Taking Down the Posters - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Taking Down the Posters

Description:

From the experience and a growing array of data that the teacher a student has, ... Teachers, en mass, are therefore not deliberately stifling changes to practice... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: bernie53
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Taking Down the Posters


1
Taking Down the Posters
  • Reflective Windows to Improve Classroom
    Practice

2
Zbar (2008)
  • We know..
  • From the experience and a growing array of data
    that the teacher a student has, and the school he
    or she attends, has a marked impact on the
    outcomes s/he achieves
  • That is why so many parents seek to influence the
    selection of their childrens teachers..and
    express a desire for greater choice in their
    schools.

3
Zbar (in metaphor) says..
  • Oils aint oils (with respect to Castrol)
  • Teachers aint teachers
  • Schools aint schools

4
Elmore (2007) when schools improve..
  • Three processes are happening
  • Knowledge and skills of instructional practice
    increase
  • Teaching is moving from an individual to a
    collective activity
  • The school organises to support instructional
    improvement

5
Elmore (2002) notes
  • One of the strongest social norms among
    (teachers) is that everyone is expected to
    pretend that they are equally effective at what
    they do.however teachers themselves, under the
    right circumstances, will talk candidly about who
    the strong and weak teachers are reputed to be

6
Elmore continues..
  • ..the entire process of school improvement
    depends on schools making public and
    authoritative distinctions among teachers and
    administrators based on quality, competence,
    expertise and performance. If everyone is equally
    good at what they do, then no one has anything to
    teach anyone else how to do it better pretence
    of absolute equality is a major impediment to
    improvement.

7
Hills research (1997)
Percentage variance in value-added measures of
English and Mathematics by class and school
effects in primary schools.
8
Hill notes.
  • that a major improvement in student learning
    would result if all classes were brought up to
    the level of the most effective class.
  • Zbar (2008) comments We should seek to have all
    teachers in the school behaving like the best
    teachers, so a quantum improvement is achieved.

9
Why this variance..?
  • People of all professions want to do a good and
    better job.but dont necessarily know how to..
  • Teachers, en mass, are therefore not deliberately
    stifling changes to practice

10
Practice changes attitudes.
  • Guskeys (1989)..teachers who were able to use
    certain practices successfully expressed more
    positive attitudes towards teaching and (they)
    increased responsibility for their students
    learning.he concludes that changes in attitudes
    and beliefs generally follow, rather than
    precede, changes in behaviour. (cited by Zbar
    2008)
  • Barbers view (2003) is to change behaviours
    through a mix of challenge and support, in the
    knowledge that beliefs will follow.
  • Much teacher learning has a focus on attitudinal
    change, expecting that amended practice will
    follow. In fact, they change in concert(Elmore
    2002)

11
Challenge and support at Mount View Primary
includes.
  • Observational visits to each class followed by
    verbal, individual feedback
  • Instructional coaching (literacy) to embed our
    best practices across year levels
  • What are we looking for?

12
There is guidance from Hattie (2007)
  • Analyses of the effect of different classroom
    interventions (100 available)
  • The typical effect is 0.4, so we should aspire to
    those with higher effects
  • An effect of 1.0 provides a 50 increase in
    achievement or one year of learning.

13
Rank these 10 (from 1 highest effect to 10
lowest effect)
14
The Ranking
  • 1 Feedback .81
  • 2 Classroom behaviour .71
  • 3 Cooperative learning .59
  • 4 Early intervention .49
  • 5 Competitive learning .41
  • 6 Testing .31
  • 7 Questioning .20
  • 8 Diet .12
  • 9 Class size .05
  • 10 Retention (retain a year) -.17

15
The disasters
  • 71 Programmed instruction .14
  • 72 Finances .14
  • 73 Problem based learning .12
  • 74 Diet .12
  • 75 Gender (female-male) .09
  • 76 Inductive teaching .06
  • 77 Team teaching .06
  • 78 Ability grouping - streaming .05
  • 79 Class size .05
  • 80 Open vs. traditional -.01
  • 81 Summer vacation -.06
  • 82 Retention -.17
  • 83 Transfer of school -.26
  • 84 Disruptive students -.78

