Experience Rating Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Experience Rating Review

Description:

Why is the WSIB proposing to enhance NEER starting in 2004 injury year? ... Summary of NEER Enhancements ... What are the NEER enhancements? Claim Cost Limit ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:175
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: pott5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Experience Rating Review


1
Experience Rating Review
  • Proposed NEER Enhancements for 2004 Injury Year
  • Public Consultation
  • September - October 2003

2
Contents
  • Why NEER Enhancements in 2004?
  • Experience Rating Purpose and Objectives
  • NEER Enhancements
  • Next Steps

3
How NEER Works
OrganizationsActual Claim Cost
Components of Gross Premium Rate
Pooling ChargeUnfunded Liability (Retired by
2014)
Pooling Charge NEER Insurance (LLOD / Claim
Limits /Firm Limits / SIEF)
Pooling Charge NEER Insurance (LLOD / Claim
Limits /Firm Limits / SIEF)
NEER Actual Claim Cost
NEER Expected Claim Cost
Compared
Proposed Enhancements - Higher Maximum Claim
Limit- No Project Future Cost On Low LOE
Claims - Higher Rating Factor Calculation -
Higher Minimum Rating Factor - Higher Maximum
Rating Factor
Overhead(WSIB/MOL/SWA/LEG.)
Overhead(WSIB/MOL/SWA/LEG.)
Projected Future Cost (Reserves)
Expected Cost of New Claims
Benefit Payments to Date
Refund or Surcharge
Rating Factor
Surplus (ECgtAC) or Deficit (ECltAC)

X
4
Why is the WSIB proposing to enhance NEER
starting in 2004 injury year?
  • WSIBs plans to introduce a new plan to replace
    NEER and CAD-7(ER plan for Construction Industry
    only).
  • Discussions with some employer associations have
    shown support for changes proposed in the
    development of the new plan.
  • More time is needed to develop a prototype of the
    new plan to demonstrate its value and to ensure
    it works right.
  • Prototype development to be completed in 2004.
  • Consultation on the new experience rating plan is
    scheduled for mid-2004.

5
Why is the WSIB proposing to enhance NEER
starting in 2004 injury year?
  • Other Concerns (Continued)
  • Major reduction in the size of financial
    incentives for employers transitioning from MAP
    (ER plan for small employers with premiums
    between 1,000 25,000) to NEER.
  • Partial compliance in claims reporting that may
    arise from holding reserves on low cost claims.
  • The new plan may impose too much change too
    quickly.
  • Incremental change will improve understanding and
    stage the impacts.

6
Commitment to WSIB Vision
  • We are committed to improving experience rating
    to provide appropriate motivation through
    financial incentives.
  • We believe that experience rating is a strong
    motivator that
  • improves workplace health and safety
  • eliminates workplace injuries, illnesses and
    fatalities
  • improves early and safe return to work

7
Evaluation Criteria for Enhancements
  • Provides value towards achieving the objectives
    of experience rating
  • Aligns with proposed direction of the experience
    rating plan
  • Is administratively easy for employers and the
    WSIB to implement and understand

8
Summary of NEER Enhancements
Two options offers choice of moderate (Option A)
and stronger (Option B) sets of enhancements.
9
What are the NEER enhancements?
  • Higher Minimum Rating Factor
  • Current - 25
  • Option A - 40
  • Option B - 40
  • Why?
  • The size of the incentives (refunds and
    surcharges) for small employers provides
    insufficient financial incentive to improve
    workplace health and safety.
  • An increase in the minimum rating factor will
    restore some of the financial incentive (refunds
    and surcharges) that has eroded over the past
    decade.
  • MAP has maximum refunds and surcharges of 10 and
    50 of gross premium, whereas under NEER maximum
    refunds and surcharges for firms at the MAP
    boundary (25,000 premium) are only 4 and 8 of
    gross premium.

10
What are the NEER enhancements?
  • Higher Maximum Rating Factor
  • Current - 90
  • Option A - 100
  • Option B - 100
  • Why?
  • An increase in the maximum rating factor will
    restore some of the financial incentive (refunds
    and surcharges) that has eroded over the past
    decade.

11
What are the NEER enhancements?
  • Change in Rating Factor Formula
  • Current - Premiums / (Premiums (5 Maximum
    Insurable Earnings))
  • Option A - Premiums / (Premiums (2.5 Maximum
    Insurable Earnings))
  • Option B - 0.20 maximum of
  • Why?
  • Helps restore some of the financial incentive
    (refunds and surcharges) that has eroded over the
    past decade.
  • Option A increases rating factor while retaining
    structure of the current formula
  • Option B increases every firms rating factor and
    allows the factor to reach 100 for very large
    firms.
  • Alternative Insurable Earnings base formula
    recognizes firm size, as well as premium size,
    when setting firms accountability for its own
    experience.
  • The Insurable Earnings alternative impacts
    employers with premium rates below 2.23 i.e.
    just higher than the current average premium rate.

Insurable Earnings
. Insurable
Earnings (225 Maximum Insurable Earnings)
Premiums
. Premiums (5 Maximum
Insurable Earnings)
OR
12
What are the NEER enhancements?
  • No Reserves
  • Current - Health Care Only
  • Option A - Health Care Only less than 500 of
    Non-Health Care
  • Option B - Health Care Only less than 1,000 of
    Non-Health Care
  • Why?
  • Reduce the motivation for partial compliance by
    reducing the cost impact of small cost claims on
    the employers experience rating record.
  • Further increase employer focus on managing more
    serious claims.

13
What are the NEER enhancements?
  • Claim Cost Limit
  • Current - 4 times maximum insurable earnings
    (i.e. 2003 - 262K)
  • Option A - 4 times maximum insurable earnings
    (i.e. 2003 - 262K)
  • Option B - 5 times maximum insurable earnings
    (i.e. 2003 - 328K)
  • Why?
  • Increases the employers accountability for higher
    cost claims.
  • Reduces the amount of insurance primarily for
    large employers and increases the financial
    incentive (refunds and surcharges).

14
What are the NEER enhancements?
  • Expected Cost Factors
  • Current - Injury year specific factors
  • Option A - Injury year specific factors
  • Needs adjustment for removal of low cost claims.
  • Option B - Injury year specific factors
  • Needs adjustment for higher Claim Cost Limit and
    removal of low cost claims.
  • Why?
  • Refining the annual maintenance of expected cost
    factors is necessary in order to better reflect
    each rate groups expected claim costs.

15
Impacts of NEER Enhancements
16
Summary of Impacts ofNEER Enhancements
17
Next Steps
  • Analyse consultation feedback (Due by October 15)
  • Take a recommendation to the WSIBs Board of
    Directors early in December 2003.
  • Communicate approved NEER enhancements to
    employer by mail and through the WSIB web site in
    the last half of December 2003.
  • Approved enhancements in effect for the injury
    year 2004 and forward. First rebates and
    surcharges issued on 2004 injury year in
    September 2005.
  • Consultation on the New Experience Rating Plan is
    planned for mid-2004.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com