Title: Iterative Solvers for Coupled FluidSolid Scattering
1Iterative Solvers for Coupled Fluid-Solid
Scattering
- Jan Mandel
- Work presentation
- Center for Aerospace Structures
- University of Colorado at Boulder
- October 10, 2003
2Outline
- The coupled scattering problem
- the PDEs
- the discrete 22 matrix form
- Solving the discrete equations
- Simply proceed as usual on the matrices, or
- Preconditioner to ignore weak coupling between
fluid and the solid blocks, or - Couple existing separate FETI-type methods in the
fluid and in the solid
3Model coupled problem
Radiation b.c.
4Coupled equations
- On the wet interface
- The value of the solid displacement u provides
load for the Helmholtz problem in the fluid - The value of the fluid pressure p provides load
for the elastodynamic problem in the solid - There are no equality constraints on the wet
interface, for this choice of variables
5Existence of solution
- Solution exists
- Solution is unique up to non-radiating modes in
the solid vibrations of the solid that have no
effect on the outside
Only bodies with certain symmetries (such as
sphere) have non-radiating modes almost all
bodies have no non-radiating modes
6Variational formulation
7Discrete problem
- 2x2 block system of equations
- Coupling matrix is like a boundary load
8About the discrete system
- Coupled problem with vastly different scales,
easily by 10 orders of magnitude - scaling is essential
- what is the meaning of the residual?
- Algorithms should be invariant to change of
physical units - assured when physical units match
- Coupling between fluid and solid is weak (details
later)
9Scaling of the discrete problem
- Multiply 2nd equation to make the off-diagonal
blocks same then, - Symmetric diagonal scaling to make both diagonal
blocks of the same magnitude O(1)
10The fluid and the solid are coupled only weakly
- Scaling the fields reveals that the fluid and the
solid are numerically decoupled when - (Mandel 2002)
- Completely decoupled in the limit for a stiff
solid scatterer - Numerically almost decoupled for practically
interesting problems (aluminum, water)
11Solving the discrete equations
- Just go ahead on the matrices with no change in
method, align method interfaces with wet
interface (or not?) - Multigrid (known to work)
- Substructuring (requires apportioning the matrix
T to substructures in some cases not tested
without) - Ignore the weak coupling in a preconditioner
- Block diagonal preconditionining (known to
work) - Needs regularization in solid to avoid resonance
- FETI-type substructuring
- What multipliers on wet interface?
- Couple FETI for fluid FETI for solid
- Known not good enough for unstructured 3D meshes
- Maybe FETI-DP will be better
12Multigrid for the coupled problem
- Coarse nodes on wet interface
- Coarse problem needs to be fine enough to express
waves, albeit crudely - Krylov smoothing (e.g., GMRES) allows
significantly coarser coarse problems (Elman 2001
for Helmholtz Popa 2002 thesis, for coupled)
coarse
fine
fluid
solid
wet interface
13Multigrid performance
Decreasing h, k3h2 const, adding coarse levels,
10 smoothing steps, k10 for h1/32, average
residual reduction smoothing step, domain 1x1
with 0.2x0.2 obstacle in the middle (Popa, 2002)
14Substructuring is based on subassembly of the
block diagonal matrix of Schur complements
- T couples dofs across wet interface
- The extra coupling spoils the subassembly
property decomposition of global matrix into
independent local substructure matrices - The matrix of substructure matrices is no longer
block diagonal, which is needed for parallelism
15Building a substructuring method
- The matrix of substructure Schur complements
needs to be block diagonal to get parallelism.
Some possible approaches - Keep decomposition into substructures, add dofs
of the other kind to substructures adjacent to
the wet interface and apportion the matrix T - Primal only ignore T in the preconditioner, same
as block diagonal preconditioner - Or, duplicate dofs on wet interface, T works
between the duplicates, and enforce equality of
duplicates at converged solution - by Lagrange multipliers
- add new equations to the system
16Substructuring choices
- Respect wet interface as substructure boundary?
If so, - Interiors of substructures get only their
respective fluid or solid dofs - The reduced problem has both fluid and solid dofs
for substructures adjacent to the wet interface - The interface matrix T becomes part of the global
Schur complement - To have global matrix equal to assembly of local
matrices (subassembly property), T needs to be
apportioned to substructures
17Apportioning the interface matrix T
- Fluid substructures get additional solid dofs on
the interface - The local interface matrix is added to the local
matrix of the fluid substructure - Assembled system remains same
Interface matrix
Eliminate interiors
Solid substructures
Fluid substructures
18Apportioning the interface matrix T
- Solid substructures get additional fluid dofs on
the interface - The local interface matrix is added to the local
matrix of the fluid substructure - Assembled system remains same
Interface matrix
Eliminate interiors
Solid substructures
Fluid substructures
19Apportioning the interface matrix T
- Fluid substructures get additional solid dofs,
AND solid substructures get fluid dofs both
shared by substructures adjacent across the wet
interface - Part of the local interface matrix is added to
the local matrix of the fluid substructure, part
to the solid substructure - The assembled system remains same
Interface matrix
Eliminate interiors
Solid substructures
Fluid substructures
20Substructuring that ignores the wet interface
- Respect wet interface as substructure boundary?
If not - Substructures can have both fluid or solid dofs
- The interface matrix T becomes part of the global
Schur complement - But T still needs to be apportioned every time
more than one substructure have a common segment
of the wet interface - Efficient iterative substructuring when the
substructures may have both types of dofs?
