District Indicator Report 20042005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

District Indicator Report 20042005

Description:

Excellent Absolute Rating. Good Improvement Rating ... Report card criteria for Improvement Ratings. remain the same. Excellent 0.4 or greater ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: janelle1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: District Indicator Report 20042005


1
District Indicator Report2004-2005
  • Lexington County School District One
  • December 2005

2
Accountability Overview
  • Report Card Results
  • Excellent Absolute Rating
  • Good Improvement Rating
  • Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under federal No
    Child Left Behind legislation
  • District Met AYP

3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Criteria for PACT
Grades were raised in 2004 and in 2005. Adjusted
computations add one SEM.
Attendance 95.3 Percent Tested for all
demographic groups 95 Proficient or better in
ELA 17.6 Proficient or better in Math
15.5
4
Must be met by all subgroups of 40 members for
most categories and of 50 members for students
with limited English proficiency or disabilities
5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Criteria for High
Schools through 2004-2005 AYP allows addition of
one SEM
Graduation Increased or 88.3 Percent
Tested for all demographic groups
95 Proficient or better in ELA 33.3 Proficie
nt or better in Math 30.0
6
(No Transcript)
7
SC Report Card Criteria Raising the bar for all
schools

8
(No Transcript)
9
change district criteria
Phase in Science Social Studies
Add Graduation Rate
HSAP for BSAP
Graduation Rate
10
Excellent
change district criteria
Phase in Science Social Studies
Add Graduation Rate
HSAP for BSAP
Graduation Rate
Good
Average
11
Report card criteria for Improvement Ratings

remain the same.
  • Excellent 0.4 or greater
  • Good 0.3
  • Average 0.1 to 0.2
  • Below Average 0.0
  • Unsatisfactory -0.1 or less

12
Reporting improvement at the top of the range.
Excellent Absolute Rating X 2 years Improvement
Rating of Unsatisfactory is reported as Good.
13
2003-200433 objectivesCompliance Index
10015 schools met AYP5 did not Lowest
school Compliance Index 86
2004-2005 35 objectives Compliance Index
100 11 schools met AYP 9 did not Lowest school
Compliance Index 60
14
Lexington 1 40.3 York 2 (Clover) 40.1
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Comparing years
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
1
4
3
2
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Reversed
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
94.4 highly qualified
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
(No Transcript)
49
In summary
  • Lexington One has challenges
  • Accountability system demands improvement.
  • Population continues to grow.
  • Lexington One has excellent schools
  • that enjoy community support.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com