Effect of a Maze Task on Salivary Cortisol of Pigs at Weaning and on Subsequent Fear Response - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Effect of a Maze Task on Salivary Cortisol of Pigs at Weaning and on Subsequent Fear Response

Description:

Effect of a Maze Task on Salivary Cortisol of Pigs at Weaning and on Subsequent Fear Response – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: janices6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effect of a Maze Task on Salivary Cortisol of Pigs at Weaning and on Subsequent Fear Response


1
Effect of a Maze Task on Salivary Cortisol of
Pigs at Weaning and on Subsequent Fear Response
  • J.M. Siegford, G. Rucker, A.J. Zanella
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Group
  • Dept. Animal Science, Michigan State University
  • East Lansing, MI 48824

2
Introduction
  • Learning, memory and regulation of the stress
    response are mediated by the brain region known
    as the hippocampus.
  • Learning memory
  • e.g., Bannerman et al., 2002 Castro et al.,
    1989 Maaswinkel et al., 1997 Rosenzweig et al.,
    2003
  • Stress
  • e.g., Blank et al., 2002 Broom Zanella, 2004
    Dachir et al., 1993 Fuchs Flugge, 2003 Kaiser
    et al., 2003 McEwen, 2001

3
Enhancing coping responses in pigs
  • Biologically relevant hippocampal-dependent tasks
    may help integrate cognitive processes,
    encouraging development of an adaptive stress
    response.
  • Cooper Cox, 2001
  • Neonatal handling alone does not benefit pigs.
  • e.g., Weaver et al., 2000

4
Hypothesis
  • Performing hippocampal-dependent tasks may reduce
    stress-related physiological and behavioral
    consequences of early-weaning.

Prediction
  • Piglets performing a maze task (MT) prior to
    weaning will show less stress at weaning, better
    ability to solve other spatial tasks, and lower
    subsequent fear responses.

5
Study Design
  • Piglets from 4 litters divided into 3 treatment
    groups
  • Hippocampal enhancement (HE, n9)
  • Isolation control (IC, n9)
  • Sow control (SC, n9)
  • Trained and tested in MT from 5-11 days of age
  • Number of trials taken to learn maze and time
    taken to solve maze were recorded

6
Study Design Maze Task
  • 4x/day on days 5-11
  • Max of 5 min/exposure and 10 min between exposures
  • Piglets trained in
  • the maze by
  • shaping

7
Study Design
  • Piglets weaned by litter on day 12
  • Piglets tested for spatial memory using a water
    maze task at 14 days of age
  • (Laughlin Zanella, 2003)
  • Fear response of pigs examined using open field
    tests at 49-51 days of age

8
Study Design Water Maze
  • Spatial memory task on day 14
  • 5 exposures separated by 10 min intervals
  • Maximum of 20s to solve the task
  • Exposure ends when pig locates and stands on
    platform
  • Latency to reach platform is recorded

9
Study Design Open Field
  • 3 open field (OF) tests over days 49-51
  • OF1 alone
  • OF2 w/ball
  • OF3 w/person
  • 5 min total
  • 1 min for acclimation
  • 4 min of testing

chair
ball
Gate
10
Study Design
  • Additional measures taken
  • Weights taken daily until 21 days of age, then
    weekly until 49 days of age
  • Saliva collected before and after the last MT,
    weaning, water maze, and open field tests

11
Cortisol Levels at MT
  • Saliva was collected immediately before and after
    the MT on day 11 to measure cortisol


P 0.04
12
Cortisol Levels at Weaning
P lt 0.001
13
Water Maze
  • Male IC pigs were slower to escape the maze than
    pigs of all other groups

P 0.07
14
Fear Response at 50 days
  • Pigs spent less time in the center of the open
    field in OF1 compared to OF3

b
a
P lt 0.001
15
Fear Response at 50 days
  • IC pigs spent more time in the periphery in OF1
    than did IC or HE pigs in OF3

P 0.03
16
Fear Response at 50 days
  • In OF3, HE touched the unfamiliar person more
    times than pigs in other groups

P 0.008
17
Body Weights
  • No differences were seen in weights of piglets at
    weaning or up to 7 weeks of age (P gt 0.05 in all
    cases)

18
Implications
  • Handling alone was not responsible for changes
    seen in behavior
  • All animals were handled to a similar degree
  • MT may result in less fear of novel persons and
    places suggesting benefits of cognitive
    stimulation for young pigs.
  • MT did not negatively affect growth of pigs.

19
Thank you
  • The MSU Swine Teaching and Research Center
  • Cheryl Leece
  • MSU McNair/SROP Program
  • USDA NRI 2001-2440 to A.J. Zanella funded this
    study
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com