Roads Sector Policy Support Programme Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Roads Sector Policy Support Programme Review

Description:

Determining variable tranche disbursement 10 indicators: Density. ... can be included in the performance indicators for variable tranche disbursement ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: michaell71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Roads Sector Policy Support Programme Review


1
Roads Sector Policy Support Programme Review
  • FINDINGS OF PHASE 1 REVIEW AND MID-TERM
    EVALUATION OF ONGOING SPSP
  • DAG Transport TWG, 26 February 2008

2
Objectives of Study
  • To analyse the achievements and possible
    shortcomings of the ongoing SPSP with a view to
    formulate a proposal for continuation, taking
    account of the lessons learnt
  • The analysis should be based on seven key areas
    of assessment
  • Determine whether the May 2005 report is still
    valid or needs to be adapted

3
Objectives of Phase 1
  • To assess the relevance, effectiveness,
    efficiency, impact and sustainability of the
    ongoing SPSP
  • Re-assess the seven key areas
  • Describe lessons learnt so far
  • Draw conclusions
  • If necessary, propose adaptations for a future
    continuation of the SPSP

4
Objectives of Phase 2
  • Based on the outcome of Phase 1, formulate a
    second SPSP for financing under EDF 10

5
Objectives of Phase 3
  • Based on the outcome of Phase 2, prepare a draft
    financing proposal

6
The Study Timetable
7
Objective of Presentation
  • To present the findings of Phase 1, especially
  • Lessons learnt so far
  • Conclusions
  • Proposed adaptations

8
The Seven Key Areas
  • Sector policy and strategy
  • Sector budgeting and its medium-term perspective
  • Sector and donor coordination
  • Institutional setting and capacity issues
  • Performance monitoring systems
  • Macroeconomic framework
  • Public financial management

9
The Seven Key Areas
  • Sector Policy and Strategy

10
1. Sector Policy and Strategy
  • Is Ethiopias sector policy and strategy coherent
    with the national poverty reduction strategy as
    enshrined in PASDEP?
  • Only partially
  • Inadequate provision of sustainable road
    infrastructure to the rural population
  • Development of strong management and technical
    capacity to manage the network is lacking at
    regional and woreda level
  • The capacity of the domestic road construction
    industry is still too low and development efforts
    weak

11
1. Sector Policy and Strategy
  • Does the policy need to be reviewed and adapted
    in the light of the National Transport Master
    Plan?
  • Yes
  • If plan adopted, will recommend a significant
    shift of resources towards woreda and community
    roads, with long-term goal of all kebeles being
    connected to the network
  • Plan also includes a 20-year programme to develop
    a cadre of rural labour-based contractors
    nationwide
  • Plan includes strengthening MWUD and allocating
    clear responsibility for this 20-year programme

12
1. Sector Policy and Strategy
  • Is the policy and strategy widely agreed by the
    sector stakeholders?
  • No
  • RSDP achievements welcomed, but Ministries of
    Health, Education and Agriculture all requesting
    roads to kebele centres as part of national
    development strategy
  • TA also thinks balance is wrong
  • TA thinks there is not enough transport-related
    education in the sector. Contractors say the
    same from their perspective
  • Coordination and consultation on safety and plans
    is not effective enough
  • Widespread ignorance of RSDP which is presented
    without sufficient prior dialogue in any
    formalised way. RSDP is not the only element of
    roads sector policy though it is often seen as
    such

13
The Policy Instruments
14
1. Sector Policy and Strategy
  • Lessons learnt
  • There needs to be a much stronger policy dialogue
    leading to a comprehensive roads sector policy
    document

15
The Seven Key Areas
  • Sector Budgeting and its Medium-Term Perspective

16
2. Sector Budgeting
  • Is the 3 years expenditure forecast of RSDP-III
    realistic and affordable?
  • No

17
2. Sector Budgeting
  • Is GOE budgeting for roads sector conducive to
    bring about improvement at regional, district and
    sub-district level regarding access to transport?
  • No
  • No mechanism to ensure that block grants are
    sufficient for the purpose and are being
    allocated sufficiently for roads at regional,
    district or sub-district level

