Modelling the Entire Great Lakes and the Ottawa River Watershed PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modelling the Entire Great Lakes and the Ottawa River Watershed


1
Modelling the Entire Great Lakes and the Ottawa
River Watershed
Nick Kouwen Department of Civil
Engineering University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
,Canada
http//www.watflood.ca
2
With a large amount of help from Environment
Canada Alain Pietroniro (Watershed setup) Pierre
Pellerin (Synoptic NWM data) Champa Neal (Flow
data)
3
Geography Lesson
Superior
St. Marys R.
Ottawa R.
GB
Michigan
Huron
St. Lawrence R.
Ontario
St. Clair R.
Niagara R.
Detroit R.
Erie
4
WATFLOOD Features
  • Primary application is flood forecasting and
    flood studies
  • Long time series for climate studies and
    frequency analysis
  • Ability to model regions from a few km2 to
    Millions of km2
  • Automated watershed setup (ENSIM, MAPMAKER,
    TOPAZ)
  • Optimal use of gridded data
  • eg. Land cover, DEMs, NWP model output, Radar
    data
  • Universally applicable parameter set
  • Fast
  • Very easy to use interface for routine work
  • Pick-up truck version

5
Highlights
  • ENSIM pre and post processor
  • Grouped Response Units GRUs
  • Wetland model coupled river-wetland hydraulics
    (also bank storage)
  • Tracer model flow sourcing (glaciers,
    groundwater, wetlands, etc.)
  • There are many other useful features

6
EnsimHydrologic
  • Developed by the Canadian Hydraulics Centre CHC
  • Funded by Environment Canada

7
Start with a DEM S. Ontario in this case
L. Huron
Waterloo
Toronto
EnsimHydrologic work space
L. Ontario
8
Delineate drainage Watersheds automatically
Specify WATFLOOD grid.
9
Zoom edit data
Extract WATFLOOD data
10
Watflood Theory GRUs Grouped Response Units
11
Elmira LANDSAT
  • 10 km grid (or whatever)
  • 100 km2 area receives equal meteorological
    input
  • group all areas with similar hydrological
    characteristics within a grid for 6 hydrological
    computations/grid
  • some people model each pixel or each field
    separately - ok for science, not operations (104
    computations/grid)

12
(No Transcript)
13
Percent Coniferous Forest Source USGS GLOBAL
LAND COVER CHARACTERISTICS DATA BASE
14
Percent Crops Source USGS GLOBAL LAND COVER
CHARACTERISTICS DATA BASE
15
Hydrological Modelling
Model executed for each land cover GRU on each
Grid each Hour
16
Previous experience
  • Original model setup calibration for the Grand
    River watershed in S. Ontario
  • Applications include
  • Columbia River N. of US Border 50,000 km2
  • Mackenzie River 1,7000,000 km2
  • Rhone, Rhine, Po and Danube rivers as part of MAP
    (Mesoscale Alpine Project)

17
MAP (Fall 1999) Computed flows compared to
observed flows for the Danube River in Germany
Austria Met data from the high resolution MC2
Numerical Weather Model MC2 WATFLOOD
3 km grid
18
Tracer Module Components
Tracer 0 Baseflow separation
Tracer 1 Sub-basin separation
Tracer 2 Land-cover separation
Tracer 3 Rain-on-stream tracer
Tracer 4 Flow-type separation - surface -
interflow - baseflow
Tracer 5 Snow-melt as a fn(flow-type) - surface
surface melt - interflow melt drainage -
baseflow interflow melt drainage
Tracer 6 Glacial Melt - surface - interflow -
baseflow
19
Model verification
  • E.G. Baseflow has been compared to isotope
    analysis of streamflow sources
  • All other model components have been similarly
    verified

20
Great Lakes Ottawa River Model
  • Meteorological Data
  • 6 hour Synoptic data for initial setup for
    October 2000 August 2003
  • 3 hour GEM (Global Environmental Model) data for
    July August 2003

21
(No Transcript)
22
  • Movie clip is an example of distributed Synoptic
    Data
  • (Note the moving Bulls eyes)

23
Synoptic data
24
  • Next movie clip is for July 2003 using GEM data
  • (GEM is Canadas operational weather forcasting
    model)

25
(No Transcript)
26
Animation of Snow Cover (SWE in mm)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Animation of Grid Outflow
29
(No Transcript)
30
Flow stations Canada only (to date)
31
Computed hydrographs for 50 Sub-Watersheds
400-13500 km2
32
(No Transcript)
33
Lake Routing
Superior
St. Marys R.
Ottawa R.
GB
Michigan
Huron
St. Lawrence R.
Ontario
St. Clair R.
Niagara R.
Detroit R.
Erie
34
Lake Routing Rules (natural state) St. Marys
River Q 824.7(SUP-181.43)1.5 St. Clair
River Q 82.2((MHUSTC)/2-166.98)1.87(MHU-ST
C)0.36 Detroit River Q 28.8(STC-164.91)2.2
8(STC-ERI)0.305 Niagara River Q
558.3(ERI-169.86)1.60 St. Lawrence River Q
555.823(Oswego-0.0014(Year-1985)-69.474)1.5
35
Needs work. Ave. lake levels are ok. Variation is
inadequate. Effect of weeds, ice operations not
yet incorporated.
36
Summary
  • Great tools are required to model large areas
    such as the Great Lakes Ottawa River basin.
  • Pre-processor set up watershed files
  • Post-processor debugging visualization
  • GRUs ensure vastly different hydrological units
    are represented appropriately at the large scale
  • Gridded model
  • Efficient ingestion of gridded data DEM, Land
    cover, meteorological data (radar, numerical
    weather models)
  • Much tweaking to be done!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com