Recognizing Common Research Study RecordKeeping Mistakes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Recognizing Common Research Study RecordKeeping Mistakes

Description:

Subsequently, Weill Cornell Medical College (WCMC) requirements ... the eye exam portion of the study as she did not want to remove her makeup') THE MEDICAL RECORD ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: jar151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Recognizing Common Research Study RecordKeeping Mistakes


1
Recognizing Common Research Study Record-Keeping
Mistakes
  • Jessica A. Randall, MA
  • IRB Compliance Manager
  • Weill Cornell Medical College

2
Why record keeping? Why Documentation?Why me?
  • Federal Regulations Requirement FDA, OHRP, HHS
  • Subsequently, Weill Cornell Medical College
    (WCMC) requirements
  • FDA Common Rule 1 If its not written downit
    didnt happen.
  • Change in Staff Always be in the know
  • (i.e. subject follow-up, patient safety issues)
  • Audits (internal or external)

3
Department of Health Human Services (HHS) on
Documentation
  • Code of Federal Regulations excerpt title 46
    Human Subject Protection says An institution, or
    when appropriate an IRB, shall prepare and
    maintain adequate documentation of IRB
    activities, including the following
  • Copies of all research proposals reviewed,
    scientific evaluations, if any, that accompany
    the proposals, approved sample consent documents,
    progress reports submitted by investigators, and
    reports of injuries to subjects.
  • Records of continuing review activities.
  • Copies of all correspondence between the IRB and
    the investigators.
  • Statements of significant new findings provided
    to subjects, as required by 46.116(b)(5).
  • (a) The records required by this policy shall be
    retained for at least 3 years, and records
    relating to research which is conducted shall be
    retained for at least 3 years after completion of
    the research. All records shall be accessible for
    inspection and copying by authorized
    representatives of the department or agency at
    reasonable times and in a reasonable manner.

4
objective
  • Learn ways to think more critically about the
    protocols you work on.
  • Take in the bigger picture of what is actually
    going on versus what the consent form and
    protocol say is going on.
  • When you look at the study always put yourself in
    the position of a new subject on the receiving
    end of all of this paperwork (advertisements,
    the consent form, the HIPAA Authorization form).
    It will really open your eyes.

5
Subject Research Record/examples of Source
Documentation
  • Name
  • Address
  • Phone number
  • E-mail
  • When consent HIPAA Authorization were obtained
    and that the subject was given a copy of each (or
    refused)
  • Dates times
  • Tests completed
  • Follow-up
  • The experience
  • Questions the subject asked/was concerned about
  • Anything else of note (i.e. Subject did not
    complete the eye exam portion of the study as she
    did not want to remove her makeup)

6
The Medical record (paper electronic)
  • REMEMBER
  • The Research Record and the Medical Record
    are 2 different things (but there are gray
    areas!)
  • Remember once a consent form or a research study
    document goes into the medical record (paper or
    electronic) anyone who accesses the file can see
    it. Pay attention to what is written in the
    confidentiality section of the consent. (Thats
    why it is call the informed consent)
  • i.e. If the consent form states No one other
    than the PI and his research team will have
    access to information related to your
    participation in the study, then research
    documents should not go into the medical record.

7
Sample Research Study Monitoring Plan(hand out)
8
Consent form documentation Reminder
  • The person obtaining consent must be the person
    signing off on the consent form.
  • Only individuals listed as Co-Investigators or
    Principal Investigator on the IRB protocol can
    obtain consent from subjects.
  • Incorrect A coordinator (who not listed on the
    protocol) goes through the consent form with a
    subject and the PI signs off at a later time.

9
Advertisement issues (flier) Research
opportunity! Exercise
10
Advertisement issues
  • Clip art (dollar sign eyes) not appropriate
  • Research Opportunity should be Research Study
  • Where are adults when age range is 4-17 y/o?
  • Research should always be research study
  • Volunteer for biking, running or walking!
  • No study goal. What is the purpose of doing
    this?
  • Every 4 months for 6 months not possible
  • Patient this is a study- use participant or
    subject
  • Subjects are compensated not paid
  • No contact name, title or location given
  • Human Subject Recruitment Guidelines handout

11
Contact Information
  • Jessica Randall, MA
  • Compliance Manager
  • Institutional Review Board
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
  • 212-821-0672
  • jar2023_at_med.cornell.edu
  • BOX 5, A-131
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com