18
2. Sector Budgeting
  • Are collected road user charges sufficient to
    maintain Ethiopia's expanding road network and to
    sustain the considerable investments in the
    sector infrastructure?
  • Seemingly not
  • For 2007/08 total requests of 1.5 billion birr
    exceed available resources of 1.2 billion birr
  • The real need is said to be greater than the
    requests
  • Projections need to be made for subsequent years

19
2. Sector Budgeting
  • Lessons learnt
  • Initial political commitment to RSDP-III is not
    proving to be financially sustainable
  • Mechanisms need to be developed for effective
    and sufficient federal support to regional and
    local levels

20
The Seven Key Areas
  • Sector and Donor Coordination

21
3. Sector and Donor Coordination
  • Is ERA effectively leading the coordination of
    the sector development partners?
  • Yes, but
  • Does ERA represent the roads sector as a whole
    and all aspects of the policy?

22
3. Sector and Donor Coordination
  • Is the coordination process formalised and
    accepted by the sector stakeholders?
  • No
  • No evidence found of a formalised and accepted
    coordination process that includes other
    Ministries, the TA, Road Fund or other
    stakeholders.

23
3. Sector and Donor Coordination
  • Are the sector donors subscribing to the concept
    of a sector-wide approach with sector budget
    support as the preferred financing modality?
  • Only partially
  • European Commission yes
  • DFID partly
  • Others no.

24
3. Sector and Donor Coordination
  • Lessons learnt
  • A more holistic leadership with a formalised and
    agreed coordination process could encourage more
    sector budget support

25
The Seven Key Areas
  • Institutional Setting and Capacity Issues

26
4. Institutional Setting and Capacity Issues
  • How do ERA and other key agencies assess their
    institutional performance from year to year?
  • ERA amount disbursed (fivefold increase in 10
    years.). (The workload has increased, and
    physical and financial targets are being met.)
    Indicators produced by consultants appear to be
    secondary. BPR is assessing performance but this
    is not an annual exercise.
  • For both construction and maintenance, monthly
    reports of progress against plan are evaluated
    internally but assessment of the quality of the
    works is at local level.
  • RF biannual meeting with road agencies to
    compare performance against plan, identify
    bottlenecks and prepare next annual plan.
    Internal assessment as to whether on track
    against plan.
  • Others MWUD has delegated most responsibilities
    to ERA oversight is by Board, not by Ministry.
    But ERAs performance has improved they are
    spending all the money.

27
4. Institutional Setting and Capacity Issues
  • Are staff development programmes of sector
    agencies effective and efficient and how is this
    measured?
  • Efforts being made throughout public sector, but
    staff turnover is high
  • There is inadequate training for contractors,
    traffic police and others

28
4. Institutional Setting and Capacity Issues
  • Are staff and resources used in an optimal way?
  • No
  • Resource planning practices by most of the
    agencies need substantial and urgent
    improvement the resource planning and
    management practices of the DMOs are the worst
  • Increased workload and staff shortages mean that
    staff are being more intensively utilised than
    before. BPR may increase efficiency and
    effectiveness
  • Question has been raised as to whether the Road
    Fund needs to spend so much time double-checking
    performance on maintenance contracts, when ERA
    has already conducted its own checks
  • Compared with RRAs and MRAs. Consultancy
    Contract for Financial and Technical Audit
    Services, Louis Berger with Afro-Consult, August
    2005

29
4. Institutional Setting and Capacity Issues
  • What are the key issues regarding the development
    of the domestic consulting and contracting
    industry and how can development partners assist?
  • Contractors are new since last 12 years and have
    short track records, low experience and not
    enough training
  • Equipment tends to be poor and the pay for scarce
    equipment operators is very high only Alemgena
    can train for whole country. Chinese now
    bringing own operators
  • Lack of finance and lack of financial and project
    management skills
  • Payment delays, design changes, contract
    documents not clear, etc. leads to claims.
    Lack of materials testing facilities
  • Lack of joint ventures which could help skills
    transfer
  • Lack of arbitration means that the only recourse
    to solve disputes is to courts
  • Most useful assistance would be to help MWUD
    prepare and implement a holistic programme for
    contractor development, including for RADA and
    equipment rental, training of skilled people

30
4. Institutional Setting and Capacity Issues
  • Lessons learnt
  • There is no overall institution responsible for
    the roads sector
  • There is a need for an anchoring ministry
  • Sector budget support must include strengthening
    MWUD.

