Title: Annabelle Pau
1From Lais to LC an account of experience on
HKU Libraries reclassification exercises
- Annabelle Pau Peter Sidorko
2Part 1Reclassification at HKU Libraries
3The previous practice
- HKU Libraries
- DDC
- Others
- Moys for Law
- Black for Dentistry
- Sequential numbers for microform
- Degree code for HKU theses
- Cutter system for HK gov doc,
- In-house classification schemes.
4The previous practice
- Fung Ping Shan Library
- Lai Yung Xiang (Modified)
- Modified DDC
- Doo Ding U Classification Scheme
- Sequential number for microform, etc
5The why?
- International standard for classification
- Collocation of materials
- Saving on Resources
- Conforming with local libraries
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Views of cataloguing staff
- The general sentiment was that the current FPS
Classification Scheme, being a hybrid and mixture
of elements from several schemes, is difficult to
apply and often results in a great deal of
inconsistency in application. There was a
general agreement that the current status cannot
continue.
11Views of FPSL cataloguing staff
- Among the existing classification schemes, which
do you consider the most appropriate for FPSL? - 1st choice Library of Congress Classification
(12) - 2nd choice Lai Yung Xiang (23)
- 3rd Choice Chinese Library Classification (30)
- DDC scheme was ruled out because of its
extremely inadequate treatment of Chinese
language materials - lowest scores indicate top choice
12Views of Cataloguing Department
- If FPSL decide to adopt another classification,
should the rest of the University Libraries also
change? - Re-classifying to achieve uniformity 11
- Maintaining separate classifications 3
13Views of Dept/Section Heads(Main Library and
Branches)
- If FPSL decide to adopt another classification,
should the rest of the University Libraries also
change? - Re-classifying to achieve uniformity 6
- Maintaining separate classifications 3
14Decisions
- Given the current situation and condition of
classification in the FPSL, it would be in the
best interest of the Library to reclassify its
collection. - In spite of its imperfections and bias, the
Library of Congress Classification emerges as the
top candidate to replace the FPSL Classification
Scheme. - While, in principle, the staff favors a unified
approach to classification for the entire library
system, should the issue of re-classifying the
rest of the library come up in the future, it
should be carefully re-examined in view of the
FPSL experiences and any new developments in
bibliographic control and technology and take
into consideration users reactions to the
prospect of re-classifying the entire collections
at the point of decision making.
15Part 2Reclassification at HKU Libraries
16FPS re-labeling project
- Result of consultants recommendations
- Special committee formed in 2002 for the
implementation of the project - After considering various factors, it was decided
that -
- Reclassification of FPS materials started with
the re-labeling of items of which LC numbers can
be downloaded from external sources - Materials in closed stack and remote storage were
given lowest priority in re-class. - All items required manual re-class remained
un-touch until all items with LC numbers
downloaded were done.
17Project progress
- Project became Operational Priority 4.1 after the
2004 annual library retreat with the setting up
of project team - Large scale de-selecting and relocating exercise
was carried out prior to start of project
because - No decanting areas for the re-labeled materials.
- less used FPS materials have to be relocated to
vacate shelf space for subsequent reshuffle of
shelving for the re-labeled materials.
