Building Capacity in RE Sector - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Building Capacity in RE Sector

Description:

South Asia Conference on Renewable Energy 2006. 2 ... it possible to integrate small RE power plants into the system despatch schedule? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: vinayd4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Building Capacity in RE Sector


1
Building Capacity in RE Sector
  • 19th-Apr-2006
  • South Asia Conference on Renewable Energy 2006

2
Structure for the discussion
  • Rationale for building capacity
  • Potential and factors impacting Renewable Energy
  • Framework for promoting RE
  • Renewable Purchase Standards
  • Pricing Issues
  • Technical issues
  • CDM and other issues
  • Way forward and challenges

3
Rationale for building capacity through renewable
Electricity for all
Environmental benefits
Energy Security
  • Both On Off Grid options
  • Diverse presence throughout the country
  • Promote local Industries Generate rural
    employment
  • Household electrification by 2012
  • 80.3 of villages electrified and 43.52 of
    households electrified
  • 7.28 crore households need to be electrified
  • RE offers opportunities to reduce dependency on
    oil, coal, and gas
  • Resources available within the country thereby
    no externalities with respect to Access,
    Availability cost
  • To achieve self-sufficiency for energy
    requirement
  • Natural resources (including Coal) to deplete by
    2050
  • Addresses the threats associated with global
    warming
  • The cost of pollutants is not charged to the
    conventional generator
  • International Energy Prices (UK) Emission costs
    turn out to be 6.7 to 14.7 of electricity
    price.
  • World Bank study- Avoided cost for local
    emissions natural resource accounting to a tune
    of 50 paise/kWh

To meet energy gaps/targets through self
sufficiency and environmental protection
4
Evolution of Renewable Energy-Internationally
  • Last two decades of learning has shown that
    penetration of renewables is
  • Dependant on the public policy framework
    regulations
  • Dependant on the market models evolved by various
    stakeholders
  • Dependant on the technology robustness
  • Various governments have implemented incentive
    schemes to stimulate the market to achieve these
    targets
  • Feed-in tariffs
  • Simplistic, transparent, popular most
    successful
  • Fiscal incentives and investment subsidies
  • Market based mechanism through certificates,
    quota, higher returns and reducing technology
    cost
  • Many governments through public policy have fixed
    targets/goals
  • EU 12 by 2010
  • India 10 by 2012
  • China 10 by 2020

5
Potential and status India
  • Wind energy
  • Well matured industry among the RE sector
  • Estimated Gross and Technical potential are
    45,000 MW and 13,390 MW respectively
  • 8 states have more than 1,000 MW gross potential
  • Installed capacity as on Sep06 is 4,228 MW
  • Small Hydro
  • Estimated potential in India is 15,000 MW
  • 4,026 sites mapped across the country till now
  • Installed capacity as on Dec04 is 2,184 MW
  • Biomass Cogen
  • Estimated potential of 3500 MW
  • Potential exists in sugar producing states (UP,
    Mah)
  • Installed capacity of 574 MW
  • Biomass power
  • Estimated potential of 16,500 MW
  • Potential existing across the states
  • Installed capacity of 760 MW (as on Dec 04)
  • Waste to energy
  • Estimated potential of 6928 MW
  • High potential existing in the country as a
    result of rapid urbanization
  • Installed capacity of 151 MW
  • Solar photovoltaic
  • Potential in India is 20 MW/Km2
  • Potential of solar PV generation is among all the
    states of the country
  • Installed capacity of 191 MW

Huge potential still untapped
6
Factors impacting RE projects- India
  • Regulatory framework
  • Regulatory Purchase Standards (RPS)
  • Tariff for RE projects
  • Wheeling charges and loss allocation
  • Policy framework
  • 80 accelerated depreciation
  • Section 80 IA benefits under IT Act
  • Electricity Act, Electricity Policy and NTP
  • Subsidy for rural electrification
  • Infrastructural and other factors
  • Grid connectivity/strengthening
  • Intermittency issue (Wind)
  • CDM framework
  • Carbon credits under the Kyoto Protocol
  • Sharing mechanism

7
Enabling framework
8
Provision for renewables under EA 2003- RPS
  • EA 2003 provides a special place for renewables
    under Sec. 86(i)e
  • Mandatory for all SERCs to fix a minimum
    percentage of procurement by distribution
    companies
  • Several SERCs have fixed the quantum for
    renewables and tariffs for renewable energy
    projects as under
  • Possible factors for determination of
    trajectory/quota
  • Total potential for renewable energy generation
  • Quantum of renewable energy being already
    generated
  • Tariff for renewable energy
  • Projecting energy requirement
  • Impact on the overall power purchase cost of the
    Discoms

Methodology for determination of RPS Different
approach followed by different States
9
Provision for renewables under EA 2003- RPS
  • Factors/issues under consideration
  • Common approach/methodology?
  • Review of targets according to requirement and
    potential
  • One percentage or Minimum and maximum percentages
    to be defined
  • Whether DISCOMs/State should be free to procure
    RE power from other DISCOMs/State in case of
    non-availability of RE sources within their own
    distribution area/State
  • Should off-grid RETs be included in the RPS?

