Title: Essentials of Economics
1Essentials of Economics
2Money and Interest
- We have seen that extending the Keynesian
income-expenditure model to take account of the
impact and interrelationship of money and
interest rates helps us to understand the impact
of the price level on aggregate demand. - We will find that it also helps with policy.
3Aggregate Demand and the Price Level
4Some Details
- an increase in the price level reduces the
purchasing power of the fixed money supply. - with less purchasing power, people are less able
to reduce their shoe leather costs of carrying
out business transactions, and they demand more
money for transactions. - investors need more money to finance the same
projects as before, increasing the demand for
loans. - both of these influences tend to increase the
interest rate.
5Monetary Policy
- Monetary Policy
- Changes in central bank policy or in bank
reserves, designed to influence the interest rate
and thus investment, production and employment,
are called monetary policy. - Monetary policy will have its influence (mainly)
through the effect on interest rates and
therefore on investment (details to follow).
6Monetary Policy
Interest is at the center of monetary policy.
Suppose that the Federal Reserve System wants to
stimulate more aggregate demand. They buy bonds,
increasing the money supply. There is more
purchasing power at every price level, so the
aggregate demand curve shifts to the right. If
the Fed wants to reduce the aggregate demand, to
offset inflation by holding the price level down,
they withdraw money from the economy (selling
bonds) and that would lead to a shift to the left
in the AD curve.
7The Marginal Efficiency of Investment
- Marginal Efficiency of Investment
- The Marginal Efficiency of Investment is a
relationship between interest and investment that
tells us, for each respective interest rate, the
amount of investment that can be undertaken
profitably, ceteris paribus. - Abbreviation MEI
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10What Determines Interest?
11Policy
- Suppose that the rate of interest is Rb, the
money supply is Mb, and the Federal Reserve
authorities want to raise the interest rate to
Ra. They would do this by cutting the money
supply back to Ma. - Suppose that the rate of interest is Ra, the
money supply is Ma, and the Federal Reserve
authorities want to reduce the interest rate to
Rb. They would do this by increasing the money
supply to Mb. - These two examples illustrate "interest rate
targeting."
12Reducing the Money Supply
Cut the money supply back to Ma. At the going
interest rate of Rb, people would want to hold
more money than that, so they would sell some of
their bonds to get more money. But with no more
money to be gotten, their competition to sell
bonds would just push the price of bonds down and
the interest rate up. Thus the interest rate
would rise to Ra, and at that rate, people would
be satisfied to hold the reduced supply of money
and would not compete to sell any more bonds at
even lower prices.
13Increasing the Money Supply
Increase the money supply to Mb. At the going
interest rate of Ra, people would want to hold
more bonds, so they would compete to buy bonds
with their increased money balances. But with no
more bonds to be gotten, their competition to buy
bonds would just push the price of bonds up and
the interest rate down. Thus the interest rate
would drop to Rb, and at that rate, people would
be satisfied to hold the increased supply of
money and would not compete to sell any more
bonds at even higher prices.
14A Complication The Liquidity Trap
In this figure there is a liquidity trap at Rt
-- the FED cannot force the interest rate below
Rt. In May, the FED estimated that the interest
rate target for an optimal monetary policy would
be -5 -- and it is certain that the interest
rate in this sense cannot go below zero!
15Recently,
Because of the credit crisis last fall, it seems
almost certain that we had a liquidity trap at
a positive interest rate at that time. In any
case, there is always a liquidity trap at zero
interest.
16From the General Theory
- If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with
banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in
disused coalmines which are then filled up to the
surface with town rubbish, and leave it to
private enterprise on well-tried principles of
laissez-faire to dig the notes up again (the
right to do so being obtained, of course, by
tendering for leases of the note-bearing
territory), there need be no more unemployment
17Inflation
- This quote from Keynes will give many economists
the heebie-jeebies. - In many historical cases, such wholesale creation
of money has led to inflation and hyperinflation.
- On the contrary, many economists would argue that
the first aim of monetary policy should be the
prevention of inflation.
18Causes
- When demand increases and this results in
inflation, we describe it as demand pull
inflation. - When cost increases and this causes supply to
decrease in turn, and this results in inflation,
we describe it as cost push inflation. - They may reinforce one another.
19Why does it matter how many zeros we have on our
bills?
- Inflation
- Creates uncertainty, in that people do not know
what the money they earn today will buy tomorrow. - Uncertainty, in turn, discourages productive
activity, saving and investing. - Reduces the competitiveness of the country in
international trade.
20Inflation as a Problem, Contd.
- Inflation is a hidden tax on "nominal balances."
That is, people who hold bonds and bank accounts
in dollars lose the value of those accounts when
the price level rises, just as if their money had
been taxed away. - The inflation tax is capricious -- some lose by
it and some do not without any good economic
reason. - As the purchasing power of the monetary unit
becomes less predictable, people resort to other
means to carry out their business, means which
use up resources and are inefficient.
21Hyperinflation
The term "hyperinflation" refers to a very rapid,
very large increase in the price level. In
Germany, for example, between January 1922 and
November 1923 (less than two years!) the average
price level increased about 20 billion times.
22German Hyperinflation 1
23German Hyperinflation 2
24German Hyperinflation 3
25Interim Summary
- Clearly, inflation can be a problem.
Hyperinflation means no less than the breakdown
of the economic system. - Less drastic inflations create less drastic
problems. The problems arise largely from the
uncertainty and distortions of resource use that
are associated with inflation.
