Collaborative Learning: oncampus in a technology based environment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Collaborative Learning: oncampus in a technology based environment

Description:

Rob Kemm, Neil Williams, Helen Kavnoudias, Paul Fritze, Debbi Weaver ... Informality. Discussion. Note-taking. Economical. Collaborative Learning. Aided by Computer ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: robk3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Collaborative Learning: oncampus in a technology based environment


1
Collaborative Learningon-campus in a technology
based environment
Academic Developers Conference 2001
  • Rob Kemm, Neil Williams, Helen Kavnoudias, Paul
    Fritze, Debbi Weaver
  • The University of Melbourne

2
Outline of Talk
  • Collaborative Learning on Campus
  • Complements Anytime, Anywhere
  • but not just now
  • Important for Professional Development
  • Generic skills etc.
  • Course Structure
  • Evaluate or Perish
  • Multiple approaches
  • Modules and Courses

3
Collaborative Learning Environment
  • 3 / group
  • Combining
  • Text Books
  • Informality
  • Discussion
  • Note-taking
  • Economical

4
Collaborative Learning
  • Aided by Computer
  • Access to resources economically on WWW
  • Challenging problems
  • Interactive models and model building
  • Facilitated by humans
  • Tutors for unforseen help group processes
  • Student interplay (peer-learning -teaching)
  • On-campus

5
Semester in 2nd Year Science
6
Science-CAL weekly structure
  • Preparatory open-ended questions
  • Task-Sheets paper-based
  • Problem Task Sheets on Web-delivered and/or
    Stand-alone module on iMac
  • Progress self-assessment with open-ended
    Extension Questions
  • Individual Revision with Learning MCQs (4 of 5
    correct)
  • (Group Project - writing peer processes)

7
Evaluation
  • Formative Summative
  • for all Collaborative Sessions
  • for Individual Modules
  • Iterative cycles
  • Development Evaluation
  • Implementation Evaluation

8
Evaluation Approaches
  • Modifications advised by
  • Graduate-student pre-trials
  • Student Questionnaires
  • Observations Focus groups
  • Computer Audit Trails
  • Tutor Feedback
  • Analyses of Learning Outcomes

9
Analyses of Learning Outcomes
  • Transfer skills
  • Pre- Post-Tests
  • Analysis of Specific Exam Answers
  • Exam correlations for Cohorts
  • with collaborative learning
  • With approaches to learning

10
Web-based Problems (majority of course)
  • Interactive re-useable components

11
OCCA-based Problems (AUC 2000)
  • Record all Student Activities for recall

12
Stand-alone Module (a few in course)
  • Subject to Intensive Evaluation

13
Model Blood Pressure Control
  • Complete connection of neurones

14
Audit Trail Analysis
  • Control of BP Control Version 1.0

15
Model Kidney Cell Function
  • Partially completed task

16
Analysis of pre- post-tests
  • Transfer of Skills not good
  • Learning styles important
  • Trial error, thinking out, guessing etc.
  • Principles involved only implied
  • Revision of principles
  • Introduce module on principles
  • Encourage thinking out solutions

17
CL Influence on 2nd Year Exams
  • Groups from 1st Year Performance

18
Defining New Cohorts for Analysis
  • Performance Changes
  • 1st Year to 2nd Year
  • Improvers gt 8 (1SD)
  • Disappointers lt -8
  • Remainder

19
Multi-Choice vs Collab. Learning
  • No clear distinction

20
Exam Writing vs Collab. Learning
  • Improvers perform much better

21
Multi-Choice vs. Group Project
  • No clear distinction

22
Exam Writing vs Group Project
  • Improvers perform better, threshold?

23
Conclusion
  • Our Collaborative Learning Environment
  • Leads to better learning outcomes
  • High and middle achievers in exams
  • Group Project Skills
  • Used effectively by improvers

24
QA
25
Predictions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com