Financing sustainable human development: preliminary, random, and provocative reflections - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Financing sustainable human development: preliminary, random, and provocative reflections

Description:

Ideology: Austerity fixation - the triumph of neoclassical economics in the 1980s ... declared choice for fiscal austerity. But just now: 'stupid' Maastricht criteria: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: UND17
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Financing sustainable human development: preliminary, random, and provocative reflections


1
Financing sustainable human development
preliminary, random, and provocative reflections
  • Gabriele Köhler
  • Stockholm School of Economics
  • Riga, 21 October 2002

2
The scene
  • All Governments and agencies are rallying around
    sustainable human development (SHD) and the
    Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)

3
The dilemma
  • My contention somewhat exaggerated, so as to
    overcome complacency
  • We have a post-modern, agnostic,
    non-committal consensus
  • In truth, we are skirting the issue - how to
    finance these goals?
  • There are competing demands that require painful
    choices
  • within the status quo there are limited means.

4
The obvious financing needs
  • Income poverty and inequality
  • Public expenditure needs in each country
  • Global public goods

5
For examplePersonal income inequality
Source UNDP, Human Development Report 2002
6
Public spending needs
  • Economic infrastructure prerequisite to economic
    development/growth.
  • Transport and communications (in the IT sense)
  • High tech and pioneer RD
  • Industrial parks incubators
  • Social infrastructure
  • Education for all levels of skills for lifelong
    learning
  • Health as a human right and as a prerequisite to
    productivity

7
And now The millennium challenge
  • Sustainable human development (SHD)
  • a notion championed by UNDP in its
  • Human Development Reports
  • Operationalised in 2000 as the millennium
    development goals (MDGs)

8
The Millennium development movement
  • MDGs now accepted
  • First by Summit of World Leaders
  • UN General Assembly 2002
  • Adapted by agencies
  • UN
  • UNDP. UNDP as lead agency for this.
  • Since Monterrey Conference on Financing for
    Development and 2002 Development Committee
  • Accepted by IFI as well as by business

9
THE 8 UN MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS
  • Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
  • Achieve universal primary education
  • Promote gender equality and empower women
  • Reduce child mortality
  • Improve maternal health
  • Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases
  • Ensure environmental sustainability
  • Develop a global partnership for development

10
The costs of meeting the MDGs
  • Minimum Estimates range between US 40-60
    billion a year in additional aid (World Bank,
    UNESCO, World Health Organization)
  • Some estimates go up to US 100 billion per
    year- this is less than 1 of the global annual
    income but double current ODA flows
  • Cost estimates depend in part on the efficacy of
    countries domestic policies

11
  Rough estimates of additional aid finance
requiredUS billion annuallyminimum estimates
by issues
  •   Halving poverty and hunger......................
    ....................................20
  • Halving population without access to safe
    drinking water.............0
  • Achieving universal primary education...........
    ..............................9
  • Achieving gender equality in primary
    education...........................3
  • Achieving three-fourths decline in maternal
    mortality...................n/a
  • Achieving two-thirds decline in under-five
    mortality......................n/a
  • Halting and reversing HIV/AIDS..................
    .................................7-10
  • Providing special assistance to AIDS
    orphans.............................n/a
  • Improving lives of 100 million slum dwellers
    ................................4
  • Total cost
    50
  • Source Zedillo Report, Financing for Development
    Summit, Monterrey, 2002
  • n/a indicates no estimate available and  the
    total includes allowance for these headings  

12
An excursion financing development - historys
see-saw
  • Bretton Woods Institutions and UN in 1944/5
  • halfhearted attention to social expenditure
  • 1st UN development decade (1960s) recognition
    of the urgency of promoting capital flows to
    developing countries
  • 1974 New international economic order
    acknowledgement of need for global redistribution
  • Structural adjustment policies of the World Bank
    in the 1980s no attention to social impact

13
The changing discourse on financing development
the see-saw again
  • UNICEFs critique of World Bank/IMF structural
    adjustment policies (late 1980s)
  • UNDP Human Development Reports (since 1990) need
    to monitor human - social - progress
  • 20/20 decisions of the World Social Summit
    1995
  • 20 of ODA and 20 of domestic government
    budget for
  • social expenditure
  • The aim of the Summit was to move beyond a
    conversation solely about aid and development
    cooperation toward a broader discourse rooted in
    the recognition that poverty, unemployment, and
    social integration are shared challenges for rich
    and poor countries alike.
  • Juan Somavia, spiritus rector of the Social
    Summit

14
And the see-saw againReal world constraints in
the 1990s
  • Real economy fear the twin deficit pandemic
  • Ideology Austerity fixation - the triumph of
    neoclassical economics in the 1980s
  • Real politics I pressure from the international
    lending agencies for poor countries to be prudent
  • Real politics II rich countries facing economic
    decline resistance to ODA tax resistance
  • Real politics III Maastricht criteria on EC
    members budget deficit ceilings (max 3 of
    GDP)

declared choice for fiscal austerity
15
But just now stupid Maastricht criteriathe
see-saw again?
  • Romano Prodi, president of the European
    Commission, has remarked that the economic rules
    underpinning Europe's single currency the
    Maastricht criteria -  are "stupid".
  • His arguments are
  • the pact should be applied intelligently
  • it should take account of the economic realities
    of our economies
  • rigidities are stupid.
  • (based on Financial Times 18 and 19/20 Oct 2002)

16
(No Transcript)
17
What are the options?
  • At the level of individual countries and
  • Internationally

18
Finding resources in the government budget the
options
  • raising revenues
  • improving efficiency of the expenditure without
    changing its composition
  • shifting spending from military and other
    non-productive areas to social expenditure
  • deficit spending
  • shifting the financial burden to the future
  • AND stimulating demand, hence raising future
    revenue

19
Government Commitments to Human Development, some
examples
20
Finding resources in the macro-economy and
internationally the options
  • Increasing trade revenues
  • Foreign direct investment (FDI)
  • Official development assistance (ODA)
  • Domestic and external loans

21
UNDP, Human Development Report 2002
22
??? ??????? Some tactics
  • Instrumentalising the MDGs to pressurise
    governments and donors
  • Mobilise pressure groups
  • Mobilise business
  • Find creative sources of finance
  • Change public discourse and blinkered thinking

23
Creative solutions one idea
  • Creating a new international tax base? For
    example Tobin Tax on currency trade or capital
    movements, airfares, gasoline
  • Tax of 0.1 capital gains would result in an
    estimated 100 - 300 billion of additional
    yearly revenue

24
Outlook
  • The UN must help define a consensus in the social
    field
  • that investment in people is not a cost to
    society but one of its most remunerative
    investments
  • that equity and social justice do not hamper
    growth but stimulate it that equality of
    opportunity is a human right and not a concession
    to be dispensed by the powerful and
  • that the state and the market are both essential
    to address social needs.
  • Juan Somavia, ILO
  •  
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com