Modeling secondary organic aerosols SOA: current achievements and future challenges PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 18
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling secondary organic aerosols SOA: current achievements and future challenges


1
Modeling secondary organic aerosols
(SOA)current achievements and future challenges
  • Kostas Tsigaridis,
  • Stelios Myriokefalitakis, Maria Kanakidou

2
O3
Gas-phase chemistry
??
POA
AVOC
BVOC
SOA
3
SOA production
gas-phase condensable products
T ?
absorbing aerosol phase
Potential of total evaporation ? Lower limit of
SOA formation
Upper limit of SOA formation
4
SOA formation a-pinene O3
5
SOA formation 2 product model
  • Keep critical information on
  • Chemical speciation
  • Optical properties
  • Hydrophilic/hydrophobic behaviour

Kp,1
a1
G1
A1
VOC
a2
G2
A2
Kp,2
6
VOC candidates
  • BVOC
  • isoprene
  • monoterpenes
  • sesquiterpenes
  • higher terpenoid compounds
  • others?
  • AVOC
  • aromatics
  • solvents
  • high C-chain hydrocarbons
  • others?

7
Processes that affect SOA production
  • Pre-existing aerosols
  • Oxidant levels
  • Gas-phase chemical composition (high/low NOx)
  • Relative humidity
  • UV light
  • Evaporated POA
  • Aged SOA
  • Others?

Kp,1
a1
G1
A1
VOC
a2
G2
A2
Kp,2
a3
Kp,3
G3
A3
a4
G4
A4
Kp,4
8
The simulations TM3 model
  • FULL (Tsigaridis and Kanakidou, AE, 2007)
  • 5 precursors (isoprene, a-pinene, ß-pinene,
    toluene, xylene)
  • 4 products per precursor (2 high-NOx, 2 low-NOx)
  • LUMPED_NOX_DEP
  • 5 precursors (isoprene, a-pinene, ß-pinene,
    toluene, xylene)
  • 2 products per precursor (high-NOx or low-NOx,
    depending)
  • NO_NOX_DEP
  • 5 precursors (isoprene, a-pinene, ß-pinene,
    toluene, xylene)
  • 2 products per precursor (low-NOx)
  • MINIMUM
  • 3 precursors (isoprene, a-pinene, toluene)
  • 2 products per precursor (low-NOx)

Preliminary results!
9
SOA burden variation
Chemical production 40-70 difference
10
SOA surface concentration, annual mean
FULL
LUMPED_NOX_DEP
NO_NOX_DEP
MINIMUM
ug m-3
11
Lumped cases difference surface
12
SOA zonal mean concentration, annual mean
FULL
LUMPED_NOX_DEP
NO_NOX_DEP
MINIMUM
ug m-3
13
Lumped cases difference zonal mean
14
Comparison with measurements CARBOSOL
Measurements FULL MINIMUM
15
Comparison with measurements
4 CARBOSOL stations
FULL MINIMUM
Units are ugC m-3, OM/OC 1.3
16
Perspectives
  • Burden differences compared to surface
    concentration changes reveal the importance of
    the free tropospheric SOA.
  • Distinction between POA and SOA is important in
    understanding why models and measurements
    (dis)agree. Emissions play a major role. This,
    though, might never happen (POA is semi-volatile
    Donahue et al., 2006 Robinson et al., 2007).
  • How should we treat the VOC reactivity?
  • Update the SOA formation mechanism by including
    the most recent chamber data of ?H, a and Kp
    (Offenberg et al., 2006 Henze et al., 2007). How
    should we treat sesquiterpenes (NOx dependence)?
  • More detailed comparison which will include
    measurements around the globe. If you have data
    available, do not hesitate kostas.tsigaridis_at_cea.
    fr
  • Detailed study of all different simulations.

17
Ideas
  • What POA means?
  • What SOA means?
  • Should we model POA/SOA, or HOA/OOA? Or something
    else, e.g. volatility groups?
  • Contribution of small molecules and cloud
    processing in SOA?

Source 1
POA
Evap. POA
Aged evap. POA
Source 2
SOA
Aged SOA
18
Thank you for your attention! kostas.tsigaridis_at_c
ea.fr From March 2008 _at_ NASA/GISS, New York
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com