Title: 19391940: European unification
11939-1940 European unification?
- Basic dilemmas of European cooperation are set
way before World War II - The preeminence of the nation-state, and the lack
of confidence or of a vision of mutual interests
strong enough to force cooperation - Europe not yet bashed hard enough?
- The geographical and intellectual limits are
unclear - The ambiguity between a European utopia and the
realities of economic and political tensions - 1939-1940 Invasion of Poland, battle fo France
- In the chaos of 1940, a surprising integration
project between France and Britain - June 10th, 1940 French government leaves Paris.
Jean Monnet is at the head of the Franco-British
supply committee in London. He proposed (13-14)
to Churchill, who endorsed it, a project of
Franco-British union. - The project is forgotten when France is occupied
- An ad hoc project, linked with the circumstances
of the war
2. 1940-1942 Germany dominant . An improvised
project mixing intense economic exploitation,
political submission, and propaganda in favor of
a German-led unified Europe. A project directed
at the populations of occupied regions of
Europe . Hopes in Vichy France that France could
find a place in this New Order Montoire,
October 1940 1942 Vichy France occupied
3Europeist projects in the Resistance
- The European resistance to fascism as a
background to 1945-1949 - The spirit of the Resistance in France
- The fight against authoritarian regimes as a
common ground between heterogeneous movements - Christian-democrats, socialists, communists,
liberals, conservatives - Different things were emphasized
- A crisis of capitalism, liberal democracy, and
the nation? - Ideas for the peace federalist projects,
economic planification and rationalization,
neo-corporatism - Themes
- Unify Europe
- Transcend the nation-states
- Gather the European peoples that united in
resistance to autocracy - The after-war seen as a window of opportunity
- The communist resistance movements remain outside
this intellectual production - The influence of the USSR
4Symbolic texts
- Antiero Spinelli and the Ventotene Manifesto
(1941) - A non-communist socialist jailed by Mussolini in
1928, then again in 1941 on the Ventotene island - A blueprint for a federal, unified Europe
Towards a free and united Europe - a draft
manifesto
- The Manifesto of the European resistance, Geneva,
20th May 1944 - Federal Europe as a guarantee for peace
- A léchelle humaine, Léon Blum, 1941/1945
- Socialist leader, non-communist Left
- Universal project, not specifically European
- Lettres dun Européen, Maurice Druon, 1943/1945
- After the war, will these thoughts matter?
- No
5Challenges in 1944-1945
- . Economic challenges
- . Political challenges
- The Cold War, Germany
- On March 5, 1946, Winston Churchill, while at
Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri, gave his
speech "The Sinews of Peace," declaring that an
iron curtain" had descended across Europe - France as a battlefield for these new tensions
6France in 1944-1945
- June-September 1944 Landing in Normandy, the
liberation of Paris. November, Allied troops in
Strasbourg - France a field of ruins
- War, occupation, poverty
- Trade, finances disrupted
- 1949 Britain, France and other European
countries were forced to devaluate their
currencies by 20-25 - Around 600 000 deaths (on 40-60 m deaths)
- The political, social, ideological divisions
World War II as a civil war in France? - French foreign policy in disarray
- What is France after 1945?
- Maurice Vaisse Power or influence?
- What is Frances German policy? Russian policy?
Policy towards Britain? Policy towards the United
States? - The colonies?
- Setif massacres in 1945
7Domestic problems
- The difficult reconstitution of a domestic
political scene - Conservative right and non-communist left
discredited - Weakness in front of Hitler Weakness in front
of the extreme right Attraction towards the
USSR - The right especially discredited by the contacts
of many of its leaders with the Pétain regime - The conservative Right in purgatory, 1945-1955
- The emergence of a Christian-Democrat party to
babysit rightist voters the Mouvement
Républicain Populaire - A misunderstanding conservative voters, liberal,
europeist elite - Le parti des fusillés a towering, strong
Communist Party balancing between Revolution,
loyalty to the USSR, and participation - Gaullisme an ideological melting pot, kept
together by the memories of the Resistance and
the attachment to the personality of de Gaulle - Mika Waltari, 1948 (Lähdin Istanbuliin) I felt
like France was about to be crushed between two
masses - Gaullism and the Communists
- The threat of civil unrest, cleansing after the
occupation, tensions fuelled by restrictions
8The Gaullist narrative, 1944-1948
- Charles de Gaulle
- and Free France, 1940-1944
- A creed in 1945
- France as an Allied nation
- France did not lose the war
- Germany needs to be divided
- A multipolar world
- Semi-planified economy and a defiance towards
- the intrigues of Parliamentarism
- Nations and states
- A personality and a party
- The towering figure of French politics
- The party of loyalty to de Gaulle the
Rassemblement du Peuple Francais, April 1947 - A narrative on France and the French
- The resistant France
- France and its rank
- A denial of reality?
9Constitutional reorganization
- France disorganized in 1945
- A provisional government under de Gaulle
- De Gaulle eases the transition by imposing the
narrative of resistant France - The Communists, after a few hesitations in
June-December 1944, opt out of revolution - The USSR wants to concentrate on the race to
Berlin - Continue with the Third Republic?
