Cooperative Control of Distributed Autonomous Vehicles in Adversarial Environments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Cooperative Control of Distributed Autonomous Vehicles in Adversarial Environments

Description:

Fault tolerant communication network supporting hierarchical ... Simulation carried out with the assumption of ideality i.e. no jammer and propagation loss. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:183
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Sungs9
Learn more at: http://www.seas.ucla.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cooperative Control of Distributed Autonomous Vehicles in Adversarial Environments


1
Cooperative Control of Distributed Autonomous
Vehicles in Adversarial Environments
  • 2002 MURI Minisymposium
  • Ameesh Pandya
  • Prof. Greg Pottie

2
Overview
  • Fault tolerant communication network supporting
    hierarchical distributed communication network.
  • Robust network algorithm for highly dynamic
    mobile nodes (say, UAVs).
  • Providing minimum communications between mobile
    nodes to minimize the probability of jamming.
  • Working closely with Prof. Speyers group to
    develop the communication model according to
    control traffic.

3
Wireless Communication Model
  • Application Layer
  • Transport layer
  • IP
  • Network
  • Link Layer
  • MAC Layer
  • Radio
  • Channel

4
Our Concentration
  • Application Layer
  • Transport layer
  • IP
  • Network
  • Link Layer
  • MAC Layer
  • Radio
  • Channel

Area of Concentration
5
QoS Constraints for Control Traffic
  • Data Rate for the control traffic 2 Mbps
  • This could be considered as the upper bound.
  • Achieved by using 2 Mbps modem.
  • Latency for control traffic 0 100 ms
  • Worst latency is 100ms for control traffic.

6
Channel Capacity
  • Capacity constraint for the control traffic.
  • Channel capacity in terms of received and
    transmitted power, jamming power, spread factor,
    bit rate.
  • Goal is to know the reliable transmitting
    distance between the nodes at 2Mbps for the given
    parameters.

7
Channel Capacity
  • Assumptions
  • Isotropic antenna
  • Spread spectrum modulation.
  • For Low probability of intercept (LPI), Pr/WsN0
    0.1, where Pr is the received power and Ws is
    the band width of spread spectrum signal.

8
Channel Capacity
  • Shannons Equation
  • where, Pr is the received power, W is the channel
    bandwidth.
  • For isotropic antenna,
  • where Pt is the transmitted power
  • Spread factor, f Ws/R, where Ws is the band
    width of the spread spectrum signal and R is the
    information rate in bps.

9
Channel Capacity
  • If we do not consider broadband jammer, then
  • In presence of broadband jammer capacity becomes
  • where, is the average jamming power at
    distance r from the receiver
  • If we use CDMA, then in presence of jammer for Nu
    simultaneous users, channel capacity is given by
    (assuming identical signal power)

10
Simulation Result
  • Achievable transmitting distance at 2 Mbps for
    different values of transmitting power.
  • Here, the transmitting power is assumed to be 1
    Watt and 2 Watts.
  • Assuming available channel bandwidth to be
    100Mbps.
  • Simulation carried out with the assumption of
    ideality i.e. no jammer and propagation loss.

11
MAC Layer Clustering
  • Considering n nodes (UAVs).
  • Selecting clusters (cluster heads).
  • Each cluster having back bone node.
  • Using optimal cluster algorithm.

12
Future Objectives
  • Developing clustering algorithms for mobile nodes
    in dynamic environment.
  • Clustering algorithms
  • UAV - UAV
  • UAV - UGV
  • Obtaining simulation results on the performance
    and robustness of the algorithm.

13
Insight
  • The solution to the communication network model
    for this particular problem may be very close
    to IPv6.
  • Looking into this possibility.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com