Rules - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Rules

Description:

Harold Boley, Benjamin Grosof, Michael Sintek, Said Tabet, Gerd Wagner: RuleML ... Grosof and Harold Boley: 'Introduction to RuleML', s of teleconference ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: atill
Category:
Tags: boley | michael | rules

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rules


1
CmpE 583- Web Semantics Theory and
PracticeRULES RULE MARKUP
  • Atilla ELÇI
  • Computer Engineering Department
  • Eastern Mediterranean University

2
Introduction
  • On top of ontologies layer there rests rules
    layer in the semantic Web protocol stack.
  • Rules are of differing nature / purpose (the rule
    spectrum)
  • Derivation rules
  • Transformation rules
  • Reaction rules
  • Rules serve to
  • Specify queries and inferences in Web ontologies,
  • Mappings between Web ontologies, and
  • Dynamic Web behaviors of workflows, services, and
    agents.
  • Rules can be stated in natural language, some
    formal notation, or in a combination of both.

3
Agenda
  • Rules facts
  • RuleML (Rule Markup Language)
  • Ontology rule languages like the Semantic Web
    Rule Language (SWRL), which combine RuleML with
    OWL.
  • Rule Interchange Format initiative at W3C.

4
Rules Facts TBL-1998
  • The Semantic Web is a universal space for
    anything which can be expressed in classical
    logic. (NB try reverse this sentence
    implication is anything of classical logic is in
    the Semantic web!).
  • Many knowledge representation systems exist. All
    distinguish data and rules
  • Data pool of info expressed in a simple
    language (NB but not in a natural language).
  • Rules
  • Control the inference steps
  • Written in a restricted language (NB so to
    maintain computability)
  • Aim at preserving computability.
  • Conveys two separate pieces of info
  • Classic logic fact (NB as embedded in the rule
    system)
  • Deduced-implied finding (NB that is, append all
    rules as extracted from fact documentation and
    their implication).
  • The Semantic Web uses the classical logic.
  • Inconsistent data is tolerated because trust is
    based on verified reputation of the source. (NB
    Every document has its truth system user
    consumes that whose creator/conveyor he/she knows
    as reputable and trusts).

5
RuleML docs RuleML Homesite
  • Rules can be stated in natural language, in some
    formal notation, or in a combination of both.
  • Being in the 'semiformal' category, the RuleML
    Initiative is working towards an XML-based markup
    language that permits Web-based rule storage,
    interchange, retrieval, and firing/application.
  • RuleML covers the entire rule spectrum, from
    derivation rules to transformation rules to
    reaction rules. RuleML can thus specify queries
    and inferences in Web ontologies, mappings
    between Web ontologies, and dynamic Web behaviors
    of workflows, services, and agents.
  • Aiming for business intelligence, AI?
  • Harold Boley RuleML Initial Steps, Version 1.0.
    2002-08-22.
  • Harold Boley, Benjamin Grosof, Michael Sintek,
    Said Tabet, Gerd Wagner RuleML Design, Version
    0.8. 2002-09-03.

6
RuleML presentations
  • By Benjamin N. Grosof and Harold Boley
  • "Introduction to RuleML", slides of
    teleconference talk (in pdf).
  • "Part 2 of 2 Additional Optional Slides" (in
    pdf).
  • "RuleML Intro Examples and More Syntax Details".
  • The RuleML Tutorial.

7
Rule Layer Work
  • Rule Interchange Format initiative at W3C
  • See the charter
  • Especially the RIF Use Cases and Requirements
    document.
  • RuleML Initiative vied to merge with DAML, OASIS,
    W3C, or US/EU Joint Committee (JC) in search of a
    home base some years ago. Still independent!
  • In effect, JC merged with DAML and later DAMLOIL
    merged with W3C. So now, OASIS, W3C RuleML
    Initiative are still going their separate ways.

8
Five Publications from RIF-WG of W3C
  • The Rule Interchange Format (RIF) Working Group
    published five new Working Drafts today. Since
    the Last Call Working Draft of RIF Basic Logic
    Dialect (BLD), the group has been developing
    other key dialects, components, and test cases.
    The new publications are
  • RIF Use Cases and Requirements minor changes
  • RIF Core new design to support both BLD and PRD
  • RIF Datatypes and Built-Ins 1.0 various
    improvements
  • RIF Production Rule Dialect (PRD) operational
    semantics are complete
  • RIF Test Cases early stages of test suite
  • The Working Group is nearing Last Call on these
    remaining elements of RIF, and welcomes feedback
    from rulesystem users and designers. Please send
    comments by 23 January. Learn more about the
    Semantic Web Activity. Dated 2008-12-19

9
Where to Get More Information?
  • TBL-1998 TBL Axioms of Web Architecture Rules
    and facts Inference Engines vs. Web. In Design
    issues.
  • RuleML Homesite The Rule Markup Initiative
    http//www.ruleML.org/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com