Title: Worklife career mobility: changing gender differences
1Work-life career mobility changing gender
differences?
Erzsébet Bukodi and Shirley Dex GeNet Final
Conference Cambridge, 26-27 March 2009
2Research questions
- Are there gender differences in the pattern of
work-life occupational mobility? - Are womens and mens occupational trajectories
(in terms of earnings and social status)
converging or diverging over time, across
cohorts?
3Overview
- Policy and legislative context
- Data and labour market context
- Two measures for occupational standing
- Occupational attainment over the career
- A typology of occupational histories
- The role of education and entry position in
work-life occupational mobility
4Some relevant background
- 1970s was the decade of major legislative and
policy change on equality - Equal Pay legislation
- 1975 Anti sex discrimination legislation
- Statutory maternity leave
- Decade for family policy changes from 1997
onwards - National Child Care Strategy Sure Start
Programme Working Families Tax Credit Part-time
work directive Family leave directive parental
leave Paid paternity leave enhanced and wider
eligibility maternity leave, Min wage.
5Data Three British Birth Cohort Studies
- MRC National Survey of Health and Development
- all children born in England, Wales and Scotland
in one week in 1946. - follow up data collections took place twice from
ages 1 to 4, 8 times between ages 5-15, 7 times
between ages 16-31 and 3 times between ages 32-53 - The National Child Development Study
- Census of babies born in a certain week of 1958
in GB - 7 main interview waves up to 2004 (age 46)
- The British Cohort Study
- Census of babies born in a certain week of 1970
in GB - 6 sweeps up to 2004 (age 34)
- In all surveys
- Retrospective occupational histories
6Data sample size
7Two measures for occupational standing
- Earnings and social status can be seen as major
rewards obtained via occupation - Occupational earnings scale An updated and
extended version of the Nickell scale - the average hourly earnings of all employees, men
and women, working full-time - it provides a score for each of the 77 SOC90
minor occupational groups - Occupational status scale Chan Goldthorpe
scale - extracting principal dimension from data on
social interaction among members of occupations
(close friendship) - provides scores for 31 occupational categories
(either SOC90 minor groups or combinations of
them)
8Earnings and status hierarchies different ones
- The occupational earnings and occupational status
hierarchies, although weakly correlated, are
still clearly different scales. - Eg. when cross-classifying all jobs ever held by
NCDS men aged 16-46, - just over 25 of all men were on the main
diagonal - over a half of men are in occupations that yield
higher earnings relative to their status - Under 25 of men in occupations with lower
earnings than their status.
9Labour market conditions at entry
10Labour market conditions over cohorts
life-courses
Cohort 1946 aged 22-34
Cohort 1970 aged 22-34
Cohort 1958 aged 22-34
11Economic conditions Growth in GDP
Cohort 1946 LM entry
Cohort 1958 LM entry
Cohort 1970 LM entry
Cohort 1946 aged 22-34
Cohort 1958 aged 22-34
Cohort 1970 aged 22-34
12Occupational earnings attainment over age
MEN
WOMEN
13Occupational status attainment over age
MEN
WOMEN
14A typology of occupational histories, ages 16 to
34
15Work-life occupational earnings mobility
16Work-life occupational status mobility
17Two scales differing patterns of gender
differences
18The role of education and career entry
- Multinomial regression
- Dependent variable the 5-fold typology
- Covariates education, first occupational status,
only full-time work over the career, fathers
class managerial professional - Separately for cohorts and genders
- Separately for the earnings and the status scale
- Calculating predicted proportions of career types
- for differing levels of education
- for differing levels of first occupation
19The role of education
- 1946 cohort Remarkably stable career for
degree-holders (low rates of upward/downward
mobility) - 1958 cohort very unstable career regardless of
level of qualification (especially for women with
part-time experience and men) - For the less well educated, higher rates of
downward mobility, especially in the 1958 cohort - For the tertiary educated, higher rates of upward
mobility, but - for vast majority of 1958 cohort, upward moves
are followed by downward moves - much higher probability in 1970 cohort of a
steadily upward career (especially for men) - Generally, stronger effects of education for
women in all cohorts
20The first occupations - striking gender
differences
- Earnings hierarchy
- far greater immobility at the bottom of the
hierarchy for women than men, especially for
women with some part-time experience - womens chances of mobility out of the bottom
level of the earnings hierarchy are even getting
worse - However, in case of the status scale
- womens chances for mobility out of the bottom
are much higher than mens, even if they
experienced part-time work over their careers - Women and men, who start out at the top, tend to
have relatively stable careers but this is much
more apparent in the 1946 and the 1970 than in
the 1958 cohort
21Conclusions
- Occupational status
- women are more likely than men to move upwards
- bad effects of part-time work are deteriorating
over time - Occupational earnings
- women are less likely than men to move upwards,
and are more likely to move downwards - womens chances of moving out of the bottom are
getting worse - on average, declining gender differences in this
respect - Gender differences in career mobility depending
on how we measure them
22Conclusions
- The 1958 cohort very unstable occupational
careers, especially for men, at all levels of
qualification, and regardless of the occupational
levels at career entry - the effects of economic circumstances under which
they developed their early careers