Performance of Various Operational and Experimental Numerical Forecasts for the March 2003 Colorado - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Performance of Various Operational and Experimental Numerical Forecasts for the March 2003 Colorado

Description:

Performance of Various Operational and Experimental Numerical ... 500 mb height, vorticity and wind. Surface pressure, thickness, and precip. January 14, 2004 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: lapsFs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Performance of Various Operational and Experimental Numerical Forecasts for the March 2003 Colorado


1
Performance of Various Operational and
Experimental Numerical Forecasts for the March
2003 Colorado SnowstormEd Szoke Brent Shaw
and Paul SchultzNOAA Forecast Systems
LabBoulder, Coloradoedward.j.szoke_at_noaa.govDave
Barjenbruch Boulder WFOIn collaboration
with the Cooperative Institute for Research in
the Atmosphere (CIRA), Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, Colorado
2
Its not 40, but still my biggest storm (25.2)

3
Its not 40, but still my biggest storm (25.2)

4
Impressive snow in the foothills...87.5 at 9000
feet in Coal Creek Canyon southwest of Boulder

5
The snow was quite heavy with lots of broken
limbs and roof collapses

6
Its not 40, but still my biggest storm (25.2)

7

8
Ski area snow reports

Loveland Ski Area...at Continental Divide on I70
9
I70.closed for over 2 days

10
The widespread snowfall boosted mountain snowpack
to normal

11
  • There are MANY interesting aspects of this
    massive storm
  • Longer range (8-15 days) model forecasts
    indicated potential


240 h forecast from the GFS run initialized at
0000 UTC on 8 March and valid 0000 UTC on 18
March
12
  • Longer range (8-15 days) model forecasts
    indicating potential
  • Drifting to poorer forecasts in the mid-range

GFS 132 h forecast initialized 0000 UTC on 13
March and valid 1200 UTC on 18 March. This
forecast produces a major storm in the Midwest
but very little snow for the Front Range of
Colorado.

13
Use of GFS and Canadian ensemble forecasts as
well as multi-model ensembles to make a better
forecast. GFS ensemble shown below for same 132h
forecast.

14
Then quite good NWP forecasts in the lt 2-3 day
range. This Eta 84h forecast issued 1200 UTC
Fri/14 Mar and valid 0000 UTC Tue/18 Mar is quite
good.

500 mb height, vorticity and wind
Surface pressure, thickness, and precip
15
Outline
  • Then quite good NWP forecasts in the lt 2-3 day
    range
  • Including impressive 5 ft. model forecasts for
    the foothills
  • Excellent 1-1.5 day NWS snowfall forecasts for
    historic event
  • Included forecast of 3-8 ft. of snow for the
    foothills
  • Smaller scale detailsincluding the Lyons snow
    hole


16
Smaller scale detailsincluding the Lyons snow
hole

17
Outline...continued
  • A significant forecasting aspect of the storm
    was rain versus snow at the lower elevations
    where most of the population is located
  • Although a Winter Storm Warning was issued for
    the Front Range cities as early as Sunday (valid
    from Monday night into Wednesday)...there were
    conflicting signals as late as Monday evening
    about when (if?) the rain would change to snow!
  • The operational models (Eta, RUC) were
    indicating that temperatures would be too warm
    for snow perhaps until late Tuesday
  • However, it was noted that actual surface
    temperatures were colder then forecast or even
    analyzed by the models (at 00z/18 Mar)
  • The focus of the rest of this talk will be on
    this issue and examining the 0000 UTC/18 March
    analyses and forecasts


18
But first...a quick overview of the storm. 500
mb analysis at 0000 UTC/18 Mar

19
500 mb analysis for 1200 UTC on Tue/18 March

20
500 mb analysis for 0000 UTC on Wed/19 March

21
Focus on the 0000 UTC/18 March time period
  • Critical forecast issue was when the rain would
    change to snow.
  • First a look at some observations


22
1800 UTC/17 March IR image and surface
observations
Most of the precipitation is north of CO with a
surface low taking shape over se CO.

23
1800 UTC/17 March radar and surface observations
Mild conditions along the Front Range with some
light rain. Quite warm over eastern CO. Main
precip area is in WY with cooling conditions
there.

24
2100 UTC/17 March radar and surface observations
Mi

25
0000 UTC/18 March radar and surface observations
Mild conditions along the Front Range with some
light rain. Quite warm over eastern CO. Main
precip area is in WY with cooling conditions
there.

26
0600 UTC/18 March radar and surface observations
Still raining along most of the Front Range but
barrier jet that had been forming to the north
producing strong northerly flow down the Front
Range and advecting colder air southward from se
WY.

27
1200 UTC/18 March radar and surface observations
Precipitation has changed to snow with several
inches of accumulation in many areas along the
Front Range.

28
1800 UTC/17 March radar and surface observations
Mild conditions along the Front Range with some
light rain. Quite warm over eastern CO. Main
precip area is in WY with cooling conditions
there.

29
Composite radar with obs at 21z 17 Mar
Convection becoming widespread on the Plains
30
Eta cross-section of RH (image), wind, theta, T,
18h forecast valid 06z 18 Mar
Still has the nly winds along the Front
Range. Interesting reverse flow w of the
Dividedoes this effectively raise the mtn height
and coupled with the very moist and deep ely flow
help yield the S west of the Divide?
31
Comparison of radar and obs at 00z 18 Mar with
Eta forecast
32
Closeup reveals the wind is captured well but
temps too warm
33
Similar problem with the 6h forecast from the 18
UTC Eta
34
Closeup of 18z run.
35
Eta analysis of surface T and wind with radar for
00z 18 Mar
Even the analysis misses the colder temps near
the Front Range.
36
Closeup of the 00z analysis of the Eta run
37
00z/18 Mar Eta 6h forecast of surface T, wind and
pcpn with radar for 06z 18 Mar
The warmer temps near the Front Range in the
analysis carry over through 6h.
38
Closeup.
39
00z/18 Mar LAPS analysis of surface T and wind
with radar for 00z 18 Mar
The LAPS analysis did do a good job, so in theory
a fine scale model initialized with this analysis
should do better.
40
Closeup of the 00z/18 Mar LAPS analysis
41
Composite radar with obs at 12z 18 Mar
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com