Loads on the 5 K shield - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Loads on the 5 K shield

Description:

Coax cable (4) 1,20. HOM to structure. 0,28. 0,28. Current leads. 0,36. Beam tube bellows ... What is the price to pay _at_ 2K? From Tom Cryo spreadsheet (Feb07) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: PaoloP5
Category:
Tags: cable | loads | shield | tom

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Loads on the 5 K shield


1
Loads on the 5 K shield
lead to increase on static not the same MLI!
  • provide thermal intercepts
  • on the many penetrations!
  • couplers x 8 (9)
  • leads
  • cables
  • Shield surface provides
  • surface for thermal
  • strapping with small braids

2
What is the price to pay _at_ 2K?
  • From Tom Cryo spreadsheet (Feb07)
  • 2K 11.4 (1.7 s 9.7 d) _at_ 700 W/W
  • 5K 15.0 (10.6 s 4.4 d) _at_ 200 W/W
  • 40K 153.5 (59.2 s 94.3 d) _at_ 16 W/W
  • Sum 14.4 kW plug power for each module (no
    overcapacity)
  • If all 5K load goes into 2K as is
  • Plug power increased by 56
  • Need to provide same efficient radiation shield
    for the 2K mass, with at least 10 layers MLI
    protecting the 2K cold mass
  • If only radiation flow into 2K (consider factor 2
    increase for worse MLI protection) and all
    conduction intercepted
  • Plug power increased by 15
  • 5K thermalizaton for 3 posts, 8-9 couplers, HOM,
    leads, cables

3
Metric of comparison
  • Range of effect on plug power (operation cost) is
    15 to 55 under rather optimistic conditions
    given the many penetrations that the module has
    to the 2 K environment, and located at different
    positions along the transverse section (top
    support, side couplers)
  • Main difference with LHC case
  • Couplers would not support weight of bulky braids
  • To be on the lower side we need anyway a 5K cryo
    circuit for 90 of the conduction heat removal
  • What is the metric for the comparison of this
    operating cost hit?
  • The presence of the 5 K shield is in the module
    capital cost
  • if any, still questionable if many thermalization
    are needed

4
5 K thermal anchors
5
Modeling issues
  • Exchanging info with Norihito to decide
    simulation comparison metrics
  • INFN Type III ANSYS Model
  • Used for transient cooldown simulations
  • 2 Shields HeGRP / No vessels
  • Non linear material data
  • Convective time dependent heat load on integrated
    piping
  • Used so far to benchmark previous cooldown models
  • Not all conduction paths included (no couplers
    yet)
  • KEK STF Model

6
MLI
  • CERN data used so far
  • From r.t. to neglibible temperatures using 30
    layers MLI
  • 1 W/m2
  • From 80 K to neglibible temperaturs using 10
    layers MLI
  • 0.05 W/m2
  • Taking out 5 K shield how many layers of MLI?
  • What shielding efficiency?

7
From J.Weisend book
  • From Cry 3 DWGs
  • 30 MLI sheets in 24 mm, 32 layers/inch
  • 10 MLI sheets in 9 mm, 28 layers/inch
  • In literature (perfect installation of best
    blanket material)
  • 200 mW/m2 from r.t. 30 layers
  • 20 mW/m2 for 77 K 10 layers
  • 50 mW/m2 for 77 K 5 layers
  • Should we use?
  • 1 W/m2 30lay from r.t.
  • 50 mW/m2 10lay from 77K
  • 100 mW/m2 5lay from 77K

8
Shield temperature variations
  • Th is the hot boundary temperature

9
Validating model results
10
Thermal loads and boundaries
11
Exploring max gradient during cooldown
12
Gradient on 70 K shield
13
Heat flow on 70 K pipe during cooldown
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com