Failure to Comply: The Disconnect Between Design and Implementation in HRAs WeCARE Program A Researc - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Failure to Comply: The Disconnect Between Design and Implementation in HRAs WeCARE Program A Researc

Description:

What WeCARE Is Supposed To Do: The Comprehensive Assessment. Why Pay ... Long waits. Short ... create a mandatory 1 month wait period before a case is ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: cvhMay
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Failure to Comply: The Disconnect Between Design and Implementation in HRAs WeCARE Program A Researc


1
Failure to Comply The Disconnect Between
Design and Implementation in HRAs WeCARE
ProgramA Research Project By Community Voices
Heard
2
Presentation Format
  • WeCARE Program Overview
  • Research Design
  • Research Findings
  • WeCARE Client Testimonies
  • Recommendations

3
  • WeCARE
  • Program Overview

4
(No Transcript)
5
What is WeCARE?
  • Wellness, Comprehensive Assessment,
  • Rehabilitation and Employment
  • HRA program to help PA recipients
  • with potential barriers to employment
  • to attain their highest levels
  • of health and self-sufficiency.
  • Two primary contracting organizations
  • FEGS and Arbor E T

6
What Is WeCARE Supposed to Do?
  • Individualized and Inclusive Approach
  • Comprehensive Assessment
  • Specialized Services

7
What WeCARE Is Supposed To Do The Comprehensive
Assessment
8
Why Pay Attention to WeCARE
  • High Cost 201,465,000 allocation
  • over 3 years
  • Large Population 55.7 of the caseload is
    partially or completely
  • unable to work
  • Hard to Reach Many with multiple and
    complex barriers to employment

9
  • Research Design

10
Data Source Categories
  • HRA Documents and Meetings
  • Policy Directives, Contracts, Vendor Guidelines,
    Testimony
  • Client Conversations
  • Outreach workers held 7-10 minute conversations
    with 727 clients at 10 WeCARE sites
  • Focus Groups
  • Seven 2.5 hour sessions, 40 participants
  • Client Interviews
  • 7 in-depth interviews conducted

11
  • Research
  • Findings

12
Overall Finding
  • Good Program Design
  • Good Practice

13
Design and Implementation Divide
  • Assessments
  • Escalating Outreach
  • Federal Disability Benefits
  • Job Search/ Job Placement
  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation

14
Finding Assessments
  • Design Vs
  • Comprehensive
  • Individualized
  • Practice
  • Poor Quality
  • Low Completion Rate

15
Incomplete Assessments
  • 19 percent of
  • those referred for a WeCARE Assessment did not
    complete it

16
Poor Assessment Quality
  • Long waits
  • Short visits with Doctors
  • Recommendations and Documents from Personal
    Doctors are Ignored

17
WeCARE Participant Testimony
  • Judith Schraemli

18
Finding Escalating Outreach
  • Program Design Vs
  • Help clients meet
  • requirements
  • Letters, phone calls, contact with family, home
    visits
  • No sanctions until all
  • outreach has failed
  • Practice
  • No outreach
  • Limited Communication
  • Lots of sanctions and case closures

19
No Escalating Outreach
20
Finding Federal Disability Benefits
  • Program Design Vs
  • Vendors get to help
  • clients obtain federal
  • benefits (SSI/ SSDI)
  • Focus on trying to shift cost from NY City and
    State to Feds
  • Practice
  • Clients unaware of assistance
  • Low success rates
  • Many eligible clients
  • not applying

21
WeCARE Client Testimony
  • Terrance McSween

22
Finding Job Search/ Job Placement Services
  • Program Design Vs
  • Specialized Work Experience
  • Program sites
  • Individual Plan for Employment based on work
    experience and career goals
  • Practice
  • One-size fits all
  • WEP not specialized
  • Low employment placement rate

23
Job Search/ Job Preparation

24
Job Placement
  • Only 5.4 of those who are
    employable with limitations obtained employment

25
Finding Program Monitoring
  • Program Design Vs
  • Outside organization to conduct quarterly
    evaluation
  • Organization should be independent of HRA
  • Ensure quality, effectiveness and integrity of
    Services
  • Practice
  • Only 1 evaluation to date
  • Only medical facilities evaluated
  • No measures of effectiveness

26
  • Recommendations

27
Assessments
  • HRA Should
  • Create hotline for questions
  • about assessment process
  • Allow clients to see personal
  • doctors for assessment

28
Escalating Outreach
  • HRA Should
  • create a mandatory 1 month wait period before a
    case is sanctioned or closed.
  • Create WeCARE liaison at Job Centers to oversee
    outreach

29
Federal Disability Benefits
  • HRA and WeCARE Vendors Should
  • Subcontract the provision of federal disability
    services to an organization with expertise
  • Align WeCARE assessment with eligibility criteria
    for Federal Disability Benefits

30
Job Preparation
  • End unpaid Work Experience Program (WEP)
  • Replace WEP with paid supportive work
    programs linked to individuals interest and
    experience

31
Monitoring and Transparency
  • HRA Should
  • Establish a WeCARE participant advisory board
  • Hire independent organization to conduct
    evaluation of ALL WeCARE services and program
    components
  • Post quarterly monitoring reports and all
    Vendor statistics on HRA website

32
Failure to Comply
The Disconnect Between Design and
Implementation in HRA's WeCARE Program
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com