Title: Affective Predisposition and its Relation to being Comfortable in Uncertainty
1Affective Predisposition and its Relation to
being Comfortable in Uncertainty
- Eser TorunSuraj Basnet
- Leadership Leading on Purpose from Within
- 9/8/2004
2Definition of Affective Predisposition
- Affective predisposition is a component of human
attitude and it mainly covers emotions and
feelings.
3Leadership Under Uncertainty
- A critical element of leadership is the capacity
to tolerate uncertainty. (KhaleeleeWoolf, 1996) - This Capacity...is a function of the
individuals(Jaques, 1956)
-emotional development, -emergent patterns of
defense -Time span discretion
4Determinents of Leadership Capacity under
Uncertainty
-emotional development -emergent patterns of
defense -time-span capacity
- INCREASED TIME SPAN CAPACITY
Time-span Capacity The length of time for
which they are able to tolerate the effects of
exercising the discretion on their own account
in pursuit of living.(Jaques, 1964, p.90)
5Determinents of Leadership Capacity under
Uncertainty
-emotional development -emergent patterns of
defense -time-span capacity
- SENSITIVENESS TO THE EXTERNALITIES
Defense Mechanisms(Freud, 1926) Isolation,
Denial, Repression, Regression, Reaction
Formation, Projection, Introjection, Regression,
Turning against the self.
6Determinents of Leadership Capacity under
Uncertainty
-emotional development -emergent patterns of
defense-time-span capacity
RESILIENCE
Resilience Capacity to tolerate ambiguity and
uncertainty (KhaleeleeWoolf, 1996)
7Emotional Development
- 3 childhood transitions (Emde, Gaensbauer,
Harmon, 1976) - New born to 10 months
- Emotional expressions
- Basic communication learning
- Encounter situations of uncertainty
- 10 months to 36 months
- Emotional refueling
- More autonomy and more connectedness
- Empathy
- 3 to 4 years
- Alternative possibilities for future events
- Emphasis is on vocabulary
- Ability to recognize and deal with different
situations and conflict
8- The capacity to tolerate uncertainty is based
largely on emotional development in
infancy.(Klein, 1946)
9Characteristics of Resilience (Coutu, 2002)
- Facing Down Reality
- Understanding and adapting to reality
- Search for Meaning
- Propensity to make meaning of uncertain times
- Values and purpose of life
- Ability to Improvise
- Do with whatever is at hand
- Creativeness
10Relationship between emotional development and
resilience
- Affective predisposition
- Early stages
- Expressions, communication, learning and
adaptability - Second stages
- Need for motivation, independence and curiosity
and interconnection - Third stages
- Alternative possibilities for future events,
vocabulary, and different siutations
- Resilience
- Facing down reality
- Search for meaning
- Ability to improvise
11Limitations of theory
- Does not consider growth and experiences after
early childhood - Using this theory, many siblings should indicate
the same behavior - Many traits can be changed/improved through
learning processes
12Conclusions
- Do the comments aid others in thinking about
other options - and new directions for thought (open up new
understanding)?.. 4 - Groups insight into leadership concepts
...... 4 - Background research (other than the textbook)
.... 4 - Balance of insight (group was able to present
arguments, as well as counter arguments)
. 5 - Groups handling of questions after the
presentation .3
13Drawbacks of this approach
- As more MBA schools and corporations work with
teams, this personal outlook has limitations - Peoples moods change and so can their PA
- Fairly new and limited research
- Not applied in corporate frameworks
- When risks are high, the results are the same
14References
- Coutu, Diane ( May, 2002). Harvard Business
Review. How Resilience Works. - Williams, Zainuba and Jackson ( May, 2000).
Journal of Managerial Psychology. Affective
influences on risk perceptions and risk
intention. - Khaleelee, Olya and Woolf, Ralph(1996).
Leadership and Organizational Development
Journal. Personality, life experience and
leadership capability. - Simpson, Peter and Burnard (2000). Leadership and
Organizational Development Journal. Leaders
achieving focus in the place of not knowing.
15More than education, more than experience, more
than training, a persons level of resilience
will determine who succeeds and who fails.
Thats true in the cancer ward, its true in the
Olympics, and its also true in the
boardroomDiane Cortu
16Affective Predisposition II
Positive Aspects
More likely to be risk averse
How is your mood?
More likely not to take risks
Negative Aspects
--
- However, when the risks was of decisions was
high, they were risk averse
17Affective Predisposition Theory I
Uncertainty
Gains/Loss
Framing
Personal Involvement
Affective State
Perceptions of Risk
Risky Decision
18Alternative Theories
- Nature
- Genetic
- Personal
- Charisma
- Traits
- Intuition
- Nurture
- Learning
- Critical Events
- Experience
- Richard Ransom
- Guisseppee Garibaldi