Innovation in Next Generation Environmental Technologies: Benefits and Barriers

1 / 101
About This Presentation
Title:

Innovation in Next Generation Environmental Technologies: Benefits and Barriers

Description:

Innovation in Next Generation Environmental Technologies: Benefits and Barriers – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:391
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 102
Provided by: parrymn

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Innovation in Next Generation Environmental Technologies: Benefits and Barriers


1
Innovation in Next Generation Environmental
Technologies Benefits and Barriers
Center for Environmentally Responsible Solvents
and Processes Innovation Process Seminar
Series February 19, 2004
Parry M. Norling Visiting Fellow Chemical
Heritage Foundation Parry.norling_at_comcast.net
2
Wall St. Journal-1992
3
Wall St. Journal Front Page
  • despite spending of more than 13 billion on
    chemical and related research over the past 10
    years, DuPonts 5,000 scientists and engineers
    were a technological black hole

4
More
  • They sucked in money but, Company officials
    concede, didnt turn out a single all new
    blockbuster or even many innovations.
  • The technology is great, but wheres the payoff?

5
Another Nylon or Teflon (R)?
1938 Nylon, Teflon and Butacite
1940
1935 Better things for better living... through
chemistry
6
Success Rate New Products
125 beginning projects .8
300 submitted ideas .3
3000 raw ideas .03
1.7 launches 60
9 Large developments 11
4 major developments 25
1 commercial success
Stevens and Burley Research-Technology Management
May-June 1997
7
Innovation Not a Linear Process
Technology developments
Changes in the external environment
Market knowledge
Company strategies
Knowledge of customer needs
Scientific advances
IDEAS
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
MARKET PENETRATION AND DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT/ TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
SCREENING AND BUSINESS ANALYSIS
DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION
8
Innovation Not a Linear Process
Technology developments
Technology Intelligence
Changes in the external environment
Market knowledge
Company strategies
Knowledge of customer needs
Scientific advances
IDEAS
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
MARKET PENETRATION AND DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT/ TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Technology Valuation and Creation of Benefits
SCREENING AND BUSINESS ANALYSIS
DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION
9
Innovation Not a Linear Process
Technology developments
Creativity Idea Generation Breakthroughs
Changes in the external environment
Market knowledge
Company strategies
Knowledge of customer needs
Scientific advances
IDEAS
Quality of the research
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
MARKET PENETRATION AND DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT/ TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Knowledge Management important throughout the
entire process- critical in the recycle loops
SCREENING AND BUSINESS ANALYSIS
DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION
10
Some Successes
11
Kevlar and Surlyn
12
Development
Both started with a defined need
Surprising lab discovery YES YES Making the
discovery practical YES Developing a
manufacturing process YES DIFFICULT Overcoming
the process hurdles YES DIFFICULT Overcoming
the financial hurdles YES SOME Finding the
markets -- applications DIFFICULT EVOLVING Facing
the unexpected YES Facing death YES Makin
g it a success YES YES
13
Kevlar The real story
A spacecraft that crashed 50 years ago contained
fibers that even razors could not cut through
14
Discovery of Lyotropic Liquid Crystallinity
1965
  • Stephanie Kwolek discovery processable high
    molecular weight para-aromatic polyamides
  • Discovered that concentrated liquid crystalline
    solutions of such polymers could be spun from
    tetramethylurea

O
H
C
N
n
poly(benzamide)
15
1,4B Not the Right Polymer!
  • Difficult to purify
  • Low concentrations
  • Borderline fiber properties
  • Superior product from paraphenylene diamine and
    terephthalic acid (PPD-T)?

Herbert Blades, Paul Morgan, Stephanie Kwolek,
John Griffing, Eugene Magat
16
A major breakthrough by Herb Blades -- 1969
  • Tried 100 sulfuric acid as spin solvent -- 10
    PPD-T -- little improvement in properties over
    1,4B
  • Surprise poly(PPD-T) and sulfuric acid form a
    complex melting at 80 degrees C. which is stable
    at higher temperatures
  • Used an air gap before coagulation