- For de Gaulle, an unconditional no
- The spirit of the Resistance breaks up very
quickly, political forces reappear and with them
a will to reorganize the system through familiar
methods - 1945 a referendum is organized
- No to the Third Republic
- Yes to a Consultative Assembly to draft a new
regime - A first referendum in May 1946, the project is
rejected - October 13th 1946, a compromise constitution is
adopted through referendum - Strong Parliament, weak president, strong Prime
Minister - Inacceptable for de Gaulle, who resigned already
in January 1946
101946-1950, Tripartisme and Third Force
- After the departure of de Gaulle, and until his
return in 1958, the Fourth Republic - 1946-1950, political instability, then
stabilization - From tripartisme (Communists, Christian-democrats,
Socialists, 1946-1947) to the Third Force (after
1947 Socialists, Christian-Democrats, liberals)
against both Gaullism and the Communists - Examples of Prime Ministers
- Paul Ramadier, Robert Schuman, Georges Bidault,
René Pleven, Pierre Pflimlin - All names associated with the idea of a unified
Europe
11European unity?
- At the head of the state, the Prime Ministers and
the Parliament parties - Christian-Democrats, Socialists
- A vision of the world and Europe
- Influence of Resistance ideology and federalist
ideals - Yet a strongly traditional view of the European
situation - Not only have the (europeist) networks been
unable to silence national realities, they have
also been unable to mobilize the peoples into
endorsing their objectives (Max Gallo, 1989)? - One could add they very quickly readapted to
national realities - Three things are emphasized intergovernmental
cooperation in Europe (not federation) the
curbing of Germany (how? To what extent?) the
alliance with Great-Britain - The alliance as the basic policy of France,
defended especially in the Foreign Ministry by an
old guard of diplomats, René Massigli for
example, who will oppose the turn in 1950 to the
Community method - First diplomatic contacts with the British
nanny in 1945-1946
12- This also corresponds with a general European
feeling - When the Allies win the war, none of the winners
intend to reorganize Europe along the lines drawn
by the resistance - Winston Churchill seems to be the only one
interested in Europeist projects, out of
anti-communism mostly - A confederation, under British leadership, able
to defend itself against communism - Churchill voted out of power in July 1945
- He will defend European projects in private
circles - 19 September 1946, the Zurich Speech
- Over wide areas a vast quivering mass of
tormented, hungry, care-worn and bewildered human
beings gape at the ruins of their cities and
their homes, and scan the dark horizons for the
approach of some new peril, tyranny or terror
That is all that Europeans, grouped in so many
ancient states and nations have got by tearing
each other to pieces and spreading havoc far and
wide. Yet all the while there is a remedyIt is
to recreate the European family, or as much of it
as we can, and to provide it with a structure
under which it can dwell in peace, in safety and
in freedom. We must build a kind of United States
of Europe.
131947, initiative in Washington
- 1947
- Eastern Europe is under the yoke, tensions rise
with the Soviet Union, strikes and unrest
threatens in Western Europe as well - France the Renault strike, May 1947
- European situation appears as bad as in 1945,
despite American help in loans and goods - The Americans had thought that Great-Britain and
France would rebuild Europe - Beginning of the year 1947, William Clayton,
assistant secretary of state for economic
affairs, reported to Washington that "millions of
people are slowly starving" in Germany - Worries increase also among the American military
- March 1947, the conference of Moscow fails to
deal with the status of Germany, and the
divisions appear clearly - Early 1947, Great-Britain withdraws from Greece
it will not act as a stabilizer in Europe - March 12th 1947 President Harry Truman speaks to
the Congress of a policy of containment - We must take immediate and resolute action in
Greece and Turkey
14Marshall speech, June 5th, 1947
- The US shift from world-wide plans to European
reconstruction. Emphasis on European projects - A strong Western Germany involved in Europe-wide
cooperations - Already outlined in a speech by the Secretary of
state William Byrnes in Stuttgart, September 6th
1946 to give back to Germany its place among
free nations - June 5th 1947, informal speech by secretary of
state George Marshall, at the university of
Harvard - Experience of the conference in Moscow no hope
for cooperation with the Soviets - Help economically European countries to recover
- A political plan the arm of containment
- An economic plan Get rid of surpluses, create
markets, break protectionism and barriers to
trade (Intra-European trade and payments
recovery was seen in Washington as the means of
achieving the long-term strategic goal of
worldwide trade liberalization and
convertibility, Wendy Asbeek Brusse)
15- France and Great-Britain had been informed
beforehand - Ernest Bevin, British PM June 13th, reacts to
the speech and says a new organization should be
built on a Franco-British axis - Reactions in France
- Communists immediately against
- George Bidault, French PM, Christian-democrat,
and Socialist governments follow Great-Britain in
the hope of getting support for a division and
occupation of Germany - Treaty of Dunkirk with Great-Britain in March
1947 traditional alliance treaty - American proposal as something new
- Bidault is not a Europeist at heart, but he
accepts Marshalls proposal - The Americans want to rebuild Germany, Bidault
wants to control that - France would have a strong role in a European
organization and would be able to support its
German policy - France needs the economic help
16(No Transcript)
17The European Recovery Program and the OEEC
- Bidault and Bevin meet in Paris and decide to
accept the US proposal - The USSR denounces the plan, Eastern Europe
withdraws - French Communist Party in fierce opposition to
European schemes - 16 countries meet in Paris on July 1st-3rd 1947
- A series of committees to report to the US on
European situation - The report is ready in September
- April 16th 1948 second conference in Paris,
creation of the Organization for European
Economic Cooperation 17 countries, including the
Allied zones of Germany - January 1949 the COMECON is created as a
response - OEEC the first Western European organization
- The planification and concerted implementation
of a plan of European recovery with the US aid - An agenda at odds with the protectionism and
Malthusianism of European economics before the
war economic growth, development of capacity of
production, monetary stabilization, employment,
etc - A agenda that will only partially be carried out
opposition