The Future of Workplace Partnership - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

The Future of Workplace Partnership

Description:

Department of Management and Research Centre for Innovation ... Between corporatism and voluntarism. Pros and Cons. Productivity, stability, jobs, real wages ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: LRC64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Future of Workplace Partnership


1
(No Transcript)
2
The Future of Workplace Partnership
  • Dr Tony Royle
  • Department of Management and Research Centre for
    Innovation and Structural Change, JE Cairnes
    Graduate School of Business and Public Policy,
    National University of Ireland Galway
  • E-Mail tony.royle_at_nuigalway.ie

3
Irish social partnership
  • Between corporatism and voluntarism
  • Pros and Cons
  • Productivity, stability, jobs, real wages
  • Productivity falling, falling social spend, wage
    inequality, wage share of GDP falling, continuing
    reliance on third party resolution, failure of
    workplace partnership?
  • Productivity as catch up
  • Long hours
  • NCPP National workplace strategy

4
  • Low productivity may be less a reflection of
    physical or technical shortcomings than a failure
    to find a social model that brings out the best
    in average employeesbehavioural economics
    suggests a direct link between fairness and
    productivity. People give their best when they
    feel justly treated relative to others.
  • Michael Prowse Centre for Economic Performance
    (LSE)

5
GDP per hour worked Source OECD
6
Growth in GDP per capita (Source OECD)
7
LRC conciliation services activity
8
Annual average hours worked 2005
9
Political economy of workplace partnership
  • Continental statutory worker representation
  • Collective and indirect representation
  • Strategic and operational issues
  • Oversee substantive and procedural rights
  • Mandatory sanctions for non-compliance
  • Integrative bargaining
  • Organization driven
  • Decentralised, individual, emphasis on direct
  • Operational
  • Day to day business problem solving
  • Managerial prerogative dominates
  • Performance driven

10
The Irish Hybrid
  • Blurring the lines between organization-led and
    statutory
  • System cannot be imposed
  • Employees as stakeholders
  • Partnership committees
  • Compatible with organization-led approaches
  • Potentially contains strategic and integrative
    approach
  • Resources provided by IBEC, ICTU, NCPP

11
Challenges facing workplace partnership
  • Usually found where theres a history of conflict
  • Many partnerships lack innovative elements
  • Focus on operational matters not strategy
  • Projects not often extended to whole workforce
  • Problem of buy-in
  • Management fear loss of authority
  • Unions fear weakening collective bargaining
  • Them and us culture still pervasive

12
Failure of Irish Workplace Partnership?(2003
NCPP/ESRI survey on workplace partnership)
  • Unionised firms
  • 17 have formal policies to avoid compulsory
    lay-offs
  • 20 involved in profit sharing/gain-sharing
  • 50 get paid training
  • 30 of unionised companies have direct
    involvement
  • Non-unionised firms
  • Only 5 report 3 of the above practices
  • Conclusion
  • 1st generation agreements dominate
  • Notable failures (Aer Rianta and RTE)
  • High road optimism unfounded.
  • Growing latitude for employers to ignore WP.

13
EU Information and Consultation Directive
  • A boost for Irish workplace partnership?
  • Finally in force in 2006
  • 50 firms by 2008
  • Employees must opt in (in writing)
  • 10 threshold (min 15, max 100)
  • Pre-existing agreements
  • No automatic rights for unions
  • No specified role for experts
  • Disputes to be d/w by the Labour Court
  • Role of US Chambers of Commerce

14
Research objectives
  • What impact does the Act have on the take- up and
    processes of workplace partnership?
  • Does the Act help to introduce innovation and
    boost productivity?
  • Is the Act an effective mechanism for employee
    voice?
  • Does the Act help to reduce and resolve disputes?

15
Research methods
  • Emphasis on qualitative case studies
  • Firms with 50 or more employees
  • Manufacturing
  • Low paid service sectors
  • Public sector
  • Unionized and non-unionized
  • Would complement ongoing and other research
    proposals on alternative dispute resolution

16
The potential for future research
  • Learning from our competitors
  • International and comparative research
  • Fast-moving and dynamic area in the EU
  • Germany works councils and productivity
  • Sweden worker directors boosting competitiveness
  • Finland strengthening cooperation Act
  • Belgium more power for labour inspectors
  • Slovak Rep strengthening labour law
  • Related themes on flexicurity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com