Morgan,Blades,Kwolek
Gave birth to Kevlar
17
Strong Fibers from Liquid Crystals
H
N
O
C
C
N
O
n
H
Quench and remove solvent
Draw liquid Xtals into oriented fiber
Lyotropic solution
18
Creating the Ultimate Fiber
  • Traditional synthetic fibers get strength from
    drawing to align the polymer molecules
  • Alignment is limited by molecular entanglement
  • Kevlar fiber strength comes from aligning the
    molecules before forming the fiber
  • Lyotropic crystals are oriented by liquid shear
    in the fiber forming process
  • Rigid molecular chain is key to creating the
    Lyotropic phase
  • Fiber is quenched to hold molecular orientation

19
Scale-up
  • Dealing with sulfuric acid
  • Disposal of the spinning solution very pure
    gypsum (7 pounds for every pound of fiber)

20
Scale-up a major surprise!
  • Toxicity of the polymerization solvent
    Hexamethylphosphoramide 40 man-years of
    technical effort

21
Demonstrate the market potential of Kevlar
Fortune Magazine Kevlar was a miracle in
search of a market
  • Must justify 400MM investment
  • Systems Engineering to develop the
    opportunities Ropes and cables, Aircraft
    composites
  • Tire reinforcement a bust
  • Considerable application development!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Commercialized in 1971
  • By 1975 only 10 market segments -- 50
    applications
  • Today -- more than 200 applications

22
(No Transcript)
23
Kevlar - A Reality
24
The Surlyn Story
Creation of the first ionomer
25
Initial History
A tough transparent crystal clear polymer!
  • Early 1960s Development of ethylene copolymers
    with functionality
  • Desire to crosslink these polymers
  • Preparation of sodium salt of ethylene/methacrylic
    acid copolymers -- as a control experiment

26
Interchain ionic bonds create
  • melt strength
  • solid state toughness
  • resistance to oils

27
A customer?
28
Late 1960s Time of Crisis
  • Too many possible products- low sales
  • Complex manufacturing process
  • Market development was tough
  • Product was losing money

29
Surlyn on Golf Balls?
30
Recognition
31
More and more applications
32
Three lessons
  • Technology driven research switched eventually to
    market driven research
  • Properties that customers came to value were
    quite different from what was first expected
  • Dedication, commitment, and patience by many
    unique individuals allowed the product to survive

33
Conclusions
  • Technology was cleverly developed (good science)
  • Developing the technology was not at all easy
  • Technology initially sought markets
  • Markets found unappreciated properties or needed
    much help in applying the technology
  • Individuals exerted themselves to keep the
    products alive
  • Surlyn and Kevlar are now premier products

34
Failures
35
Packaging Products Important Market
  • Mylar PET film
  • Surlyn Ionomer resins
  • Bynel adhesives
  • Clysar shrink wrap
  • Elvax resins
  • Nucrel acid copolymers
  • PET bottle royalties
  • nylon films and resins

36
Growing packaging market
  • Opportunitypolymer replacement for rigid
    packaging (glass and metal)-- strategic
  • Need good oxygen and gas barrier properties
  • Several candidates
  • PVDC
  • PET
  • metalized plastics
  • ethylene-vinyl alcohol polymer (EVOH) multilayer
    package

37
EVOH is the Target
  • Related to two DuPont Products Ethylene/vinyl
    acetate polymers and polyvinylalcohol
  • Multilayer extrusion technology now available

ethylene vinyl acetate Elvax vinyl
resins
vinyl acetate polyvinyl acetate
Elvanol polyvinyl alcohol
Polyethylene or polypropylene, adhesive, EVOH,
adhesive, polyethylene or polypropylene
38
But
  • Kuraray and Nippon Gohsei have plants in Japan
  • Kuraray forming joint venture (Evalca) to
    manufacture in United States
  • Critical process patents held by the Japanese
  • No competitive advantage

39
Strategy
  • Get to the market fast -- before Evalcas plant
    is on stream keep Nippon Gohsei from building
    more capacity
  • Get competitive advantage in product or process
    innovation

40
Issues
  • Joint venture? Kuraray - no, Nippon Gohsei a
    possibility
  • How to make developmental quantities to get into
    the market rapidly?
  • 20MM for pilot plant?

41
More Issues
  • How to forecast a competitive advantage when your
    are me-too?
  • How to develop a favorable economic case?

42
Some decisions
  • No Joint venture
  • Develop batch semiworks to supply product for
    market development - not thorough basic data
  • Seek breakthroughs in both process and product --
    prudent risk, process simplification, process
    modification to get product advantage.