10
Tariff- Philosophy behind tariff determination
for RE projects
  • Cost plus method Section 62 of the EA Act
  • Simplistic and most widely accepted
  • Most of the SERCs relied on Cost-plus method
  • SERCs invited petitions for Capex, Opex,
    Performance Financial benchmarks
  • NTP mandates CERC to issue tariff guidelines for
    RE projects
  • Avoided cost method
  • Links the tariff with highest cost of generation
  • Competitive bidding
  • Section 63 Tariff based on competitive bidding
  • NTP also foresees that over the period tariff for
    RE should be based on competitive bidding
  • Factors/issues under consideration
  • Could avoided environmental cost be included
    while determination of tariff guidelines (may be
    through higher returns)?
  • Is it premature to introduce competitive bidding
    for fresh capacity addition in RE projects?
  • Different approaches adopted by different States

11
Technical Issues
  • Scheduling and ABT issues
  • Daya-head advance scheduling is not possible
  • Nature of demand and supply unknown in case of
    wind generation
  • The utility cannot take the capacity availability
    from such plants into consideration
  • RE projects could be excluded from ABT and
    banking can continue
  • RERC recently allowed banking and exempted RE
    projects from ABT
  • Is it possible to integrate small RE power plants
    into the system despatch schedule?
  • Infrastructural issues Grid strengthening
  • Who (the developer or power purchaser or the
    transmission/distribution company) should bear
    the cost of evacuation facility up to the nearest
    receiving sub-station?
  • What should be the approach for deciding the
    technical parameters of interconnection (e.g.
    Voltage level, number of circuits,
    interconnection point, etc)?
  • Determination of wheeling and other charges
  • Accounting and quantification of TD losses while
    determining wheeling charges

12
Clean Development Mechanism
  • CDM benefits for GHG reduction
  • RE projects could get credit for the emission
    reduction through the flexibility mechanisms as
    per the Kyoto Protocol
  • Additionality clause would be critical to address
  • Critical factors
  • Modalities and procedure still evolving
  • Some uncertainty whether the CDM benefits should
    be taken in to consideration while deciding the
    tariff (or using these for financing the
    renewable projects)
  • Since, the emissions reductions would give
    additional revenue to the project
  • However, this revenue would not be uniform across
    all the projects, as CDM is a project-based
    activity, and the baseline and emission
    reductions vary from project to project
  • From the point of view of criteria of
    additionality, all renewable projects may not
    qualify as CDM projects.
  • Need for regulatory clarity as regards CDM
    revenues

13
Other Issues- Off-grid options
  • Innovative decentralised and off-grid models for
    achieving rural electrification targets (RGGV
    Yojna)
  • Pricing/economics of off-grid supply Differs
    with size, technology and load factor
  • Clubbing of villages- Cluster approach
  • Combined generation and distribution schemes
    Option of selling surplus through Grid
    connectivity
  • Estimation of subsidy and institutional mechanism
  • Capacity to pay and estimation of subsidy
  • Monitoring and implementation (performance based
    subsidy)
  • Panchayats or Rural association/cooperatives
  • Financial mechanism Role of banking sector
  • Need to link the banking Sector with subsidy
    delivery mechanisms
  • Need to devise bankable schemes which would cover
    the subsidy scheme too
  • Perhaps also a Guarantee Scheme to cover Bank
    Finance

Role of Regulator in off-grid generation
14
Way forward and challenges
  • RPS regulations could be in place in the next one
    year
  • For achieving the national goal of 10 by 2010 or
    may be more
  • Dynamic and should balance the potential and
    impact on retail tariffs
  • The emerging market model of IPP, would see large
    sized projects specially in case of wind projects
  • CERC guidelines for determination of tariff for
    RE projects
  • Would be critical for building capacity in RE
    sector
  • Exemption from competitive bidding?
  • Clarity regarding technical issues (including
    ABT) and sharing of CDM benefits
  • Achieving RE targets through implementation of
    RVVN yojna in true spirit
  • In case of Off-grid options the role of the
    Regulator requires clarity
  • Challenge is planning, monitoring, financing,
    implementation and institutional issues
    (including in disbursement of subsidy)

15
Thank You
Contact Details Mobile 09820197791 www.crisil.co
m
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com