31
The Seven Key Areas
  • Performance Monitoring Systems

32
5. Performance Monitoring Systems
  • Are the mechanisms of monitoring and performance
    assessment adequate and do they render reliable
    results?
  • Monitoring RSDP 16 indicators
  • Density. OK.
  • Traffic flow OK when number of counting stations
    consistent
  • Roughness/road condition/VOC road condition
    assessment only and apparently based on different
    3000 km each year
  • Freight and passenger tariffs OK at federal
    level
  • Fatalities/accidents per vehicle should be
    vehicle-km?
  • Maintenance budget, expenditure and km
    maintained unclear
  • Maintenance costs unclear
  • Time for contract administration difficult to
    understand no data for latest year
  • Private/total construction ratio some weird
    fluctuations, includes international
  • Labour-based/total construction ratio sharp
    fall, recording method questioned
  • Actual axle load/legal limit ratio OK, but
    overloading is not just axle load issue
  • Construction, rehabilitation and maintenance
    costs figures incomplete
  • Journey time unclear how assessed buses and
    trucks lumped together
  • Employment opportunity for local labour figures
    unclear and strange fluctuations
  • Income generation source not stated
  • Improvement in skill levels (road works) falling
    but figures not presented
  • Conclusion clear report summary, but data
    sources and figures unclear

33
5. Performance Monitoring Systems
  • Are the mechanisms of monitoring and performance
    assessment adequate and do they render reliable
    results?
  • Determining variable tranche disbursement 10
    indicators
  • Density. Based on all standards roads, but
    figures seem to be based on the classified
    network
  • Accessibility based on land area, not
    populations or kebele centres
  • Maintenance asphalt roads in good condition
    OK, but what per cent of roads are asphalt?
  • Maintenance gravel roads in good condition OK
  • Maintenance expenditure of Road Fund OK
  • Axle load control average overload of trucks
    OK for protection of network, not enough for
    safety
  • Private sector development figures include
    international contractors (75)
  • Capturing Road Fund in the budget OK
  • Institutional capacity-building based on
    schedule, not on programme
  • Road safety OK
  • Conclusion need to develop clearer policy
    objectives with related performance indicators
    and targeted data collection

34
5. Performance Monitoring Systems
  • Are the indicators well chosen and consistent to
    assess the sector achievements from year to year?
  • Four areas in particular need attention
  • Accessibility need to identify at woreda and
    kebele level
  • Condition needs more formal assessment and needs
    to include per cent of network that is paved
  • Procurement and contract administration, and time
    for payments
  • Private sector development should identify
    domestic contractors by size of contractor

35
5. Performance Monitoring Systems
  • Is the process of stakeholder consultation and
    the flow of information widely accepted as being
    sufficient and adequate for decision-making?
  • No
  • Annual reports not available in English
  • Big data gap regarding woredas and kebeles
  • Lack of overall responsibility for the
    implementation of the road sector policy
  • Consultation on policy, RSDP-III and ERA
    restructuring needs greater focus

36
5. Performance Monitoring Systems
  • Lessons learnt
  • A Roads Department is needed in the Ministry of
    Works

37
The Seven Key Areas
  • Macroeconomic Framework

38
6. Macro-Economic Framework
  • Is the present process of assessing the
    macro-economic context adequate and providing
    reliable information for decision making?
  • Yes, but
  • Although the overall macro-economic assessment
    taking into account total estimated revenues,
    loans, assistance and debt service and
    expenditure at federal and regional level appears
    to be sound,
  • the current budget process is inappropriate in
    terms of priority setting and achieving policy
    objectives. The budget is based on a line-item
    classification looking at inputs rather than at
    prioritising expenditure with the aim of
    achieving policy goals

