Applying Trials and Systematic Reviews to Individual Patients - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Applying Trials and Systematic Reviews to Individual Patients

Description:

The problem: The 'Leaks' between research & practice. Aware Accept ... Has gingivitis and frequent caries. Trials in young healthy folk showing improvements in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: paulg195
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Applying Trials and Systematic Reviews to Individual Patients


1
Applying Trials and Systematic Reviews to
Individual Patients
  • Paul Glasziou
  • Centre for Evidence Based Medicine
  • University of Oxford

2
Overview
  • Why is applicability a problem?
  • What are the issues?
  • How can we improve?
  • The 5-step process
  • Check on the transferability
  • Application to an individual

www.sph.uq.edu.au/CGP/training/CochraneMethodsGrou
p.html
3
The problem The Leaks between research
practice
Aware Accept Target Doable Recall Agree
Done
Valid Research
4
Variation in Guidelines of AF patients
needing warfarin
Thomson R BMJ 1998316509-13
5
The problem of applying trial results
6
Should Mr RM buy an electric toothbrush?
  • 72 year old pensioner with Parkinsons Disease
  • Has gingivitis and frequent caries
  • Trials in young healthy folk showing improvements
    in gingivitis scores but not caries.
  • Would the electric brush work for him?
  • What should he do?

7
What did you think?
8
Osteoarthritis N-of-1s
  • Comparison of
  • 1,000mg paracetamol tds
  • 400mg ibuprofen tds
  • Two weeks x 6
  • Outcome diary of pain and stiffness of target
    joint

Paracetamol
NSAID
Pair 1
NSAID
Paracetamol
Pair 2
NSAID
Paracetamol
Pair 3
9
N-of-1 overall examples
NSAID responder
NSAID non-responder
10
Interventions Levels of Evidence
  • N-of-1 Trial
  • Systematic review of randomised trials
  • A single randomised trial
  • Controlled, non-randomised
  • Parallel control
  • Historical control
  • Case-control
  • Case-series

Guyatt, JAMA, 2000
11
When n-of-1 not possibleThe benefit-harm model
(Lubsen, Tijssen)
  • When does benefit outweigh harm?
  • Assumptions
  • Benefit (rate difference) proportional to event
    rate
  • Harm constant over event rate
  • Net benefit benefit - harm

Controlled Clinical Trials 10 151S-160S.
12
Transferability and applicability of results
  • TRANSFERABILITY (across groups)
  • What are the benefits and harms?
  • Is there predictable variation in the effects?
  • How does effect vary with predicted risk?
  • APPLICATION (to individual)
  • What are the predicted absolute risk reductions
    for individuals?
  • Do the benefits outweigh the harms?

13
Questions so far?
14
(No Transcript)
15
1. What are the benefits and harms?
  • List all important outcomes
  • beneficial and harmful
  • Get best estimate (from meta-analysis)
  • Summarise in a clinical balance sheet

16
Antibiotics for Acute Otitis Media
  • For Pain(at 2-7 days)RRR 28

17
Clinical Balance Sheet
18
All or some responders?
I. Everyone gets small benefit?
19
OK Earache Diarrhoea
20
2. Are there predictable variations in the
effects?
  • Does effect vary by (PICO)
  • Patient features, e.g., comorbidity or disease
    features, e.g., stage
  • Intervention features e.g., dose/intensity/timing?
  • Comparator, e.g., placebo, add-on, or active
  • Outcome measures, e.g., reliability, duration
  • But beware of artefactual causes
  • Differences in followup, compliance, measures ,

21
Effect Modifiers for AOM
  • P impact greater if fever, vomiting?
  • Data from 1 trial (Little)
  • I no difference between antibiotics
  • O outcome for pain varies with time
  • No impact in 24 hours

22
Subgroup Analysis
Does statin work in those with a stroke history
(Hx)?
(Circulation. 2001103387-392.)
23
3. How does effect vary with predicted risk?
  • Is Relative Risk constant across low to high risk
    groups?
  • Relative Risk is most often constant
  • Need to check using
  • Plots
  • Heterogeneity statistics

24
Impact of changing risk
25
Rate versus rate plots
LAbbe plot of trials of Warfarin in Atrial
Fibrillation
Treatment group rate
Control group rate
26
Which risk measure is most constant?
Analysis of the effect of control rate in 115
meta-analysis Schmid et al Stats in Med 1998
1923-42.
27
Possible approaches to applying reviews and trials
  • Inclusion/exclusion criteria
  • For reviews overlap or combination?
  • Subgroup analysis
  • Appropriate methods needed
  • Cross-design synthesis
  • Combining RCT and database evidence
  • 5-Steps of Transferability/Applicability
  • Benefits versus harms predicted risk
  • Glasziou, Irwig BMJ 1995
  • OConnell, Glasziou, Hill. NHMRC How to use the
    evidence

28
Clinical Balance sheet From trial to Individual
Trial Balance Sheet
Stability and modifiers Of effects across
groups (steps 2 and 3)
Individual features And risk values (step 4 5)
Individual Balance Sheet
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com