Does Anybody Know My Name The Need for Relationship PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 29
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Does Anybody Know My Name The Need for Relationship


1
Does Anybody Know My Name? The Need for
Relationship
  • Professor Paula Hixenbaugh
  • FACE Seminar Series
  • 23 October 2007

2
Overview
  • Establish importance of relationship
  • National context
  • Evidence from University of Westminster
  • UK/USA evidence
  • Personal tutoring as key

3
Importance of Relationship to Higher Education
  • Mass higher education
  • Importance of retention
  • Emphasis on the student experience
  • Student wellbeing

4
HEFCE Strategic Plan 2006-2011
  • Students as fee payers are likely to become more
    demanding, and their interest and the quality of
    their learning experience are at the heart of our
    plans

5
National Picture
  • 30,000 UK students fail to get a qualification
    (NAO,2002)
  • HEFCE Strategic Plan 2006-2011
  • We think that a high proportion of students
    completing their courses is an important
    indicator of good quality learning, teaching and
    student support.

6
Survey of the Student Experience University of
Westminster
  • Greater understanding of our students
  • Evidence on support needed by students
  • Identify factors leading to student success and
    student withdrawal
  • A rationale for interventions

7
Questionnaire
  • On-line
  • Demographics
  • Life Style Questions
  • Psychological and Physical health
  • Academic and Social Integration
  • National Student Survey Questions

8
Procedure
  • Given to all first year undergraduate students at
    Westminster in February 2005, 2006 and 2007
  • Response rate approximately 25 each year approx
    3,000
  • Analysis complete for 2005

9
Ethnicity
10
(No Transcript)
11
Considered Dropping-Out
12
Reasons for Considering Abandoning Course
13
Analysis
  • The higher feelings of integration
  • the higher current health ratings.
  • The higher feelings of integration
  • the higher evaluations of social
  • support

14
Summary Quantitative Results
  • Poor mental health, low student satisfaction and
    poor institutional integration were significant
    in predicting whether students considered
    abandoning their course

15
The data allow us to identify possible factors
involved in student attrition (2006)
  • For example, those who seriously considered
    dropping out of their course differ significantly
    from those who did not on almost all measures.
  • Compared to students who did not consider
    dropping out, they report
  • Poorer estimations of physical health (p lt0.001).
  • Poorer health now compared to one year ago (p
    0.008).
  • A poorer sense of well-being (p lt0.001).
  • Significantly lower estimations of social support
    (p lt0.001).
  • Significantly lower sense of integration (p
    lt0.001).
  • Significantly lower levels of satisfaction with
    their course (p lt0.001).
  • Lower levels of education for both their mothers
    (p 0.007) and their fathers (plt0.001).

16
Needs of Low Participation Groups
  • Thomas (2006) has found that students from
    working class backgrounds may lack the confidence
    to approach personal tutors and may benefit from
    a tutoring system which is more proactive,
    structured and prioritises relationships.

17
Integration and Satisfaction
  • Strongest relationship found so far
  • A strong positive correlation between
    satisfaction with course and Institutional and
    Social Integration.

18
Implications
  • If we can increase the degree to which students
    feel integrated, it is very likely to lead to
    greater feelings of satisfaction.
  • Support for the conclusion that greater
    satisfaction leads to high rates of persistence
    on course.

19
Personal Tutoring Key
  • Effective personal tutoring can improve
  • Integration
  • Student satisfaction
  • Student persistence

20
Qualitative Analysis
  • Looking back on the semester, are there any
    particularly positive or negative aspects you
    would like to highlight?
  • Optional question
  • 403 participants filled in positive question
  • 442 participants filled in the negative question

21
Sample Qualitative Analysis
  • Four themes emerge for both positive and negative
    comments
  • Course, staff, student experience, institution
  • Concerns about feedback, want quality teaching
    and more staff contact

22
Personal TutoringPositive
  • I found a great deal of support from my tutor.
    It was reassuring to have one particular person I
    could talk to
  • Developing a good relationship with my personal
    tutor was definitely a good thing

23
Personal TutoringNegative
  • Student - I feel we dont get enough time spent
    with tutors to discuss our work, they always seem
    too busy
  • Staff I like personal tutoring and do think it
    is very important but it is time consuming,
    draining and under-resourced

24
Resources
  • Yorke and Longden (2004)
  • Not just additional resources
  • ..the way in which teachers interact with, and
    support , students is critically important

25
Vincent TintoInnovations in Student Success2006
  • A wide range of studies in a variety of settings
    and for a range of students have confirmed that
    the more frequently students engage with faculty,
    staff, and their peers, the more likely, other
    things being equal, that they will persist and
    graduate. Simply put involvement matters.

26
UK Evidence
  • Retention Team University of Teesside (2005)
  • Lack of support from University staff a key
    factor in deciding to leave
  • Support from staff also a key factor in deciding
    to stay despite difficulties

27
Innovations in Personal TutoringA Growing
Evidence Base
  • Faculty based student support officers (Liz Marr
    and Sheila Aynsley-Smith)
  • Students 1st (Barbara Lee and Alan Robinson)
  • Platoons (Peter Hill)
  • On-line Personal Tutoring (Rosalind Croach and
    Ruth Barrett)

28
Relationship at the heart of the process
  • The concept of relationship includes students
    relationships with staff, with other students and
    with the institution. Personal tutoring has a
    key role to play in the fostering of these
    relationships

29
References
  • HEFCE Strategic Plan 2006-2011 Consultation,
    November 2005/45.
  • http//www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05_45/
    05_45.pdf
  • National Audit Office (2002). Improving student
    achievement in English higher education Report
    by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC486,
    Session 2001-2002 18 January 2002
  • Retention Team (2005) Retaining non-traditional
    students in higher education, Centre for Learning
    and Quality Enhancement University of Teesside
  • Thomas, L. and Hixenbaugh, P. (2006) (eds.)
    Personal Tutoring in Higher Education, Stoke on
    Trent Trentham Books
  • York, M. and Longden, B. (2004) Retention and
    success in higher education, Maidenhead SRHE and
    Open University Press.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com