Nachweis von B0sOszillationen mit dem ATLAS Detektor am LHC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Nachweis von B0sOszillationen mit dem ATLAS Detektor am LHC

Description:

B. Epp1, V.M. Ghete2, E. Kneringer1, D. Kuhn1, A. Nairz3 ... Barrel Toroid. 5. Accuracy on |Vtd| is limited to ~15 % due to theoretical uncertainties. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: EMO70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nachweis von B0sOszillationen mit dem ATLAS Detektor am LHC


1
Nachweis von B0s-Oszillationen mit dem ATLAS
Detektor am LHC
  • ÖPG-JahrestagungWien, 28. 9. 2005

B. Epp1, V.M. Ghete2, E. Kneringer1, D. Kuhn1, A.
Nairz3 1Institut für Experimentalphysik,
Universität Innsbruck 2jetzt Institut für
Hochenergiephysik, ÖAW, Wien 3jetzt CERN, Genf
2
Übersicht über den Vortrag
  • Einführung
  • ATLAS Detektor
  • Theorie, Motivation
  • Hauptteil
  • Analyse
  • Genauigkeit experimenteller Messgrössen
  • Masse, Zerfallseigenzeit
  • Monte-Carlo Programm
  • Amplituden-Scan/Fit
  • Sensitivität der Analyse
  • Ausblick
  • aktuelle Experimente
  • CDF, D0

3
ATLAS installation schedule
4
ATLAS cavern (Sept. 26, 2005)
Barrel Toroid
5
Accuracy on Vtd is limited to 15 due to
theoretical uncertainties.
Can determine Vts/Vtd with 5 theoretical
uncertainty.
6
Due to the size of the CKM matrix elements Dms
gtgt Dmd
7
CKM Matrix
8
Data Challenge 1
software chain
9
Bs0 ? Ds ?
  • Fully reconstruct Bs decay

?
How to know if an oscillation occurred?
_
  • Tag Bs or Bs at production and decay
  • production
  • sign of lepton of decay of (non oscillating)
    B-hadron in opposite hemisphere (level 1 trigger
    ?) B ? ? ? Bs0
  • decay
  • sign of D-meson Bs0 ? Ds

10
Ideal oscillation
11
Oscillation in an experiment
?ms 14 ps1
resolution of t is very important
12
Oscillation?
?ms 24 ps1
13
(No Transcript)
14
d c????t , ?? p/m
proper time resolution
15
Oscillation signal significance
?
16
Extracting information on ?ms from data
  • How to extract the oscillation frequency ?ms from
    the measurements
  • Max. Likelihood method (for parameter estimation)
  • was found to have several disadvantages
  • needs lots of MC
  • sensitivity of analysis not easy to define or
    estimate
  • combination of several analyses is difficult
  • ?ln L w.r.t. minimum or infinity? (different
    results)
  • Amplitude method
  • invented by H.G. Moser from ALEPH
  • 1 1?cos (?mst) ? 1 A?cos (?mst)

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
A limit may be placed in regions of ?ms where
amplitudes of unityare excluded (at 95 C.L.).
21
?md measurement CDF_at_Tevatron
At each value of ?ms in the interesting rangean
amplitude is measured, where an amplitude of
unity indicates a successful observation of
oscillation with that frequency.
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
CDF ?ms Semileptonic Channel
25
CDF ?ms Hadronic Channel
26
?ms CDF World Combined
27
Conclusions
  • Clean measurement of ?ms serves as input to fit
    Bs0 ? J/? ?
  • determination of ??s (among other parameters)
  • Already with 10 fb1 Atlas is capable to achieve
    the sensitivity that is obtained by the SM-fit to
    all available data today
  • The analysis is also sensitive in the SUSY regime
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com