Writing a Critical Literature Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Writing a Critical Literature Review

Description:

Demonstrates the ability to identify relevant literature and use it appropriately. ... Bodill, 2003) and age (Hicks & Tite, 1998; Waterman & Foss-Goodman,1984) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:901
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: gty9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Writing a Critical Literature Review


1
Writing a Critical Literature Review
  • Graham Tyson
  • Sub-Dean
  • Graduate Studies
  • Faculty of Arts

2
Introduction
  • web resources
  • Writing a literature review
  • CSU Resource
  • Mcleod, S., McAllister, L. The literature
    review for students and supervisors. CD
  • There is no single correct way of writing a
    literature review

3
What is a Literature Review
  • What it is NOT
  • A summary of the literature!
  • What it IS
  • An argument justifying the study

4
  • Writing a convincing argument
  • Demonstrates the ability to identify relevant
    literature and use it appropriately.
  • Shows an understanding of the issues in the area
    of research.
  • Demonstrates an ability to critically assess the
    literature.
  • Indicates that there is a gap in the literature
    that needs filling.

5
Stages in writing the argument
  • Identify the research question
  • Searching the literature
  • Sources
  • NOT Wikipedia or Introductory textbooks.
  • Read original sources
  • Be systematic
  • Dates

6
Stages in writing the argument cont.
  • Read critically
  • Questions to ask when reading
  • Dena Bain Taylor, University of Toronto, 2007
    http//www.ceu.hu/writing/lit_review.pdf

7
Structuring the argument
  • Funnel (inverted pyramid) approach
  • Appropriate for focus
  • Inverted funnel (pyramid) approach
  • Appropriate for depth
  • Pagoda approach

8
Writing the argument
  • Put yourself in the examiners shoes
  • Organise the material conceptually
  • The amount of responsibility assigned to the
    victim is influenced by factors such as the
    behaviour of the victim, e.g. encouraging,
    resisting or passive (Broussard Wagner, 1988
    Ford, Schindler, Medway, 2001) credibility
    (Hicks Tite, 1998), methodology used (Collings
    Bodill, 2003) and age (Hicks Tite, 1998
    Waterman Foss-Goodman,1984).

9
Writing the argument cont.
  • Relevance
  • Emphasise relevance
  • Discard irrelevant material

10
Writing the argument cont.
  • Use plain English
  • Short sentences
  • Link material transitional words

11
Transitional words
  • Pronouns - this, that, these
  • referent
  • Time links - then, next
  • Cause (effect links) - therefore, consequently
  • Additional links in addition, furthermore
  • Contrast links - conversely, nevertheless,
    however.
  • APA Publication Manual 5th ed.

12
Writing the argument cont.
  • Use plain English
  • Short sentences
  • Link material transitional words
  • Use the active voice
  • The questionnaire was filled in by the
    participants (passive)
  • the participants filled in the questionnaire.
    (active)
  • Avoid jargon

13
Writing the argument cont.
  • Learn when to stop.

14
  • The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com