26Interest Rate Targeting
- Most modern economists would argue that the
primary job of monetary policy is to prevent
inflation. (That view is less popular since the
fall of 2008.) - The key method of modern monetary policy is
interest rate targeting. - The interest rate that matters is the real
interest rate -- adjusted for inflation, again.
27Interest Rates
28But!
- We should adjust interest rates for inflation.
- Because inflation reduces the purchasing power of
the lenders principle amount, in proportion to
the inflation rate, and - Because inflation reduces the repayment burden on
the borrower, in purchasing power terms, just in
the same proportion.
29Inflation
30Adjusting for Inflation
We see that the rate of inflation (in terms of
the consumer price index) has varied widely over
the period. To adjust for inflation, we compute
the real interest rate by subtracting the rate
of inflation from the rate of interest.
31Real Interest
32Fiscal Policy
An increase in government spending, ceteris
paribus, will shift aggregate demand to the
right, and a decrease in government spending will
shift it to the left. Changes in taxes would also
influence aggregate demand, according to the
Keynesian approach, although with somewhat less
impact, dollar for dollar. An increase in taxes
would shift the aggregate demand curve to the
left, and a tax cut would shift it to the right.
33Government Purchases
Replace Y CI with Y CIG G is government
purchases of goods and services. We will treat it
as a component of autonomous spending.
34Equilibrium with Government Purchases
35Fiscal Policy a First Approach
What we have just seen is that a change in
government purchases of goods and services can
influence the equilibrium income in the model
economy. An increase in income would mean
(ceteris paribus) that more people would be
employed to produce the income. So it could make
sense for the government to spend more money in
order to stimulate production. Public works
projects designed to increase employment would be
an example of "fiscal policy."
36What about Taxes?
We will have to distinguish between income before
and after taxes. Disposable Income Disposable
income is income net of taxes, and is the income
the individual is able to divide between
consumption and spending. C a b(Yd) a
b(Y-T)
37Equilibrium with Taxes
38Multipliers 1
With government spending but no taxes,
equilibrium income can be expressed by the
multiplier formula
where a is the part of consumption that does not
depend on income, the autonomous consumption,
and b is the marginal propensity to consume,
i.e. the additional consumption consequent on 1
more income.
39Multipliers 2
With taxes, the multiplier formula is more
complex
where G is government spending and T is taxation.
Notice that a 1 increase in G and T, a balanced
budget expansion, will not exactly offset. On
net, taxes have less impact than spending.
40Two Sides of Fiscal Policy
- Recessionary Gaps
- A recessionary gap exists when production is less
than full employment production. It might also be
called a "contractionary" gap, since production
is "contracted" below full employment. - Inflationary Gaps.
- An inflationary gap exists when equilibrium
income is greater than full employment income. An
inflationary gap could also be called an
expansionary gap.
41Approaches to Fiscal Policy
- Discretionary fiscal policy
- This means the government changes taxes and
spending to respond to current events - However, lags in the legislative process make
this a questionable Rx in most circumstances - Automatic stabilizers
- Progressive taxes, unemployment insurance and
similar government programs are automatically
stimulating in recessions.
42Crowding Out
- Another criticism of fiscal policy is that
government spending may crowd out other forms
of spending, especially investment. - This would reduce the effectiveness of fiscal
policy - Especially as we approach full employment.
43A Guide to Fiscal Policy 1
- Recall the paradox of thrift. The idea is that
- At full employment people would want to save more
than can be invested. - Cutting back on their spending, they reduce
aggregate demand. - This leads to a decline in employment and income,
- which reduces planned spending to the level of
investment. - A fiscal policy to limit the decline in
production and employment substitutes government
spending, usually at a deficit, for the
private-sector spending that has declined.
44A Guide to Fiscal Policy 2
- This would function through the multiplier.
- Recall, a dollar of government spending has a
multiplier of 1/(1-MPC) - A tax or tax cut has a negative multiplier of
MPC/(1-MPC) - All of this assumes that the increase in
government debt can take place without a
consequent rise in the interest rate. Interest
rates might rise for two reasons - People might fear default or inflation because of
the increase in debt. - Government debt might have to compete with, and
crowd out, private debt.
45A Guide to Fiscal Policy 3
- In late 2008 and early 2009, there was
controversy about which forms of fiscal policy
would have the greatest immediate effect. - Conservatives tended to support tax cuts.
- We have seen that they have a smaller multiplier,
and have little or no impact at all unless they
are permanent. (This follows from the ideas of
Friedman and Modigliani and is illustrated by
Johnson and G. W. Bush tax cuts). - However, conservatives argued that the impact
would be immediate, while it would take time for
public spending projects to get going.
46A Guide to Fiscal Policy 4
- While highway work might be needed (some
conservatives argued) a recession would be the
wrong period because we cant afford it. - Liberals tended to support public works.
- The larger multiplier was one reason.
- It was argued that the impact on jobs would be
more certain -- we never really know whether a
tax cut will be spent or not, and if not, no
jobs. - Recession would be the best time, since private
investment would not be crowded out.
47A Guide to Fiscal Policy 5
- This point was not made in the discussion, but
the expectation that public works would continue
to create jobs over some period in the future
would improve peoples perception of their future
permanent or life cycle income and thus
stimulate their consumption today. - Once again, either position requires us to assume
that there is no danger either of default or
inflationary finance to repay the public debt --
that we can grow our way out of it. This is no
less true of tax cuts than of public works.
48Fiscal Policy Summary
- Government spending is incorporated in the
income-expenditure model as an additional
component of autonomous spending. - This is the basis for analysis of fiscal policy.
- With taxes in the picture, we relate consumption
to disposable income. - For that reason, tax changes are somewhat less
effective (all in all) than spending changes.