43
More Decisions
  • Full speed ahead even though venture manager and
    business say it is not justified
  • Commit to cutting 20 off investment
  • Commit to making breakthroughs
  • Commit to favorable market forecasts

44
EVOH Process
Low pressure polymerization
E
Stripper
alcoholysis
VAc
VAc
precipitation
grinding
drying
extrusion
additives
EVOH for sale
four steps with new technology
45
Piloting
  • Semiworks as batch with no integration -- product
    from one step taken to the next
  • Polymerization ran for 2 years, terminated during
    detailed engineering
  • Stripping and alcoholysis 1300 scale
  • Precipitation 1500 scale
  • Reliance on process simulation

46
Results
  • 18 months to start up
  • Could not get rate
  • Could not get quality (color, gel...)
  • Questions on operability
  • Could not justify 30MM to make needed changes
  • Nippon Gohsei now has the plant

47
Today
48
Some common lessons
  • Compounding risks -- what is a prudent risk?
  • Extent of piloting
  • Resources
  • Thorough understanding of the realistic business
    case
  • When to go after the breakthrough technologies?
  • Managing expectations

49
Next Generation Environmental Technologies
Benefits and Barriers MR 1682-OSTP

Parry Norling, Robert Lempert, Susan Resetar,
Chris Pernin, and Sergej Mahnovski

50
Innovation Not a Linear Process
Technology developments
Most examples taken here
Changes in the external environment
Market knowledge
Company strategies
Knowledge of customer needs
Scientific advances
IDEAS
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
MARKET PENETRATION AND DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT/ TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
SCREENING AND BUSINESS ANALYSIS
DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION
51
(No Transcript)
52
Benefits from NGETs
  • Environmental Reduction in
  • Toxics (TRI) (toxicity weighted index)
  • Carcinogens- (specific chemicals removed from
    environment)
  • Endocrine Disrupters- (Specific chemicals
    removed)
  • Persistent materials- (quantity of specific
    chemicals)
  • Greenhouse gases- (CO2, Nitrous oxide, methane,)
  • Total waste generated- (total pounds), reduction
    of resources
  • Damage to the eco-system- (specific materials)

53
Benefits from NGETs
  • Security
  • Critical materials
  • Quantities of stored hazardous materials
    terrorist targets
  • Less energy energy efficiency
  • Worker safety
  • Performance/economics
  • Quality, improved product performance
  • New green markets
  • Reduced manufacturing costs
  • Reduced regulatory compliance costs

54
Case studies
  • Description of the chemistry and/or science and
    technology involved. Principles? Why can this be
    done now but not before?
  • Sectors affected now and in the future
  • Immediate benefits
  • Long-range benefits

55
Case studies
  • Development/commercialization history What firms
    are currently developing and commercializing this
    technology? For what purpose? How successful?
  • Incentives to adopt Were firms responding to
    existing or expected regulations? Did they see a
    competitive advantage? Any customer pressures? Is
    the technology proprietary?
  • Barriers to adoption What have been the chief
    barriers holding back commercialization?
  • Government role What has been the government
    role to date in the development and
    commercialization

56
Case studies
  • 1. Use of supercritical or liquid CO2 as solvent
  • Surfactants enabling use of supercritical CO2 as
    solvent in dry cleaning and precision cleaning
    (chip manufacture)
  • Production of fluoropolymers
  • Decaffeination of coffee
  • 2. A three step process replaced a six step
    process for manufacture of ibuprofen
  • 3.Converting polymers to monomers for recycle
    PET and Nylon

57
Bio-based processes
  • Use of renewable feedstocks (biomass) in
    conventional chemical processes
  • Fermentation using immobilized or free cells with
    renewable feedstocks involving a number of
    stepwise reactions
  • Use of enzymes as biocatalysts single reaction
  • Use of animals or green plants to process
    renewable feedstocks

58
Case studies
  • 4. Bio-based processes 47 including
  • Use of genetically altered Echerichia coli to
    produce adipic acid, Catechol, and substitute for
    BHT
  • 1,3 propanediol from glucose, polyester
    intermediate
  • biopulping
  • Enzymatic Production of acrylamide from
    acrylonitrile
  • Production of Vitamin B-2
  • Biocatalytic Production of 5-Cyanovaleramide.
  • Removal of metals from mine water by biotreatment
  • Conversion of waste biomass to animal feed,
    chemicals and fuels