39
6. Macro-Economic Framework (continued)
  • Programme budgeting is being introduced (pilot
    implementation is ongoing with IMF support) to
    integrate strategic planning with financial
    planning and management. A programme means a
    group of activities and projects under a single
    manager which uses resources to contribute to a
    single policy objective

40
6. Macro-Economic Framework
  • Lessons learnt
  • Programme budgeting would really be meaningful
    once we have a comprehensive programme to
    support, linked to policy and with an anchoring
    institution for implementation

41
The Seven Key Areas
  • Public Financial Management

42
7. Public Financial Management
  • Are the present methods of assessing budget
    credibility, comprehensiveness and unification
    adequate for decision making?
  • Not yet
  • Large variations between original budget and
    expenditure outturns for ERA in particular in
    2005/06 (20 underspending) and also 2006/07 (6
    underspending)
  • Budget does not include Road Fund
  • Medium-term budget does not yet fully unify
    recurrent and capital expenditures (although this
    will be rectified under programme budgeting)

43
7. Public Financial Management
  • Are procurement procedures used by ERA and other
    sector agencies transparent and according to best
    international practices? Do they provide value
    for money?
  • Yes and no
  • So long as planning, control and design
    procedures are inadequate, procurement procedures
    cannot provide value for money

44
7. Public Financial Management
  • Do sector agencies provide timely audited
    accounts and reports that confirm good financial
    management?
  • MOFED audit report 2005/06 (only in Amharic)
    reveals problems, audit not finalised
  • ERA 2005/06 audit report reveals problems,
    especially at District level
  • RF 2005/06 audit report is unqualified (i.e.
    satisfactory)

45
7. Public Financial Management
  • Lessons learnt
  • Budget reform is in its initial stages and needs
    to be continued
  • Better planning control and project preparation
    needed
  • Financial management needs to be strengthened
    especially at the level of MOFED, which is the
    receiver and disburser of sector budget support

46
Conclusions and Suggested Adaptations of SPSP
  • Conclusion 1
  • The sector policy needs to be modified to include
    the development of a comprehensive sector policy
    that includes local roads and contractor issues,
    with clear overall responsibility anchored in
    MWUD, and a realistic match between plans and
    resources
  • Suggested adaptation to SPSP
  • A target date should be set for agreement on
    such a holistic policy, with anchorage in MWUD
    implemented by the end of SPSP 2

47
Conclusions and Suggested Adaptations of SPSP
  • Conclusion 2
  • It is essential to strengthen MWUD with a Roads
    Department to take this responsibility (including
    ERA, Road Fund) and establish linkages with RRAs,
    CRs (RADA?), Transport Authority, Traffic Police
    and domestic construction industry.
  • Suggested adaptation to SPSP
  • Such a strengthened MWUD should be included in
    the supported policy

48
Conclusions and Suggested Adaptations of SPSP
  • Conclusion 3
  • Budget reforms should continue and credible,
    unified and comprehensive linkages with policy
    and plans should be developed
  • Suggested adaptation to SPSP
  • There should be progress towards a holistic and
    realistic programme budget for the roads sector,
    anchored in MWUD and in the agreed policy

49
Conclusions and Suggested Adaptations of SPSP
  • Conclusion 4
  • MWUD must ensure formalised consultation with
    sector stakeholders
  • Suggested adaptation to SPSP
  • Consultation processes and events can be
    included in the performance indicators for
    variable tranche disbursement

50
Conclusions and Suggested Adaptations of SPSP
  • Conclusion 5
  • For ERA reorganisation, consultation with donors
    is essential. There is also a need to review
    designs and specifications for road works
  • Suggested adaptation to SPSP
  • None as such, but should ERA reorganisation be
    delayed until the holistic policy is in place and
    the future MWUD/RD role defined?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com