Title: Modelling the Entire Great Lakes and the Ottawa River Watershed
1Modelling the Entire Great Lakes and the Ottawa
River Watershed
Nick Kouwen Department of Civil
Engineering University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
,Canada
http//www.watflood.ca
2With a large amount of help from Environment
Canada Alain Pietroniro (Watershed setup) Pierre
Pellerin (Synoptic NWM data) Champa Neal (Flow
data)
3Geography Lesson
Superior
St. Marys R.
Ottawa R.
GB
Michigan
Huron
St. Lawrence R.
Ontario
St. Clair R.
Niagara R.
Detroit R.
Erie
4WATFLOOD Features
- Primary application is flood forecasting and
flood studies - Long time series for climate studies and
frequency analysis - Ability to model regions from a few km2 to
Millions of km2 - Automated watershed setup (ENSIM, MAPMAKER,
TOPAZ) - Optimal use of gridded data
- eg. Land cover, DEMs, NWP model output, Radar
data - Universally applicable parameter set
- Fast
- Very easy to use interface for routine work
- Pick-up truck version
5Highlights
- ENSIM pre and post processor
- Grouped Response Units GRUs
- Wetland model coupled river-wetland hydraulics
(also bank storage) - Tracer model flow sourcing (glaciers,
groundwater, wetlands, etc.) - There are many other useful features
6EnsimHydrologic
- Developed by the Canadian Hydraulics Centre CHC
- Funded by Environment Canada
7Start with a DEM S. Ontario in this case
L. Huron
Waterloo
Toronto
EnsimHydrologic work space
L. Ontario
8Delineate drainage Watersheds automatically
Specify WATFLOOD grid.
9Zoom edit data
Extract WATFLOOD data
10Watflood Theory GRUs Grouped Response Units
11Elmira LANDSAT
- 10 km grid (or whatever)
- 100 km2 area receives equal meteorological
input - group all areas with similar hydrological
characteristics within a grid for 6 hydrological
computations/grid - some people model each pixel or each field
separately - ok for science, not operations (104
computations/grid)
12(No Transcript)
13Percent Coniferous Forest Source USGS GLOBAL
LAND COVER CHARACTERISTICS DATA BASE
14Percent Crops Source USGS GLOBAL LAND COVER
CHARACTERISTICS DATA BASE
15Hydrological Modelling
Model executed for each land cover GRU on each
Grid each Hour
16Previous experience
- Original model setup calibration for the Grand
River watershed in S. Ontario - Applications include
- Columbia River N. of US Border 50,000 km2
- Mackenzie River 1,7000,000 km2
- Rhone, Rhine, Po and Danube rivers as part of MAP
(Mesoscale Alpine Project)
17MAP (Fall 1999) Computed flows compared to
observed flows for the Danube River in Germany
Austria Met data from the high resolution MC2
Numerical Weather Model MC2 WATFLOOD
3 km grid
18Tracer Module Components
Tracer 0 Baseflow separation
Tracer 1 Sub-basin separation
Tracer 2 Land-cover separation
Tracer 3 Rain-on-stream tracer
Tracer 4 Flow-type separation - surface -
interflow - baseflow
Tracer 5 Snow-melt as a fn(flow-type) - surface
surface melt - interflow melt drainage -
baseflow interflow melt drainage
Tracer 6 Glacial Melt - surface - interflow -
baseflow
19Model verification
- E.G. Baseflow has been compared to isotope
analysis of streamflow sources - All other model components have been similarly
verified
20Great Lakes Ottawa River Model
- Meteorological Data
- 6 hour Synoptic data for initial setup for
October 2000 August 2003 - 3 hour GEM (Global Environmental Model) data for
July August 2003
21(No Transcript)
22- Movie clip is an example of distributed Synoptic
Data - (Note the moving Bulls eyes)
23Synoptic data
24- Next movie clip is for July 2003 using GEM data
- (GEM is Canadas operational weather forcasting
model)
25(No Transcript)
26Animation of Snow Cover (SWE in mm)
27(No Transcript)
28Animation of Grid Outflow
29(No Transcript)
30Flow stations Canada only (to date)
31Computed hydrographs for 50 Sub-Watersheds
400-13500 km2
32(No Transcript)
33Lake Routing
Superior
St. Marys R.
Ottawa R.
GB
Michigan
Huron
St. Lawrence R.
Ontario
St. Clair R.
Niagara R.
Detroit R.
Erie
34Lake Routing Rules (natural state) St. Marys
River Q 824.7(SUP-181.43)1.5 St. Clair
River Q 82.2((MHUSTC)/2-166.98)1.87(MHU-ST
C)0.36 Detroit River Q 28.8(STC-164.91)2.2
8(STC-ERI)0.305 Niagara River Q
558.3(ERI-169.86)1.60 St. Lawrence River Q
555.823(Oswego-0.0014(Year-1985)-69.474)1.5
35Needs work. Ave. lake levels are ok. Variation is
inadequate. Effect of weeds, ice operations not
yet incorporated.
36Summary
- Great tools are required to model large areas
such as the Great Lakes Ottawa River basin. - Pre-processor set up watershed files
- Post-processor debugging visualization
- GRUs ensure vastly different hydrological units
are represented appropriately at the large scale - Gridded model
- Efficient ingestion of gridded data DEM, Land
cover, meteorological data (radar, numerical
weather models) - Much tweaking to be done!