59
Substitution of Green Chemistry
20
10
Take over time
5.0
?
f(new) f(old)
2.0
1.0
5
.2
.1
Fisher-Pry Technology adoption model
.05
.02
.01
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2040 2050 2060 2070
2080 2090
60
Substitution of Bio-based Processes
Bio-based processes- substitution in industry
sectors (fraction of processes that gave
environmental benefits)
20
Pulp paper (100)
10
5.0
f(new) f(old)
2.0
Pharma/fine chemicals (50-75)
1.0
5
.2
.1
.05
Commodity chemicals (75-100)
.02
.01
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2040 2050 2060 2070
2080 2090
61
Case studies
  • 5. Pulp and paper processes
  • Delignification and bleaching of pulp in paper
    manufacture without the use of chlorine or
    chlorine dioxide
  • 6. Room temperature ionic liquids
  • 7. Dimethyl carbonate
  • 8. Process for Production of Cytovene potent
    antiviral agent
  • 9. Production of Hydrogen Peroxide directly from
    Hydrogen and Oxygen in CO2
  • 10. Advanced oil and gas exploration and
    production technologies
  • 11. Various approaches to water purification
  • 12. Capture of nitrous oxide in adipic acid
    manufacture to use in new phenol process

62
Case studies

13. Wood Preservation 14. Production of
polyaspartic acid (PAA) 15. Sentricon Termite
Colony Elimination System 16. Inert anodes in
aluminum smelting 17.High yield melting of
aluminum 18. Elimination of Ozone-Depleting
Chemicals in the Printed Wire Board and
Electronic Assembly and Test Processes
63
Surmounting Barriers
  • Many barriers
  • Success will require overcoming a number of
    barriers for NGETs

64
Technical barriers
  • Production of hydrogen peroxide directly from
    hydrogen and oxygen
  • Biobased process for adipic acid
  • Inert Anodes in Aluminum smelting
  • Dimethyl carbonate
  • Biobased process for 1,3 propanediol

65
Benefits Inert anodes
66
Infrastructure barriers
  • Capture of Nitrous oxide from adipic acid
    manufacture to use in new phenol process
  • New routes to vinyl acetate and ethyl acetate
  • Synthesis of glyphosate

67
Reuse of Nitrous Oxide
68
Taking advantage of infrastructure needs
  • Glyphosate
  • Vinyl acetate and ethyl acetate

69
Institutional Barriers
  • New route to Ibuprofen
  • Roundup Ready Soybeans, Corn, Cotton

70
Market Barriers
Barriers in the marketplace
  • Polylactides
  • Supercritical carbon dioxide in dry cleaning
  • Recycling PET and nylon to monomers
  • TAML catalysts for oxidations with hydrogen
    peroxide
  • Converting waste power carbon dioxide into algae
    and then organic feedstocks

Incentives to adopt
71
Case studies
Production of polylactides
72
Incentives to adopt
  • Reluctance of the pulp and paper industry
  • Not enough concern over global warming

73
Some Conclusions
  • Green chemistry-based processes are being
    commercialized at a somewhat increasing rate.
  • The primary driving force is cost regulatory
    compliance is most often secondary.
  • The benefits can be measured and documented.
  • The potential environmental benefits are
    significant.
  • .

74
Some Conclusions
  • But it will take years to reach these benefits at
    the present rate of commercialization.
  • A number of actions are needed to overcome the
    barriers much advice from the management
    literature

75
Overcoming technical barriers
  • Developing the best ideas
  • Discovery based planning attacking the critical
    assumptions
  • Organizing the resources

76
Overcoming infrastructure barriers
  • Include issue in the research plan

77
Overcoming the Institutional Barriers
  • Some lessons from Paul Light
  • Researchers must influence policy-makers

78
Overcoming the Market Barriers
  • Crossing the chasm
  • Technology and Market Intelligence
  • Knowing where you are on the Familiarity Matrix
  • Governmental action

79
Crossing the Chasm
80
Technology or Product
New to world New to firm Familiar
Markets
Suicide square
Familiar New to firm New
to the world
Familiarity Matrix can be used to decide how to
collaborate
81
Government Actions Affecting NGETs
  • Funding RD
  • Purchase/Procurement
  • Tax incentives/disincentives
  • Subsidies
  • Regulations workplace, emissions, products
  • Patent Law
  • Industry consultations
  • Voluntary programs
  • Infrastructure support and development
  • Education and training

82
l
83
Managing RD
  • Provide a broad commercial base - leverage
    research across diverse business lines.
  • Pick your problems with great care and judgment.
  • Be patient - dont evaluate results after one
    year, but wait as long as five or six.
  • Know when to quit a problem - done largely by
    intuition, but we prefer to call it intelligence.

