National Clinical Audit

1
National Clinical Audit Patients Outcomes
ProgrammeDick Waite
2
About this presentation

• the Programme that we have inherited
• strategic questions
• short-term priorities
• programme review
• improvement

3
The National Programme 05/06
Funded by BHF
4
The National Programme cont.
5
Strategic questions

• how large should the National Programme be?
• what topics should be covered?
• how should they be funded?
• do projects provide good VFM?
• should participation be mandatory?
• how does the National Programme link with other
  initiatives and funding sources?
• how can we best promote improvements for patients?

6
Short-term priorities

• ongoing projects success
• internal staffing and management

7
Short-term priorities

• ongoing projects success
• internal staffing and management
• consulting on strategic plan
• links with local Clinical Audit Development
  Director (Graham Copeland)

8
Short-term priorities

• ongoing projects success
• internal staffing and management
• consulting on strategic plan
• links with local Clinical Audit Development
  Director (Graham Copeland)
• programme review
• identifying priorities for funding
• ensuring VFM
• using findings in assessment

9
Programme review

• variable inheritance programme review first
  half of 2005/06

10
Programme review

• variable inheritance programme review first
  half of 2005/06
• contracts with agreed end points
• timetable and listed deliverables against which
  we can monitor progress

11
Programme review

• variable inheritance programme review first
  half of 2005/06
• contracts with agreed end points
• timetable and listed deliverables against which
  we can monitor progress
• participation incentives (the benefits to local
  bodies of participating in national projects
  should exceed the costs that they incur taking
  part)

12
Assessment for Improvement

• high quality, clinician-led, patient-based
  information systems are centre stage

13
Assessment for Improvement

• high quality, clinician-led, patient-based
  information systems are centre stage
• used to corroborate local bodies
  self-assessments against standards
• National Clinical Audit and Patients Outcomes
  Programme is a prime source of such information

14
Assessment for Improvement

• high quality, clinician-led, patient-based
  information systems are centre stage
• used to corroborate local bodies
  self-assessments against standards
• National Clinical Audit and Patients Outcomes
  Programme is a prime source of such information
• no inherited automatic right to use National
  Programme findings in assessment - consultation

15
Annual health check
16
Annual health check
17
Annual health check
Healthcare Commission corroboration
Multiple data sources, including CAPO
18
Annual health check

• Under-standing
• reflection
• peer review
• sharing ideas

Healthcare Commission corroboration
Multiple data sources, including CAPO
19
Annual health check

• Change
• plans
• invest
• re-configure
• train

• Under-standing
• reflection
• peer review
• sharing ideas

Healthcare Commission corroboration
Multiple data sources, including CAPO
20
Annual health check

• Monitor
• re-audit
• Local Presence

• Change
• plans
• invest
• re-configure
• train

• Under-standing
• reflection
• peer review
• sharing ideas

Healthcare Commission corroboration
Multiple data sources, including CAPO
21
Project stages
Varies a lot
Can we get here in 2 years?
22
(No Transcript)