWS - US
  • PATENTS ON LIFE 1980 Chakrabartys Case
  • BASED ON TREATING LIFE AS CHEMICAL SUBSTANCE
  • HAND OF GOD v. HAND OF MAN
  • PATENTABLE IF GIVEN A NEW FORM, QUALITY,
    PROPERTIES OR COMBINATION NOT PRESENT IN THE
    ORIGINAL IN NATURE

8
CONTD - EUROPE
  • DIRECTIVE ON THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF
    BIOTECHNOLOGICAL INVENTIONS
  • NATURALLY OCCURRING - IF MATERIAL ISOLATED FROM
    NATURE OR PRODUCED BY MEANS OF TECHNICAL PROCESS
  • PROCESS AS WELL
  • IF SUBSTANCE CAN BE CHARACTERISED by structure
    by process etc IF NEW
  • IF INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION OF GENE-SEQUENCEPLANT
    VARIETIES
  • EXCLUSIONS ORDRE PUBLIC OR MORALITY

9
CONTD. - JAPAN
  • FOLLOWED THE US/EU LAW

10
SCOPE
  • PATANTABLE SUBJECT MATTER
  • PRODUCTS OF NATURE
  • BROAD PATENTS

11
BASIS OR JUSTIFICATIONS
  • LIVING MATTER -
  • PRODUCT OF NATURE
  • BROAD PATENTS

12
CRITIQUE OF THE JUSTIFICATIONS
  • LIFE FORMS JUST CHEMICALS? Cf CANADIAN SUPREME
    COURT ONCOMOUSE CASE
  • PRODUCTS OF NATURE BLURRING THE DISTINCTION
  • SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR PATENTING GENES OR NUCLEIC
    ACID
  • SUBJECT TO MUTATION
  • FUNCTION UNCERTAIN, UNPREDICTABLE
  • HUMAN GENES INTEGRAL OR DISTINCT FROM BODY?

13
IMPLICATIONS FOR BIOD
  • 1. IPRS AND THE HOLY GRAIL OF PLANT GENOMICS the
    golden rice case
  • Closure to access key genetic material
  • Food security
  • Cumbersome 40 licences required

14
contd
  • 2. BLOCK ON BREEDING NEW PLANT VARIETIES?
  • RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PATENTS AND PVP HOLDERS

15
  • 3. BROAD PATENTS access to wide segment of
    plant germplasm
  • 4. GENES WITH MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS
  • 5. DISINCENTIVE FOR DOWNSTREAM INVENTIONS

16
  • 6. INDIRECT EFFECTS OF IPRS ON GENETIC EROSION
  • 7. FOOD SECURITY AND LOCAL FARMING COMMUNITIES
  • 8. ACCESS TO TECHNOLOGIES THAT MAKE USE OF
    GENETIC MATERIAL CBD

17
  • 8. EXTENSION OF TERRITORIAL PATENT RIGHTS
  • 9. IPRS AND BENEFIT-SHARING USEFUL TOOL BUT
    extended patentable subject matter - difficulty
    of valuation

18
TK AND PATENTS
  • JUSTIFICATIONS AND CONCERNS
  • 1. ISSUE OF NON-DEPLETETION BY USE BY OTHERS
  • - WHO IS OWNER OF INVENTION?
  • 2. THRUST OF THREAT TO KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM
    integrity of system market value and
    marginalisation

19
SOLUTIONS?
  • MAKING GENE AVAILABLE IN NATRUAL FORM
  • OPPOSITION AND RE-EXAMINATION
  • PRIOR VETTING BY EXAMINERS
  • NEGOTIATING BENEFIT-SHARING IN A 2 PHASE PROCESS
    but problems. Contracts negotiated early also
    before any ABS arrangements in place electronic
    transfers of biomaterials
  • A BALANCE? SEE THE H5N1 VIRUS DEBATE AT THE
    W.H.O.

20
  • 6. NO PATENTS FOR PRODUCTS OF NATURE/LIFE
  • 7. STRICTER REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW
  • 8. LIMITING TO PROCESS PATENTS WHERE NO
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE
  • 9. UTILITY REQUIRMENTS FOR INVENTION.
  • 10. NO PROTECTION OF PRODUCT BY ANY PRPOCESS
  • 11. RESPECT FOR OTHERS EXCLUSIONS

21
  • 12. FOOD CROPS AND FOOD SECURITY
  • 13. ACCESS TO TECHNOLOGIES ON PREFERENTIAL TERMS
  • 14. RESEARCH EXEMPTIONS
  • 15. ARTICLES 14 AND 15 TRIPS
  • 16. NON-RECOGNITION OF IPRS THAT UNDERMINE CBD
    but resistance as in the TRIPS COUNCIL DEBATE

22
FINDING THE BALANCE
  • RIGHTS OF PROVIDERS AND THE RIGHTS OF USERS
  • FOR COMMONS TO BE OPEN versus GREATER PROTECTION
    FOR IPRS
  • THE CBD versus TRIPS

23
YE OLDE WISDOM
  • FOR ALL OUR RELATIONS NOT ONLY THE TWO-LEGGED,
    BUT
  • THE WINGED ONES, THE CRAWLING ONES, THE
    FOUR-LEGGED, THE PLANTS, THE TREES AND THOSE THAT
    LIVE IN THE WATER AND THE AIR,
  • WE MUST FIND THE BALANCE!!
  • THANKSGIVING ADDRESS OF THE IROQUI
  • (Mohawk, Seneca, Cayuga, Onodaga, Oneida,
    Tuscora Nations)

24
END
  • Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com