Crawford Greenewalt 1950
84
Additional Slides
85
Bio-based processes performance/economics
  • Amino acid market a green chemistry market
  • Reduced manufacturing costs and reduced
    investment
  • Reduced regulatory costs

86
Bio-based processes long term benefits
The Committee on biobased Industrial Products of
the National Research Council Evaluation of
the environmental impacts of biobased industries
should be a research priority. These evaluations
should include environmental and energy audits of
the entire product life cycle rather than a
single manufacturing step or environmental
emission. Development of a biobased industry may
produce widespread environmental benefits, but
these implications are not well understood.
Production of agricultural and forest feedstocks
can have positive, negative, or neutral
consequences on wildlife, soil, air, and water
quality, but these effects depend on many
factors, such as previous use of land and crop
management practices. In specific instances
biobased processes are less polluting, and
biobased products are biodegradable. To ensure
that biobased products fulfill their promise of
environmental sustainability, life-cycle
assessments of biobased products should be a
research priority.
87
Supercritical carbon dioxide
  • Dry cleaning
  • Decaffeination
  • Polymerization of fluoropolymers

88
Benefits of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide
drycleaning

.
Figure 1. Comparison of a Model Facility's
Emissions of PCE. (SCCO2 supercritical carbon
dioxide CA carbon adsorber RC refrigerated
condensor)
89
Benefits Carbon Dioxide Decaffeination
  • Elimination of methylene chloride

90
Benefits carbon dioxide as polymerization solvent
  • Elimination of CFCs

91
Benefits from other cases
  • Dimethyl carbonate
  • PET and Nylon recycle

92
Benefits from other cases
  • Wood preservation
  • Ibuprofen
  • Hydrogen peroxide
  • Sentricon

93
Management Tools and Techniques Through the
Years
3rd/4th Generation Management.....
Learning Organization Knowledge Mgt.
Cycle-time Reduction
Empowerment
EVA
Pay-for-performance
Missions Visions
Portfolio Management
Excellence
Experience Curves
Core competencies
Disintermediation
COTs
Matrix Mgt.
Pecos River
Benchmarking
ROI
Org. Effectiveness
TQM
Platforms
Cost of Govt reg.
MBWA
Business Process Reengineering
MBO
Managerial grid
MBX
Intrapreneuring
HPWS
Theory X-Y
Balanced Scorecard
Theory Z
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
94
Benefits bio-based processes elimination of
toxics
  • Intermediate for cephalosporin antibiotics
  • N,N-dimethylaniline, trimethylchlorosilane,
    phosphorous pentachloride, methylene chloride,
    zinc salts
  • Bioleaching and minerals bioxidation
  • arsenic oxide, sulfur dioxide
  • Metals bioremediation and recovery
  • contaminated gypsum

95
Benefits bio-based processes elimination of
toxics
  • Intermediate for cephalosporin antibiotics
  • N,N-dimethylaniline, trimethylchlorosilane,
    phosphorous pentachloride, methylene chloride,
    zinc salts
  • Bioleaching and minerals bioxidation
  • arsenic oxide, sulfur dioxide
  • Metals bioremediation and recovery
  • contaminated gypsum

96
Bio-based processes elimination of carcinogens,
persistent materials
  • Pulp bleaching with enzymes 16 reduction in
    carcinogens and 12 reduction in heavy metals
  • Pulp bleaching in Japan 40 reduction of AOX

97
Bio-based processes- elimination of greenhouse
gas emissions
  • Polylactic acid
  • Powerhouse carbon dioxide to methane and acetic
    acid

98
Bio-based processes reduction in total waste
  • Riboflavin
  • air emissions- 50, water-66
  • Cephalexin
  • air and water-80
  • 5-cyanovaleramide
  • -126 metric tons of heavy metal catalyst waste

99
Table 1. Summary of case studies.
Principles themes
 
100
(No Transcript)
101
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)