Eliminate interiors
Apportioning needed
Solid substructures
Fluid substructures
Interface matrix
21Substructuring with apportioned T
- Once the problem is written as subassembly of
local substructure matrices, all existing
substructuring methods can proceed (primal BDD,
or dual, Lagrange multipliers FETI) - Basis for futher developments
- But specific methods not tested
22Block diagonal preconditioning
Precond. Scaling
Scaling
- Preconditioner can use existing solvers for fluid
and solid separately - The 2nd diagonal block (solid) will be singular
at resonance frequences - Damping for solid provided via only
- Need to provide artificial damping without
changing the solution
23Avoiding resonance for block diagonal
preconditioning
- Regularization Add to the equations in solid a
complex linear combination of equations in fluid,
coefficients determined by analogy with
radiation boundary conditions in solid (Mandel,
Popa 2003) - Needed also for FETI-type methods when there is
only one substructure for solid (Mandel 2002)
24Regularization of the matrix of the solid for
block diagonal preconditioning
The form of the coefficient follows from analogy
with a radiation condition that does not reflect
normal shear waves and from the requirement of
correct physical units (Mandel 2002).
25The effect of the regularization of the solid in
block diagonal preconditioning
- Residual reduction by 3 GMRES iterations with
block diagonal preconditioning by independent
solvers in the fluid and in the solid, mesh
200x200
26Dual approachesFETI
- Apportion T and Tt to local matrices and simply
use FETI on the subassembled system - Not tested
- Note cannot have multipliers to enforce equality
of fluid pressure and solid displacement at wet
interface nothing needs to equal there - Substructure adjacent to wet interface will have
both fluid and solid dofs - Goal To use methods known to work for solid and
fluid separately - duplicate dofs on wet interface to have only
substructures that have only fluid or only solid
dofs - Enforce equality of the duplicates by Lagrange
multipliers or additional equations - The matrix T forms other blocks in the system
27Variant 1 FETI with interface segments as new
substructures
- Duplicate dofs on wet interface just like dofs
are duplicated on substructure interfaces in
standard subassembly create new substructures
with the duplicate dofs on the wet interface - Have 3 types of substructures solid, fluid, wet
interface - Enforce equality of duplicated dofs by Lagrange
multipliers - Eliminate dofs, keep Lagrange multipliers.get
FETI
Lagrange multipliers
But this did not work very well maybe missing
coarse for interface?
28Variant 2 FETI with system augmentation
- Goal exploit the numerically weak coupling
between the fluid and the solid a method that
converges like fluid and solid separately - Inspired by FETI-DP, leave something primal
around - Duplicate dofs on wet interface
- Keep duplicates in the system
- Keep equations enforcing equality of duplicated
dofs in the system - Eliminate substructure dofs, keep Lagrange
multipliers and the duplicated primal dofs on the
wet interface
Interface matrix
Eliminate interiors
Lagrange multipliers
Fluid substructures
Wet interface substructures
Solid substructures
29Augmented system
Original equations
Duplicate dofs on wet interfaces equal
select wet interface dofs
Now eliminate the original variables
.
30Reduced system after eliminating original primary
variables
0
Feti operators for fluid and solid
0
0
In the limit for stiff obstacle, the reduced
system becomes triangular. The diagonal blocks
are FETI operators for fluid and solid, and
identity. The spectrum of the reduced operator
becomes union of the spectra of the two FETI
operators, and the number one.
31Coarse problem
- Variational coarse correction in the usual way,
using plane waves or eigenfunctions - For better convergence the wet interface
components also need have coarse space functions - Setup and solution of the coarse problem is a
dominant cost - Coarse space needs to be large enough for
convergence
32Convergence
- OK in 2D, structured meshes
- About same as max of iterations for solid or
fluid separately - Not so good in 3D unstructured meshes
- About as sum of the iterations for fluid and
solid separately
Why?
33Convergence of GMRES
- GMRES convergence depends on
- clustering of the spectrum
- Estimates exist for spectrum on one side of
origin - Convergence better when eigenvalues are clustered
away from origin bad when eigenvalues scattered
around - condition of the matrix of eigenvectors
- But there is no reason why the convergence of
GMRES for a block diagonal matrix should be
rigorously bounded by a formula involving
iteration counts when GMRES is applied to the
blocks separately - Even if the spectrum of the matrix is the union
of the spectra of the blocks
34Preconditioning by coarse problem with waves
focuses the spectrum
2d reduced operator, fluid only
Same, preconditioned by coarse problem from plane
waves
35Preconditioning by coarse problem with waves
focuses the spectrum
2d reduced operator, elastic only
Same, preconditioned by coarse problem from plane
waves
36Spectrum of preconditioned reduced augmented
system, 2d structured mesh
Coupled only
Coupled overlaid by fluid and solid
Bluefluid, greensolid, redcoupled
37Spectrum of preconditioned reduced augmented
system, 3d unstructured mesh
Coupled only
Coupled overlaid by fluid and solid
Bluefluid, greensolid, redcoupled
38Conclusions for coupled FETI
- Spectrum of the coupled problem is almost exactly
the union of the spectrum of the fluid and the
solid, because the coupling is weak - For the 3d unstructured problem, the union is not
well clustered away from origin - While for 2d structured the spectra fit well
together - Unknown if the culprit is 3d or unstructured
- This problem will be shared by every method that
runs FETI-H for fluid and for solid together - For FETI-DP the situation may be different