The Glass Ceiling in Academic Libraries: Myth or Reality PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 9
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Glass Ceiling in Academic Libraries: Myth or Reality


1
The Glass Ceiling in Academic Libraries Myth or
Reality?
  • Applicants
  • Jackie Evans
  • Mary Seeley
  • Karen Butcher
  • Alison Bentley
  • Beatriz Ferrer-Quiles

2
Context
  • Analysis of pay grade structures in academic
    libraries still indicates male / female imbalance
    at top management levels 39 women, 61 men
    (Ritchie, 2000).
  • What constitutes the glass ceiling for todays
    middle managers?
  • Is it cultural, personal or social?

3
Research Objectives
  • To identify if where the glass ceiling exists
    for middle managers.
  • To devise recommendations for good practice in
    relation to gender.
  • To explore mentoring and other workplace
    development strategies as solutions.

4
  • Research
  • Methodology
  • Sample
  • Questionnaire
  • Focus Group
  • Deliverables
  • Profile
  • Guidelines
  • Recommendations

5
  • Dissemination Strategy
  • Focus Group
  • With questionnaire respondents
  • Publication
  • Targeting information community
  • Newsletter
  • Regular communication with stakeholders
  • Mailing Lists
  • Knowledge sharing in the academic community
  • Workshop
  • Half-day interactive training
  • Academic Report
  • Knowledge contribution insight
  • Evaluation
  • Change strategy analysis
  • Validation by the stakeholders
  • Time series analysis
  • Before after data gathering analysis
  • Recommendations
  • Womens Library
  • SOCIG
  • Networking
  • Future of Work Forum

6
Timetable
  • Research Start Date End Date
  • Design send out questionnaires,
  • collate results Start January Mid-March
  • Focus group workshop Mid-May
  • Analysis
  • Analyse questionnaire workshop
    findings Mid-March End June
  • Consolidate/finalise research results End
    June End September
  • Dissemination
  • Prepare submit articles for publication Start
    October Mid-November
  • CPD25 Dissemination workshop End November
  • Review
  • Project review with stakeholders Mid-December

7
BudgetPreparation design,
data gathering from questionnaires, holding
focus group workshop, data analysis
consolidation of results 300 hours _at_
10/hour 3,000 Publication of
findings, holding dissemination workshop60
hours _at_ 10/hour 600Project
review and evaluation15 hours _at_ 10/hour
150Workshop expenses catering,
speakers, room hire - Focus group workshop
650 - Dissemination workshop
450 Sundries stationery, photocopying,
postage 150Total
5,000
8
References
  • Brewerton, A. (2002) Mentoring. SCONUL
    Newsletter, 25, pp. 21-30. Available at
    http//www.sconul.ac.uk/pubs_stats/pubs/newsletter
    /25/21-30_25.pdf. Accessed 25th October 2005.
  • Bunting, M. (2005) Madonnas got it. Have you?
    The Guardian G2 Supplement 25th October 2005,
    pp. 24-25.
  • Equal Opportunities Commission (2005) Policy
    Statement Equal Pay Definitions. Available at
    http//www.eoc.org.uk/Default.aspx?page1492theme
    printlangen. Accessed 24th October 2005.
  • Equal Opportunities Commission (2005) Pregnancy
    Discrimination EOC Investigation. Available at
    http//www.eoc.org.uk/Default.aspx?page149968them
    eprint. Accessed 24th October 2005.
  • Jones, E. and Oppenheim, C. (2002) Glass ceiling
    issues in the UK library profession. Journal of
    librarianship and information science, 34 (1),
    pp. 53-56. Available at http//www.swetswise.com.
    Accessed 24th October 2005.
  • Kerslake, E. (2002) Women and librarianship a
    review article. Journal of librarianship and
    information science, 34 (1), pp. 53-56. Available
    at http//www.swetswise.com. Accessed 24th
    October 2005.
  • Maestrovic Deyrup, M. (2004) Is the revolution
    over? Gender, economic and professional parity in
    academic library leadership positions. College
    and research libraries, 65(3), pp. 242-250.
  • Ritchie, S. (2000) 2000 and beyond is sex in
    Libraries still an issue? Impact Journal of the
    Career Development Group, 3(5), pp. 1-4.
    Available at http//www.careerdevelopmentgroup.org
    .uk/impact/0500/sritchie.htm. Accessed 24th
    October 2005.
  • Smith, A. and Morgan, S. (2001) Informal
    mentoring a perspective from both sides. SCONUL
    Newsletter, 24, pp. 25-28. Available at
    http//www.sconul.ac.uk/pubs_stats/pubs/newsletter
    /24/25-28_24.pdf. Accessed 24th October 2005.
  • Vincent, J. and Linley, R. (2000) Women, social
    exclusion and the public library. Working Paper
    12. The Network Tackling social exclusion in
    libraries, museums, archives and galleries.
    Available at http//www.seapn.org.uk/workingpapers
    /vol3wp12.rtf. Accessed 25th October 2005.
  • Zemon, M. and Harrison Bahr, A. (2005) Career
    and/or children Do female academic librarians
    pay a price for motherhood?. College and
    research libraries, 66(5), pp. 394-495.

9
Research Design References
  • Denscombe, M (2002) Ground rules for good
    research a 10 point guide for social
    researchers. Buckingham, Open University Press.
  • Denscombe, M (2003) The good research guide for
    small-scale social research projects. 2nd
    edition. Maidenhead, Open University Press.
  • O'Leary, Z (2004) The essential guide to doing
    research. London, SAGE.
  • Robson, C (2002) Real world research a resource
    for social scientists and practitioner-researchers
    . 2nd edition. Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Silverman, D (2005) Doing qualitative research a
    practical handbook. 2nd edition. London, Sage.
  • Thomas, R(2003) Blending qualitative
    quantitative research methods in theses and
    dissertations. Thousand Oaks, Ca., Corwin Press.
  • Wisker, G. (2001) The postgraduate research
    handbook succeed with your MA, MPhil, EdD and
    PhD. Basingstoke, Palgrave.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com