16
The also rans
  • 56 Metacognitive interventions .29
  • 57 Math programs .27
  • 58 Audio-visual .26
  • 59 Gifted programs .25
  • 60 Coaching .24
  • 61 Behavior objectives .24
  • 62 Calculators .24
  • 63 Mainstreaming .21
  • 64 Questioning .20
  • 65 Learning hierarchies .19
  • 66 Attitude to maths .19
  • 67 Desegregation .18
  • 68 Play .16
  • 69 Television .15

17
Almost there
  • 42 Tutoring .35
  • 43 Activity-based programs .35
  • 44 Remedial programs .35
  • 45 Classroom climate .35
  • 46 Social skills training .35
  • 47 Time .34
  • 48 CAI .32
  • 49 Inquiry based teaching .32
  • 50 Preschool .32
  • 51 Whole language .31
  • 52 Within class grouping .31
  • 53 Testing .31
  • 54 Problem solving .30
  • 55 Background .30

18
In the middle
  • 29 Parent involvement .46
  • 30 Bilingual programs .46
  • 31 Adjunct aids .45
  • 32 Concept mapping .45
  • 33 Advance organizers .44
  • 34 Hypermedia instruction .44
  • 35 Socio economic status .44
  • 36 Perceptual-motor skills .42
  • 37 Individualised instruction .42
  • 38 Homework .41
  • 39 Competitive learning .41
  • 40 Simulations .37
  • 41 Expectations .36

19
Worth having
  • 14 Self-assessment .54
  • 15 Mastery learning .53
  • 16 Creativity programs .52
  • 17 Interactive video .52
  • 18 Psycho-linguistics .51
  • 19 Goals .51
  • 20 Peer influence .50
  • 21 Early intervention .49
  • 22 Outdoor education .49
  • 23 Science .49
  • 24 Professional Development .48
  • 25 Acceleration .47
  • 26 Motivation .47

20
The MAJOR Influences
  • 1 Explicit instruction .93
  • 2 Reciprocal teaching .86
  • 3 Feedback .81
  • 4 Strategy training .80
  • 5 Classroom behaviour .71
  • 6 Prior achievement .71
  • 7 Phonological awareness .70
  • 8 Home environment .69
  • 9 Piagetian programs .63
  • 10 Co-operative learning .59
  • 11 Reading .58
  • 12 Quality of teaching .55
  • 13 Study skills .54

21
Observational visits
  • Informal and formal with a mutually convenient
    time arranged
  • Use examples of observations in general staff
    discussions
  • Culture Im interested. I know whats
    happening. Ive got a contribution to make. I
    learn about learning.
  • Focus of the visit known e.g. differentiation in
    maths lessons
  • Find a few minutes to provide feedback as soon as
    possible

22
Observational feedback.
  • Describe what you saw that you believe to be
    productive teaching behaviour
  • Builds a language
  • Focuses on the teaching
  • Rank the opportunities for improvement in terms
    of instructional effect and limit to 2 or 3

23
Findings from observations
  • Most teachers work with a sense of purpose
  • Efficient and productive use of time an issue for
    many teachers and their students
  • Reflecting on the value of practices is a low
    priority

24
Coaching
  • Identifying our schools best practice through
    class observations
  • Discussion with groups involved (group feedback)
  • General good practice
  • General areas for improvement
  • Identifying individuals with better practices in
    specific areas
  • Individual feedback

25
Coachs support
  • Release teachers to observe in other classes for
    specific purpose
  • Releasing teachers to demonstrate in other
    classes
  • Observe teachers who are working to improve
    practice provide step by step support

26
Setting up the program
  • Developed an Essential Agreement with staff
    involved
  • e. g. We acknowledge that we all have strengths
    to offer but we are open to learning and sharing
    with one another
  • Time-tabled visits from coach and peers

27
Some examples
  • Good practice
  • Differentiation in reading comprehension
    activities
  • Use of IWB as a resource
  • Practices to improve
  • More explicit teaching of dependent students
  • Clarity of teaching focus in writing
  • More consistent assessment processes

28
Some findings from coaching
  • Many staff uncertain about the quality of their
    work - keen to get feedback
  • Keen to observe and learn from peers
  • Keen for further strategies for dependent
    learners
  • Most teachers aware of areas of their teaching
    needing improvement
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com