18Project scope
- 159,730 items with LC numbers downloaded were
waiting to be re-labeled on 5/F 6/F of the FPS
library when the project officially kicked off in
September 2004 - These items included
- FPS general collection
- FPS Large Book
- FPS Large Reference
- FPS Taiwan Collection
- FPS Reference Collection
19Logistics planning
- Factors which affected logistics plan and work
flow of the re-labeling project - Space available
- Human factors
- labor available
- peoples prefer way of operation - smooth
workflow enable efficient productivity in a
labor-intensive work environment
20Space available
- No extra floor space can be used as decanting
areas for the re-labeled materials - Workflow designed must ensure the least moving
around of items for the convinence of users,
helpers and shelvers
21Work area of the Re-labeling team
22Labor available
- When project team set up we hired 3 temporary
helpers specifically for the project - Retrieval and re-labeling of items mainly 3
helpers - Re-shelving, compacting and shuffling of
re-labeled materials relies on Access Services
Department colleagues - Design of workflow need to consider reducing any
duplication of retrieving re-shelving efforts
of the 3 re-labeling helpers and ASD colleagues
23Logistics
- Re-labeling team decided that basic logistics for
relabeling to be - Items came off shelves in Lais
- Items went back to shelves in LC
- Former Systems Analysis, Mr. William Ko, first
retrieved from INNOPAC all items that got LC
numbers downloaded - Sort them in alphabetical sequence and
transformed to EXCEL format - ALL A class items finished re-labeling before
moving onto B class and so on and so forth.
24- Each LC class were again sorted in original Lais
sequence within each EXCEL files before label
printing - Facilitate re-labeling helpers to retrieve items
from shelves efficiently which was arranged in
original Lais sequence before any re-labeling
done
25With very large LC class such as P class (50387
items in total) more analysis within each sub
class e.g. from P, PA to PZ need to be done in
order to enable ASD colleagues to have a clearer
idea on what to expect in shelving and reshuffle
of items
26- Large .txt files contained original barcode range
3 helpers being assigned each day which were
converted to text format - Small .txt file contained the re-labeled item
barcodes scanned by helpers each day - Every day scanned barcode from the 3 helpers will
be saved as .txt file and merged together as one
file called SMALL.TXT with date as file name - Original barcode range assigned to them were
converted and named LARGE.TXT again with date
stamped
27- Script which William put on INNOPAC compared the
two .txt files and identified those missing or
out on loan items on INNOPAC needed re-labeling - Script marked those items identified in LARGE.txt
but not in SMALL.txt on INNOPAC item message
field to alert ASD colleagues about any missing
or returned items to be returned to re-labeling
team - Script also replaced ORIGINAL Lais number with
LC in call number field with item barcode found
in both large and small.txt
28- Items not found on shelves and scanned by
re-labeling helpers (e.g. those out on loan or
missing) but contained in the original EXCEL
files (LARGE.txt) will then be marked with an
item message Return to Annabelle by the script
items would be shipped for re-labeling upon its
returning to library
29These item messages would then be removed or
leave blank by the script on INNOPAC after label
changed and barcode scanned as .txt files.
30Statistics
- Statistics of FPS items when project team
disbanded on 15th of November 2005 - 155,528 FPS items relabeled since project started
September 2004 an average of 3500 items being
re-labeled on a 5 days working week basis in not
more than a year - 1, 887 FPS items NOT on loan NOR can be found on
shelves (missing?) - 895 FPS items with NO barcodes i.e. title call
nos. found on spine labels and on INNOPAC but no
barcodes were being supplied in the barcode field
of the III item records - 36,027 titles or 43,236 volumes of FPS items
needed manual re-class
31Recommendations on follow up actions
- For the 1,887 items in category C were to declare
missing after searching done - ASD colleagues searched if items really missing
- If confirmed considered whether replacements
are necessary - If not replacing TS colleagues need to
remove/suppress bibliographical records from OPAC
so as not to confuse users - For the 895 items without barcode
- Replace the barcode on items
- Update the records on INNOPAC
- Recommend to be followed up by TS.
- For the 1,036 items out on loan either
- To call back all 1036 items for re-labeling OR
- To re-label each one as they come back each day
if they cant be back before re-labeling team
disband
32Achievements
- Thorough stock take of CJK materials
- Relegate of less used materials
- Great uniformity of the CJK collections
- An easier classification systems for users
- Re-labeling project finished way ahead of the
original estimated time because of faster
processing speed (In the original project plan it
was estimated each day 7 trolleys of books were
being done i.e. _at_90 books x 7 630 books)